Torbay Local SEND Reform Plan 2026
Torbay SEND Reform Plan
Final Version for DfE Submission
June 2026
1 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
Name of Local Authority: Torbay Council Name of Integrated Care Board: Devon and Cornwall ICB Local SEND Reform Plan SRO: Hannah Baker, Divisional Director for Education and SEND Signatories
| Role | Name | Signature | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chief Executive, Torbay Council | Anne-Marie Bond | 16 June 2026 | |
| Director Children’s Services, Torbay Council | Nancy Meehan | 16 June 2026 | |
| Director of Finance, Torbay Council | Malcolm Coe | 16 June 2026 | |
| Local SEND Reform Plan SRO | Hannah Baker | 18 June 2026 | |
| Independent Chair | Alison Hurley | 18 June 2026 | |
| Chief Executive, NHS Devon Integrated Care Board (ICB) | Mark Hackett | 18 June 2026 | |
| Place Director, NHS Devon Integrated Care Board (ICB) | Susan Bracefield | 18 June 2026 |
2 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
Executive Summary
1. Build a 0–25 system where children and young people achieve and thrive Torbay is moving towards a fully integrated 0–25 SEND system, shifting from a reactive and fragmented model to one that is inclusive, preventative and coordinated. This reflects high levels of need linked to deprivation, health inequalities and complex family circumstances, alongside rising demand, delays in support and inconsistent family experiences. a) More inclusive settings: Currently, only 35.8% of pupils with EHCPs attend mainstream settings, alongside high levels of absence and exclusions. Inconsistent delivery of the universal offer and graduated response continues to drive uneven inclusion and escalating need. Over the next three years, Torbay will strengthen Ordinarily Available Inclusive Provision (OAIP) and an effective graduated response, embed locality-based delivery and expand early intervention through the Experts at Hand offer (EaHO). These actions aim to increase mainstream inclusion, reduce reliance on out-of-area placements and ensure needs are met earlier and more effectively.
b) Stronger local partnerships: Partnership working has significantly improved following inspection and implementation of the Priority Impact Plan, with clearer governance and more aligned leadership through the SEND Board. However, historical challenges in joint working, commissioning and communication have contributed to fragmentation and delays. The ambition is a fully integrated system where parent carers, education, health and care partners operate through shared pathways, joint commissioning and locality-based delivery. This will be supported by Family Hubs, Families First and sub-regional collaboration to improve consistency and efficiency.
2. Improve workforce capacity and capability Workforce capacity remains a significant challenge, particularly in Educational Psychology, Speech and language therapy and wider health services. Recruitment and retention difficulties impact timeliness, quality and system resilience, while variability in practitioner confidence contributes to inconsistent early identification and reliance on referrals. Over the next three years, Torbay will build a more confident and skilled workforce across all sectors. Priorities include strengthening SEN Co- ordinator (SENDCo)capacity, expanding multi-agency training and embedding specialist outreach through the Experts at Hand offer. This will support earlier intervention, reduce dependency on Education, Health and Care Plans (EHCPs) and enable more needs to be met within mainstream provision.
3 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
3. Improve confidence and experience of children, families and stakeholders Inspection findings highlighted delays, inconsistent experiences and weak communication, contributing to low parental confidence. Although governance, data use and engagement are improving, these changes are not yet consistently experienced by families. The next phase will focus on delivering visible improvements in key pressure areas, including EHCP timeliness, health waiting times and exclusions, alongside strengthening communication and co-production. The aim is to create a more responsive and transparent system, with clear pathways, timely support and meaningful family involvement in decision-making.
4. Stabilise finances and improve value for money Since joining the Safety Valve Programme in 2023, Torbay has strengthened oversight of the SEND budget, placing it in a strong position for SEND reform. It has been successful in containing placements at Independent and Non-Maintained Special Schools through a targeted programme of enhancing special school enhanced provision, now the focus will be turned to strengthening mainstream provision. Financial pressures do still remain due to historically high EHCP demand and reliance on specialist provision, particularly in ASC (Autistic Spectrum Condition), SEMH (Social, Emotional, and Mental Health) and alternative provision.
Over the next three years, resources will be aligned more effectively through strategic commissioning, data-led planning and a co-produced sufficiency strategy. Investment in early intervention, inclusive mainstream practice and integrated delivery will reduce reliance on high-cost provision while improving outcomes.
Overall, financial sustainability is closely linked to system reform: a more inclusive, preventative and coordinated approach will deliver better outcomes, improved experiences and long-term value for money.
Section 1 – Vision and Goals
1. What the local area partnership is trying to achieve? Our Vision A SEND system in Torbay that is inclusive and ambitious, where children and young people with SEND:
- are valued, supported early, and able to do well in their local communities while growing in confidence for adult life.
- receive the right support at the right time, in the right place.
- feel they belong and be ready for independent and fulfilling lives.
4 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
To achieve this, 5 overarching goals will guide delivery to 2029.
Goal 1: Improved educational outcomes for children and young people with SEND through earlier identification and effective intervention in inclusive provision • Increase the proportion of children and young people with SEND making meaningful individual progress, recognising personalised measures of development alongside academic attainment in line with age related expectations, within inclusive early years, schools and colleges which embed early and timely support following the identification of need.
Goal 2: Increased confidence in local SEND arrangements
- Implement clear, widely understood and trusted SEND pathways which in turn increase confidence by ensuring clear accountability, transparency in decision making and consistent communication, so families understand who is responsible, what will happen next, and why.
Goal 3: Meaningful co-production with families and young people is embedded across the system
- Ensure co-production influences decisions, priorities and outcomes, not just process, with evidence of how feedback from children, young people and families shape change.
Goal 4: Improved experience of assessment and planning
- Improve experience of all assessment and planning by focusing on quality, clarity and confidence, including better communication, fewer disputes, and a reduced need for families to escalate concerns.
Goal 5: Strong financial governance and accountability
- Have strong oversight and act to use resources more efficiently. Reduce reliance on independent specialist placements by investing earlier in workforce capacity, alternative provision and preventative support, enabling needs to be met locally sooner.
Appendix 9: supports questions 1 and 9, it includes a table that shows how these goals have been informed by Parent/carer and young person’s feedback
5 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
Section 2 – Strategy
2. Where the local area partnership expects to be in the next 3 years Local blueprint for the next 3 years
Note: Our 5 success measures and target metrics are also listed within the summary 3-year roadmap see response to question 5. There are 5 success Measures in our plan, this table shows how they align across all building blocks.
- Equitable inclusion, adequate provision, sustained attendance, and measurable outcomes
- Workforce capability and confidence
- Effective demand management through early intervention and timely support
- Improved experiences, strengthened co-production, and greater confidence in services
- Data, Insight and Quality
Summary Table
Appendix 1 sets out in detail how Torbay has addressed the 43 minimum requirements on the DfE’s reform plan guidance Building Block 1: Strengthening Inclusion Across Education Settings
Pillars 2, 3, 4 and 7
Summary of enablers and success measures
Where we are
Where we will be in the next 3 years Torbay SEND Local Area Partnership is in a strong position to make rapid improvements over the next three years.
In three years, Torbay will have a confident, integrated SEND system underpinned by a strong universal offer that enables early identification and support within mainstream
The successful delivery of these SEND improvements is underpinned
6 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
by a set of core enablers that collectively drive better outcomes, efficiency, and confidence across the system:
Our recent Priority impact Plan, which has focused on many of the key building blocks, mean our infrastructure for change is already progressing.
settings. Staff will be equipped to meet needs effectively, with clear and rapid pathways to specialist support where required. Inclusion will be strengthened through expanded mainstream provision, specialist outreach, and locality- based collaboration, reducing reliance on high-cost placements and exclusions while improving parental confidence.
Changes already made to our governance mean we are starting from a strong and robust position, our priorities in universal support, commissioning and support whilst waiting mean we can enhance what has already been started.
Strong leadership & governance – clear strategy, accountability, and decision- making
Skilled and sufficient workforce – capacity across education, health, and SEND services with strong training.
Inclusive practice in mainstream settings – consistent graduated response and early intervention
Local provision & commissioning – sufficient, high-quality local placements to reduce reliance on independents.
Effective processes & data – streamlined systems, strong performance tracking, and timely delivery
Partnership working – integrated multi-agency collaboration across education, health, and care.
Early help & demand management – accessible
Planning will be fully evidence-led, using JSNA intelligence to shape a coherent, high-quality network of provision across all areas, ensuring equitable access and reduced variability. Surplus capacity will be repurposed to meet demand, and transport considerations will be embedded in decision-making.
Recent work on our sufficiency has already made key changes to place numbers and types of need. Our improvement grants and pilot work have already trailed many ‘Expert at Hand’ services.
Our Locality Pilots have given us a valuable ‘test and learn’ opportunity to now springboard and expand this style of collaboration. Support from the DfE RISE universal programme is drawing all school settings together to support the wider inclusion work.
Overall, the system will deliver consistent, place-based support, improved outcomes, and a more sustainable, inclusive SEND offer.
7 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
support pathways to reduce escalation to EHCPs.
Stakeholder confidence – strong engagement with parents, carers, and schools
Success Measures
Baseline
Target Metrics
Inclusion and Sufficiency Inclusion and Sufficiency By 2029 children and young people with SEND in Torbay will experience greater belonging, earlier support and improved outcomes. We expect to see change in the following key indicators that evidence change within our system: % of EHCP pupils educated in mainstream settings in Jan 2026 35.80% % of EHCP pupils educated in mainstream settings in Jan 2029 40.72% In Area Independent Placements 42 % of children who are identified as SEN K 13.10% In Area Independent Placements 31 (25% reduction) % of children who are identified as SEN K 14.2% (national) Target number of inclusion bases Specialist Bases – 7 primary, Secondary - 3 Inclusion Bases- 10 primary, 5 secondary (mandatory) Number of children who are EHE due to unmet need 500 NMSS or Independent Schools - LA Funded Target number of inclusion bases Current ERPs- 4 Number of children who are EHE due to unmet need 608 (June 2026) NMSS or Independent Schools - LA Funded 2.30%
- Equitable inclusion, adequate
provision, sustained attendance, and measurable outcomes
Increase % of EHCP pupils educated in mainstream settings year-on-year
Reduce number and rate of in-area independent placements
Improve availability and balanced occupancy of local specialist provision
Increase proportion of pupils supported at SEN Support level (prevent escalation)
Reduce reliance on independent special school places
Attendance and Outcomes 2.00% Attendance and Outcomes Absence rates for pupils who are SEN K 13.20% Absence rates for pupils who have an EHCP 14.10% Persistent Absence for pupils who are SEN K 817 pupils Absence rates for pupils who are SEN K 11.20% Absence rates for pupils who have an EHCP 12.10% Persistent Absence for pupils who are SEN K 500 Pupils Persistent Absence for pupils who have an EHCP 510 pupils Suspension rates for pupils who are SEN K 52.12 Suspension rates for pupils who have an EHCP 67.11
8 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
| • Improve attendance rates for | EYFS GLD for all children 68.5% (749) EYFS GLD for children who have 50.7% (109) free school meals Young people who are SEN and 125 NEET (March NEET (16-18) 2026) % of children achieving Eng & above national Maths (L5) for children at SEN (23.7%: 22.4%) support (by age 16) | Persistent Absence for pupils who | 300 pupils | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pupils with SEND | have an EHCP | 300 pupils | ||||
| • Reduce persistent absence | Suspension rates for pupils who are | In line with national | ||||
| within the SEND cohort | SEN K | figures | ||||
| • Reduce fixed-term and | Suspension rates for pupils who | In line with national | ||||
| have an EHCP | figures | |||||
| permanent exclusions for | ||||||
| EYFS GLD for all children | 77.8% (850) | |||||
| pupils with SEND | ||||||
| • Improved Early Years | ||||||
| EYFS GLD for children who have | 61.6% (132) | |||||
| Foundation Stage (EYFS) | ||||||
| free school meals | ||||||
| Good Level of Development | ||||||
| (GLD) | Young people who are SEN and | In line with statistical neighbours | ||||
| • Reduce number of young | NEET (16-18) | |||||
| people with SEND who | ||||||
| become Not in Education, | % of children achieving Eng & Maths | In line with national | ||||
| Employment, or Training | (L5) for children at SEN support (by | |||||
| (NEET) | age 16) | |||||
| Building Block 2: Access to specialist support and local placements | ||||||
| Pillars 4, 5 and 6 | ||||||
| Summary of enablers and success | Where we are | Where we will be in the next 3 years | ||||
| measures | ||||||
| Torbay is well placed to deliver the Experts at Hand | By year three, Torbay will have a fully embedded and | |||||
| The successful delivery of these | model, having already introduced many of its core | mature Experts at Hand (EAH) model, delivered through a | ||||
| SEND improvements for Building | components through strong partnership working over | jointly owned partnership approach with clear governance, | ||||
| Block 2 is supported by a set of core | the past 18 months. A robust evidence base, | shared accountability and formalised delivery arrangements. | ||||
| enablers that strengthen capacity, | combining JSNA intelligence and co-production with | The offer will be cohesive, consistent and shaped by robust | ||||
| consistency, and confidence across | families, provides a clear understanding of local needs | data, ongoing co-production and a continuously evolving | ||||
| the system: | and priorities. Existing provision, such as specialist | partnership pathway map. | ||||
| outreach, neurodiversity programmes and SEMH | ||||||
| • Capacity and workforce – | Alternative Provision will operate as part of a flexible, tiered | |||||
| locality pilots, offers a solid foundation for integrated, | ||||||
| sufficient specialist services | system, with sufficient capacity and a stronger focus on | |||||
| multiagency support, alongside early improvements in | ||||||
| and skilled practitioners | early, needs led intervention rather than exclusion. | |||||
| access to key therapies. | ||||||
| across the system | Mainstream settings will have consistent, timely access to |
9 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
Clear pathways and processes – consistent multi- agency pathways and efficient referral systems
Inclusive and early intervention practice – strong mainstream support and focus on prevention and reintegration.
Equitable provision – consistent service offers across all settings with targeted support for vulnerable groups.
Data and performance focus – tracking outcomes, timeliness, and impact to drive improvement.
Engagement and confidence – clear communication, co- production, and support to build trust among families, schools, and practitioners.
The next phase will focus on scaling and aligning this work into a more coherent and consistent system, addressing gaps in alternative provision and workforce capacity. Strong governance through the SLAIP Board and Priority Impact Plan provides clear accountability. Over the next three years, Torbay will expand and embed the model, improving timeliness, consistency and access to specialist expertise across the system.
specialist support, underpinned by a resilient, jointly commissioned workforce and strengthened regional collaboration.
This will be supported by stable implementation frameworks, clear performance oversight, and locality-based working that brings partners together around shared priorities. The result will be a more integrated, preventative and responsive system, delivering more consistent experiences and improved outcomes for children, young people and families
Success Measures
Baseline
Target Metrics
Improving Workforce Capability and Confidence
- Workforce capability and
confidence
Recruit and retain specialist staff for EAH model
Positive feedback from settings and families on EAH
Increasing proportion of EAH time on whole school delivery
Improving Workforce Capability and Confidence Recruit and retain specialist staff for Experts at Hand Model (EP, SaLT and OT and their support workers) 100% appointed- subject to recruitment (see appendix 6 EAH plan) Recruit and retain specialist staff for Experts at Hand Model (Educational Psychologists, Speech and Language Therapists and Occupational Therapy and their support workers) 2025/2026 FTE: SaLT =11.9 Ot = 5.97 Ep = 9.81 Positive feedback from settings and families on Experts at Hand which Target to be calculated after establishing baseline
10 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
| • Reducing repeat referrals for the same issues 3. Effective demand management through early intervention and timely support • Reduce waiting lists for specialist support • Reduce waiting times for specialist input • Increase % of EHCPs completed within 20-week statutory timescales • Shorten wait times for therapies (e.g. SALT, EP, CAMHS) • Reduced waiting times for specialist services (e.g. EP, SALT, OT) • Mainstream settings with increased access to Education Psychologists/SaLT/OT Other Effective demand management through early intervention and timely support are listed under Building Block three. 4. Improved experiences, strengthened co-production, and greater confidence in services • Improved ability for users to understand and navigate the system | Positive feedback from | Baseline to be established in year 1 | shows that the model is | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| settings and families on | embedding including access | |||||||
| Experts at Hand which shows | to support, timeliness of | |||||||
| that the model is embedding | support, staff confidence in | |||||||
| including access to support, | meeting need and monitoring | |||||||
| timeliness of support, staff | workload burden and | |||||||
| confidence in meeting need | wellbeing | |||||||
| and monitoring workload | Increasing proportion of | Target to be calculated after establishing baseline | ||||||
| burden and wellbeing | Experts at Hand time spent | |||||||
| Increasing proportion of | Baseline to be established in year 1 | on whole setting delivery | ||||||
| Experts at Hand time spent on | Decreasing repeat requests | Target to be calculated after establishing baseline | ||||||
| whole setting delivery | for the same challenges from | |||||||
| Decreasing repeat requests | Baseline to be established in year 1 | the same settings, showing | ||||||
| for the same challenges from | learning is embedding and | |||||||
| the same settings, showing | confidence increasing | |||||||
| learning is embedding and | Equitable distribution of | Target to be calculated after establishing baseline | ||||||
| confidence increasing | support delivered across | |||||||
| Equitable distribution of | Baseline to be established in year 1 | Early Years, schools and | ||||||
| support delivered across Early | post-16 | |||||||
| Years, schools and post-16 | Earlier Intervention and Timeliness | Earlier Intervention and Timeliness | ||||||
| Earlier Intervention and Timeliness | Earlier Intervention and Timeliness | |||||||
| Number of available | 120 | |||||||
| Number of available specialist | Current ERP placements 96 | specialist places in | ||||||
| places in mainstream settings | mainstream settings in | |||||||
| in specialist bases | specialist bases | |||||||
| Number and proportion of | EOTAS 51 (2.7%) % of EHCPs Jan 2026 | Number and proportion of | >40 or 1.5% of EHCPs | |||||
| children and young people | children and young people | |||||||
| with SEND who are EOTAS | with SEND who are EOTAS | |||||||
| Waiting times for community | Average 40% waiting less than 18 weeks | Waiting times for community | 95% waiting less than 18 | |||||
| therapies (not including ND): | therapies (not including ND): | weeks | ||||||
| ND waiting times - over 18 weeks | ND waiting times - over 18 | Reduction in number waiting over 18 weeks | Reduction in number waiting | |||||
| ND Waiting times - over 18 weeks | ND Waiting times - over 18 | 1,096 waiting | weeks | over 18 weeks | ||||
| weeks | Over 18 weeks | |||||||
| 20-week timeliness for | In line or above national | |||||||
| 20-week timeliness for EHCPs (Published 2024) | 29% | 29% | EHCPs | average | ||||
| Experience and Confidence |
11 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
- Reduced complaints, disputes, and tribunal cases
- Increased practitioner confidence in inclusive practice
- Improved satisfaction among families, schools, and practitioners
Other Improved experiences, strengthened co-production, and greater confidence in services are listed under Building Block three.
Experience and Confidence Feedback from Parent/carers By 2029 a 30% confidence rating - as measured in the Annual participation survey - will be shown. Rate of complaints Number of appeals Feedback from Parent/carers Baseline to be established following June 2026 parent/carer survey Rate of complaints Number of appeals 50% reduction 80 appeals in 2029 Average 12 per month (6MP enquiries and 6 complaints) – May2026 Estimated 160 appeals in 2026 Teacher confidence in meeting SEND needs Teacher confidence in meeting SEND needs Show a 30% increase in confidence rating Recent Locality Pilot survey indicated the pilot had improved teacher confidence in meeting SEND needs. Create a wider baseline to measure confidence levels across all needs and school settings Building Block 3: System Leadership, Local Partnership Collaboration and Co-production
Pillars 1, 3 and 5
Summary of Enablers and Success Measures
Where we are
Where we will be in the next 3 years Torbay has strong commitment and emerging foundations for an inclusive SEND system, but delivery remains inconsistent and not yet fully embedded. The universal offer and graduated response vary across settings, with unclear expectations, limited shared frameworks and inconsistent early intervention, meaning support is still often reactive and referral-led. While there are positive developments, such as early years pathways, post-16 expansion, locality pilots, and growing co-production, In three years, Torbay will have a fully embedded, co-produced OAIP/Universal Offer that is consistently understood and applied across all settings, supported by strong partnership working with schools, MATs, health and families.
Building Block 3 focuses on strengthening early intervention, consistency, and user experience across the SEND system. Success is demonstrated through earlier identification of need, reduced time from identification to intervention, and consistent access to Early Advice and Help across all phases. A more
A locality based early intervention model and fully operational Experts at Hand approach will ensure timely, predictable access to specialist support, strengthening
12 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
equitable system is achieved through a universal offer that is consistently delivered across early years, schools, and post-16 settings, supporting improved outcomes in attendance, behaviour, and attainment. Alongside this, a stronger focus on experience and confidence ensures that families, young people, and practitioners can more easily understand, access, and navigate support, with increased satisfaction and trust in the system. Embedded co-production and meaningful participation further enhance responsiveness and transparency.
these are not yet consistently applied or aligned into a coherent system-wide approach.
mainstream inclusion and reducing escalation to statutory processes, specialist placements and exclusions.
Variability in mainstream provision and access to specialist advice contributes to escalation of need and continued reliance on specialist placements. Workforce capacity and sufficiency challenges, particularly in alternative provision, further impact early support. Although data, participation and partnership working are improving, they are not yet fully integrated into decision-making or commissioning, which remains influenced by short-term pressures rather than prevention.
Provision will be shaped by shared data, locality profiles and evidence-based practice, with schools working collectively to meet need through agreed interventions and consistent high-quality teaching. Pathways from early years through to post-16 will be clear, coordinated and inclusive, supporting smoother transitions and stronger outcomes into adulthood, including reduced NEET rates.
Co-production will be embedded as standard practice, with the voices of children, young people and families visibly influencing decisions at all levels. A stronger SENDIASS offer and improved early resolution processes will increase parental confidence and reduce conflict.
Overall, Torbay is a system in transition, with strong building blocks but a need to embed consistency, strengthen early intervention and universal practice, and align partnership efforts into a single, coherent framework that improves inclusion and outcomes.
The system will be underpinned by integrated, partnership led commissioning, with shared accountability, real time intelligence and a focus on early intervention and prevention. Overall, Torbay will deliver a coherent, inclusive and sustainable SEND system, with improved outcomes, greater placement stability and more equitable experiences for children, young people and families.
These outcomes are enabled by a set of core system enablers:
Early identification and intervention systems – strong processes to identify needs early and reduce time from identification to support
Accessible Early Advice & Help (EAH) – consistent availability of early support across all education phases and settings
Clear, consistent pathways – well-defined multi-agency processes that are understood and applied consistently
Equitable universal offer/ Ordinarily Available Inclusive
13 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
Provision – a standardised level of early intervention and support across Early Years, schools, and post-16
Workforce capacity and capability – sufficient, skilled, and confident practitioners delivering inclusive practice
Data and performance oversight – tracking timeliness, access, and outcomes to drive continuous improvement
Inclusive practice and provision – strong mainstream support and focus on improving attendance, behaviour, and attainment
Co-production and participation – embedded partnership working with families and young people, including ‘Your Voice in Action”
Communication and navigation support – clear, accessible information to improve user experience and confidence
System-wide collaboration – effective joint working across education, health, and care services
Baseline
Target Metrics
Success Measures
Demand and Escalation Demand and Escalation (3) Effective demand management through early intervention and timely support Number of EHCNAs EHCNAs for full year 2025 = 399
14 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
Stabilise or reduce EHCP requests
Lower proportion of requests progressing to statutory EHCPs
Increase early support at SEN Support level without escalation
Strengthen use of the graduated response, including OAP
| Number of | 2025: 251/399 (63%) EHCNAs | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| EHCNAs resulting | resulted in a plan | ||
| in plan | |||
| Number of pupils | 2024/25 SEN K = 13.1% (update | ||
| identified as SEN K | is June – annual data) | ||
| Number of | New measure – OAP being introduced by Sep 26 – no baseline | New measure – OAP being | |
| mainstream | introduced by Sep 26 – no | ||
| schools using the | baseline | ||
| Torbay OAP tools | |||
| Co-production and Participation | Co-production and Participation | ||
| Co-production Activities | 2026 baseline to be established | ||
| following focus in Priority Impact | |||
| Plan | |||
| Attendance at co- | 2026 baseline to be established following focus in Priority Impact Plan | 2026 baseline to be established | |
| production and | following focus in Priority Impact | ||
| engagement | Plan | ||
| events and family | |||
| Acting on the voice of families | Acting on the voice | Number of ‘Your Voice in Action’ | |
| of families | reports published in 2026 & | ||
| feedback from parent carers |
| Number of EHCNAs | Forecast an initial increase up to | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2027, with the numbers stabilising at | |||
| 495 from 2028 to 2029. | |||
| Number of EHCNAs resulting in plan | Reduce the proportion of requests | ||
| progressing to EHCP Issues to 60% | |||
| Number of pupils | Increase in the percentage of SEN K to national norms | Increase in the percentage of SEN K | |
| identified as SEN K | to national norms | ||
| Number of | Target is for 85% of mainstream | ||
| mainstream schools | schools to be using the Torbay OAP | ||
| using the Torbay | by Sep 27 evidenced by audit – | ||
| OAP tools | increasing to 100% by 2029 | ||
| Co-production and Participation | |||
| Co-production Activities | Increased Number of Co-production | ||
| activities by stakeholder type | |||
| Attendance at co- | Increase attendance at events and parent /carer and YP surveys | Increase attendance at events and | |
| production and | parent /carer and YP surveys | ||
| engagement events | |||
| and family surveys | |||
| Acting on the voice of families | Acting on the voice | Maintained number of ‘Your Voice in | |
| of families | Action’ reports published annually & | ||
| feedback from parent carers |
Other Effective demand management through early intervention and timely support are listed under Building Block two above (4) Improved experiences,
strengthened co-production, and greater confidence in services
Co-production embedded as standard practice across all partners
Increased and more diverse participation from families and young people
Regular and meaningful use of “Your voice in Action” to demonstrate impact and responsiveness
Other Improved experiences, strengthened co-production, and greater confidence in services are listed under Building Block 2.
15 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
| Building Block 4: Encouraging Inclusive Culture and Behaviours | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Pillars 2, 6 and 7 | |||
| Enablers and Success measures | Where we are | Where we will be in the next 3 years In three years, Torbay aims to have a confident, fully aligned SEND system where education, health and care work seamlessly together with shared leadership, governance and accountability. Education providers, from early years to further education, SEND Family Voice Torbay and the SEND Youth Forum will be embedded as equal, influential partners in decision-making, helping to shape strategy and delivery. The system will be inclusive, consistent and responsive, supported by strong collaboration and a shared responsibility for outcomes. A fully data-driven approach, with unified dashboards and shared intelligence, will enable informed decisions, strengthen accountability and improve outcomes for children and young people with SEND. A fully embedded a culture of rigorous financial stewardship, where every element of SEND expenditure is systematically planned, scrutinised, and aligned to demonstrable outcomes. The robust governance arrangements introduced since 2023 will have matured into a highly efficient, intelligenceled system. This will enable proactive rather than reactive management of resources, ensuring that investment is targeted early, effectively, and sustainably | Where we will be in the next 3 years |
| summary | |||
| Torbay has a well-established SEND partnership | In three years, Torbay aims to have a confident, fully aligned | ||
| Building Block 4 is focused on | governance structure, with the SEND Local Area | SEND system where education, health and care work | |
| strengthening system leadership, | Improvement Partnership (SLAIP) Board providing a | seamlessly together with shared leadership, governance | |
| accountability, and intelligence to | central forum for strategic decision-making and cross- | and accountability. Education providers, from early years to | |
| ensure effective partnership working, | agency accountability, supported by strong | further education, SEND Family Voice Torbay and the | |
| high expectations related to inclusive | representation from all education phases and | SEND Youth Forum will be embedded as equal, influential | |
| culture and behaviours and delivering | alignment with wider improvement priorities. Oversight | partners in decision-making, helping to shape strategy and | |
| good value for money. | is strengthened through links to the Children’s | delivery. | |
| Continuous Improvement Board and system | |||
| • Strong, shared leadership - | The system will be inclusive, consistent and responsive, | ||
| leadership, while increasingly robust data dashboards, | |||
| clearly aligned governance, | supported by strong collaboration and a shared | ||
| a multi-agency Data and QA subgroup, and clear | |||
| roles and accountability | responsibility for outcomes. A fully data-driven approach, | ||
| escalation processes support transparent | |||
| across all partners. | with unified dashboards and shared intelligence, will enable | ||
| performance monitoring and shared ownership of | |||
| • A culture of collaboration and | informed decisions, strengthen accountability and improve | ||
| improvement across partners. | |||
| trust - joint working, supported | outcomes for children and young people with SEND. | ||
| Since Torbay joined the Safety Valve Programme in | |||
| by shared vision, openness | A fully embedded a culture of rigorous financial stewardship, | ||
| 2023 the Council has established robust and | |||
| and mutual accountability. | where every element of SEND expenditure is systematically | ||
| transparent oversight of the SEND budget through the | |||
| • Integrated data systems - | planned, scrutinised, and aligned to demonstrable | ||
| Safety Valve Programme, which places the area in a | |||
| provide a unified, accessible | very strong position moving towards our SEND | outcomes. | |
| view of need, performance | Reform Plan. Since 2023 the council has created a | ||
| The robust governance arrangements introduced since | |||
| and impact across the Torbay | new infrastructure of financial oversight and | ||
| 2023 will have matured into a highly efficient, intelligence- | |||
| partnership and wider sub- | accountability which means processes now oversee | ||
| led system. This will enable proactive rather than reactive | |||
| regional footprint. | and scrutinise all spending for SEND. Underpinned | ||
| management of resources, ensuring that investment is | |||
| • Robust performance | by strong senior accountability, with formal sign-off | ||
| targeted early, effectively, and sustainably | |||
| management and assurance | from the Chief Executive, Section 151 Officer and | ||
| arrangements - monitor | Director of Children’s Services this has meant that all | ||
| impact, drive improvement | levels of the organisation work towards carefully | ||
| and maintain accountability, | planned financial schedules for SEND, which has | ||
| including all aspects of DfE | made the very best use of resources. Indeed, this |
16 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
quarterly return through 6- weekly metrics reporting
Strategic oversight of High Needs funding - ensure HNB resources are aligned to the SEND strategic plan, focusing on early intervention, inclusion, and sufficiency of local provision.
culture of efficiently utilising the resources we have is now an established approach to the day-to-day culture to spending across Children’s Services in Torbay. Financial performance and recovery are rigorously monitored through a structured quarterly reporting framework, incorporating risk registers, RAG-rated assurance, and evidence-based progress updates against all programme conditions. Oversight is strengthened through a multi-layered governance model, including a strategic DSG dashboard, Schools Forum scrutiny, and targeted panels such as the Independent Placement Overview Panel to ensure robust challenge of high-cost decisions. Together, these arrangements provide a disciplined, data-driven approach to monitoring spend, managing risk, and ensuring progress towards DSG sustainability while meeting statutory SEND duties.
Success Measures 5. Data, Insight and Quality
Baseline
Target Metrics
Data and Insight Data and Insight Evidence of data cited in key decisions Baseline to be established Evidence of data cited in key decisions % of increase to be set once baseline established Evidence of JSNA informing commissioning
Universal adoption of shared dashboards across all partners & Data routinely used to inform decisions at all levels (strategic and operational)
Measurable improvement in partnership maturity (e.g., against a defined maturity model)
Evidence of JSNA informing commissioning
Baseline to be established % of increase to be set once baseline established Improvement Indicator Evidence of year-on-year improvement against matrix evaluation Quality Assurance Improvement Indicator Maturity Matrix baseline established Quality Assurance % of EHCPs rated silver or better 58% (above national benchmark of 31%) % of Annual Reviews graded Silver or Above (for Overall Quality) % of EHCPs rated silver or better 67% 78% % of Annual Reviews graded Silver or Above (for Overall Quality) 83%
17 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
Consistent quality and compliance in plans and provisions
Evidence of impact on outcomes and experiences
A learning system with continuous improvement
Appendix 1 : Q2 ‘Detailed Where the LAP expects to be in the next 3 years table.doc’ sets out in detail how Torbay has addressed the 43 minimum requirements on the DfE’s reform plan guidance.
| Torbay’s SEND Partnership will deliver a focused three-year reform programme underpinned by a clear theory of change: moving from a reactive, fragmented system to one that is proactive, inclusive, and integrated. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inputs | Outputs | System change | Outcomes | Impact |
| Inputs include strengthened partnership governance, embedded co-production with families, and a shared evidence base through the JSNA and data dashboards. Investment in workforce capacity, particularly the “Experts at Hand” (EaH) model, will provide timely specialist advice and build practitioner confidence. Locality delivery, Family Hubs, and joint commissioning, supported by sub-regional collaboration, form the foundation for change. | Outputs will include consistent use of the graduated response in mainstream settings, more effective multiagency pathways, improved EHCP timeliness and quality, reduced therapy waiting times, and better use of data to inform commissioning. | A shift from reactive, referral-led and fragmented services to a proactive, localitybased system that delivers earlier intervention and coordinated multiagency support. Inclusive practice embedded consistently across all settings through | We will see earlier identification of needs, reduced reliance on statutory plans, increased mainstream inclusion, fewer out-ofarea placements, improved attendance, reduced exclusions, and more consistent family experiences. | A sustainable, preventative SEND system that reduces inequalities, improves life outcomes, and delivers responsive, trusted services with more efficient use of resources. |
18 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
| This is reinforced by a whole-system approach through the Families First Partnership Programme, neighbourhood working, and integrated multi-disciplinary teams (MDTs) aligning education, health, social care, and youth justice. Shared thresholds aligned front-door arrangements, and common assessment frameworks will reduce duplication and enable earlier intervention. A refreshed Ordinarily Available Inclusive Provision (OAIP)/ Universal Offer, effective Graduated Response, SEND Reform Plan, and targeted pathways (e.g. SLCN, neurodevelopment) will drive consistency. | The EaH model will support earlier problem-solving, reducing escalation, while engagement will strengthen coproduction and trust with families. | Experts at Hand, supported by clear accountability measures. Genuine joined-up working, embedded co-production, and a trusted system across the partnership. | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Assumptions: • Partners sustain shared accountability and collaboration • Workforce capacity and skills can be built at scale • Early intervention will reduce demand overtime. • Co-production will strengthen trust, engagement and system effectiveness | External factors: • Wider system changes (e.g. LGR, ICB restructuring) influencing pace and delivery • National reforms (NHS, Children’s Social Care, curriculum) • Funding pressures in the High Needs Block • Workforce supply challenges |
4. Please upload a completed copy of the Local Partnership Maturity Assessment Tool. Torbay’s SEND system is largely at “emerging to developing” maturity, with strongest progress in co-production and governance, and earlier- stage development in data use, service delivery, workforce, and resourcing. Please see attached our assessment of where we are as a Local Area Partnership in Appendix 2.
Appendix 2: Q4 Local Partnership Maturity Assessment Tool.
19 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
5. What is the local area partnership roadmap for the next 3 years? Note: This table below is a summary of the full 3-year road map. Appendix 3: Q5 shows the full 3-year road map including milestones and success measures.
Trajectory – A child’s experience
Year 1 “People notice
Year 2 “School and services work
Year 3 “Wherever I go, I get the right support
Childs Voice
Childs Voice
Childs Voice
when I’m struggling, and I don’t have to wait as long to get
together for me, so I don’t
at the right time and I feel
have to keep
explaining
included.”
help.”
myself.”
Summary Table – 3 Year Road map
Year 1 (2026/27) – Foundation & Alignment Year 2 (2027/28) – Scaling & Systemisation Year 3 (2028/29) – Embedded & High Performing
Building Block 1. Strengthening Inclusion Across Education Settings
Year 1 (2026/27) – Foundation & Alignment Year 2 (2027/28) – Scaling & Systemisation Year 3 (2028/29) – Embedded & High Performing Milestones
- Governance reforms embedded (SLAIP)
- Locality pilots launched
- Experts at Hand (EAH) introduced
- Establish front door / single access pathway and triage model
Milestones
- Locality “families of schools” fully embedded
- Universal SEND (OAIP) offer consistent across settings
- EAH expanded
- ERP capacity expanded (primary, SEMH, ASC)
Milestones
Universal inclusive practice (OAIP) fully embedded
Comprehensive local provision network (ERP, SEMH, ASC)
EAH embedded across all settings
20 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
| • Support and training offer agreed and delivered • Strategy and SEF • ERP sufficiency review completed • LA–MAT collaboration begins • Mapping of sufficiency pressures • £1.1m mainstream SEND environment investment • Surplus capacity/falling rolls identified • EOTAS framework introduced • Post-16 pathways launched including a specially jointly commissioned project to bring down NEETs. • Travel impact baseline established | • Formal LA–MAT co-planning framework • Inclusion bases delivered via repurposed estate • Standardised quality frameworks • Clear mainstream–specialist pathways • EOTAS pathway fully embedded • Travel impact assessment standardised | • Mature LA–MAT co-planning model • Optimised estate with minimal unused capacity • Inclusion bases aligned to demographic need • Travel considerations embedded in all planning • Specialist provision used only where evidenced • Strong specialist outreach • Continuous improvement cycle | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Success measures | Measures in Year 1: baseline and early leading indicators | Measures in Year 2: improving trend / scaling measures | Measures in Year 3 / 2029 target: end-state and target | |
| metrics | ||||
| By 2029 children and young people with SEND in Torbay will experience greater belonging, earlier support and improved outcomes. We expect to see change in the following key indicators that evidence change within our system: Equitable inclusion, adequate provision, sustained attendance, and measurable outcomes • Increase % of EHCP pupils educated in mainstream settings year-on-year • Reduce number and rate of in-area independent placements • Improve availability and balanced occupancy of local specialist provision | • % of EHCP pupils educated in mainstream settings: 35.8% • In-area independent placements: 42 • % of children identified as SEN K: 13.1% • NMSS or Independent Schools – LA funded: 2.3% • Absence rates: • SEN K 13.2%; • EHCP 14.1% • Persistent absence: | • % of EHCP pupils educated in mainstream increases; 38.26% • In-area independent placements: 37 (12% reduction) • % of children identified as SEN K: 13.7% • NMSS or Independent Schools – LA funded: 2.1% • Absence rates: • SEN K 12.2%; • EHCP 13.1% • Persistent absence: | • % of EHCP pupils educated in mainstream settings: 40.72% • In-area independent placements: 31 (25% reduction from baseline) • % of children identified as SEN K: 14.2% (national) • NMSS or Independent Schools – LA funded: 2.0% • Absence rates: • SEN K 11.2%; • EHCP 12.1% • Persistent absence: • SEN K 8.2% reduction from baseline • EHCP 9.1% reduction from baseline • Suspension rates: • SEN K13% reduction from baseline • EHCP 20% reduction from baseline |
21 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
| • Increase proportion of pupils supported at SEN Support level (prevent escalation) • Reduce reliance on independent special school places • Improve attendance rates for pupils with SEND • Reduce persistent absence within the SEND cohort • Reduce fixed-term and permanent exclusions for pupils with SEND • Improved EYFS GLD • Reduce number of young people with SEND who become NEET | • SEN K 817 pupils; • EHCP 510 pupils • Suspension rates: • SEN K 18.57 (DfE explore) ; • EHCP 27.11(DfE explore) • EYFS GLD for all children – 68.5% • Young people who are SEN NEET(16-18) – 125 (March 2026) • Lead indicators include locality pilot engagement, ERP planning involvement, uptake of early intervention / EAH advice, baseline EHCP trends, and mapping of provision gaps | • SEN K 4.1% reduction; • EHCP 4.6% reduction • Suspension rates: • SEN K 7% reduction; • EHCP 10% reduction • EYFS GLD for all children 73% • Young people who are SEN NEET(16- 18)– in line with national | • EYFS GLD for all children – 77.8% • Young people who are SEN NEET(16-18) – in line with national ]• End-state measures also include reduced reliance on specialist and independent placements, highquality provision meeting standards, improved attainment / progress measures and Parent/carer satisfaction improves | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Building Block 2. Access to Specialist Support & Local Placements (EAH & AP) | |||||
| Year 1 (2026/27) – Foundation & Alignment | Year 1 (2026/27) – Foundation & Alignment | Year 2 (2027/28) – Scaling & Systemisation | Year 3 (2028/29) – Embedded & High | ||
| Performing | |||||
| Milestones • EAH model launched • Defined roles across LA, ICB, education, Family Hubs • JSNA used to identify gaps and commissioners meeting regularly to review and respond | Milestones • Fully agreed EAH delivery model • Formal SLAs/MOUs across partners • Partnership Pathway Map rolled out • EAH integrated with SEND, health, early help • All Pathways embedded • AP recommissioned into 3-tier model | Milestones • Fully embedded EAH system • Seamless integration across education, health, early help • Mature partnership governance • Fully implemented pathway infrastructure |
22 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
Early co-production
Initial SLA/MOU development
Pathways mapped (health, education, early help)
Neurodiversity pathway mapped
AP sufficiency challenges identified
SEMH locality pilot
Early workforce capacity improvements (Eps, Salt, Ot)
Recruit to SLT Advanced Practitioner role
Strengthened SENDIASS
Learning disability health checks consolidated and monitored
Early steps to ensure equitable access
Access to a range of provision to support transition to Adult Social Care.
- Expansion of registered AP capacity
- Reduced unregistered AP use
- Strengthened workforce capacity
- Consistent triage and referral thresholds
- Locality model embedded
- Structured performance framework introduced
AP system operating as preventative, tiered model
Sufficient specialist workforce aligned to demand
Locality-based equitable access
SENDIASS fully independent and embedded
Continuous improvement cycle
Success Measures
Measures in Year 1: baseline and early leading indicators
Measures in Year 2: improving trend / systemisation measures
Measures in Year 3 / 2029 target: end-state and target metrics
Workforce baseline (2025/26 FTE): SaLT 11.9; Ot 5.97; Ep 9.81 (see EaH appendix for overall costs)
Workforce baseline – 50% of recruitment complete (subject to recruitment)
Waiting times for community therapies (not including ND): 78% waiting less than 18 weeks
20-week EHCP timeliness target
Workforce baseline – 100% of recruitment complete (subject to recruitment)
Waiting times for community therapies (not including ND): 95% waiting less than 18 weeks
20-week EHCP timeliness target currently shown as 46%
Reduction in Complaints / enquiries from baseline to 6 per month (50% reduction)
Parent/carer confidence: 30% confidence rating in the annual participation survey
- Workforce capability and confidence
Recruit and retain specialist staff for EAH model
Positive feedback from settings and families on EAH
Increasing proportion of EAH time on whole school delivery
Reducing repeat referrals for the same issues
- Effective demand management through
early intervention and timely support
Reduce waiting lists for specialist support
Waiting times for community therapies (not including ND): 40% waiting less than 18 weeks
23 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
Reduce waiting times for specialist input
Increase % of EHCPs completed within 20- week statutory timescales
Shorten wait times for therapies (e.g. SaLT, Education Psychologists, CAMHS)
Reduced waiting times for specialist services (e.g. Ep, Salt, Ot)
Mainstream settings with increased access to Education Psychologists/SaLT/OT Other Effective demand management through early intervention and timely support are listed under Building Block three.
- Improved experiences, strengthened co-
production, and greater confidence in services
Improved ability for users to understand and navigate the system
Reduced complaints, disputes, and tribunal cases
Increased practitioner confidence in inclusive practice
Improved satisfaction among families, schools, and practitioners Other Improved experiences, strengthened co- production, and greater confidence in services are listed under Building Block three.
20-week EHCP timeliness baseline: 29%
Complaints / enquiries baseline: average 12 per month (6 MP enquiries and 6 complaints) – May 2026
Teacher confidence in meeting SEND needs: 30% increase in confidence rating
Number and proportion of children and young people with SEND who are EOTAS:
national (46% currently)
Reduction in Complaints / enquiries from baseline to 9 per month:
Parent/carer confidence: 20% confidence rating in the annual participation survey
Teacher confidence in meeting SEND needs: 15% increase in confidence
Number and proportion of children and young people with SEND who are EOTAS:
EOTAS 35 (>2%)
End-state delivery measures also include a fully embedded EAH system, stable workforce capacity and retention, reduced complaints / disputes / tribunals, and consistent accountability and performance reporting
Workforce stability and retention improve, coverage of EAH services across settings increases, reporting and performance monitoring become routine
Parent/carer feedback baseline to be established following June 2026 survey
Teacher confidence in meeting SEND needs: baseline to be established in year 1
Number and proportion of children and young people with SEND who are EOTAS:
EOTAS 40 (2%) EOTAS 51(2.7%) %of EHCPs Jan 2026
Mainstream settings with increased access to Education Psychologists / SaLT / OT
Greater proportion of partners operating under formal agreements
Early lead indicators include partner engagement in EAH design, baseline waiting times for EPS / SaLT / Ot, AP demand and unregistered AP use, co-production activity, and improved user ability to navigate the system
24 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
| Building Block 3. System Leadership, Partnership Collaboration & Co-Production | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 (2026/27) – Foundation & Alignment | Year 1 (2026/27) – Foundation & Alignment | Year 2 (2027/28) – Scaling & Systemisation | Year 3 (2028/29) – Embedded & High | ||||
| Performing | |||||||
| Milestones • Early co-development of Universal Offer (OAIP) • Identification of variation in practice • Initial engagement structures (MATs, PCF, CYP) • Family Liaison role introduced • Co-production strategy agreed • Early rollout of EAH for early intervention • SLAIP governance structures in place • Locality pilot development • SENDIASS expansion and baseline governance • Early Years & Post-16 pathway frameworks • Initial strategic commissioning alignment | Milestones • Universal Offer (OAIP) finalised and implemented • National Inclusion Standards embedded • Routine structured engagement with MATs, PCF, CYP • ’Your Voice in Action’ introduced • Co-production benchmark adopted • EAH expanded across all localities • “Families of schools” model established • Locality Profiles of Need developed • Scaled training and evidence-based interventions • Emerging Leaders of SEND network | Milestones • Universal Offer (OAIP) fully embedded (0–25) • Consistent high-quality inclusive practice • Co-production fully embedded and representative • ’Your Voice in Action’ fully operational • EAH fully operational as early intervention model • Locality model fully embedded and data driven • Workforce confident and delivering evidencebased practice • Leaders of SEND network driving improvement | |||||
| Success Measures | Measures in Year 1: | Measures in Year 2: | Measures in Year 3 / 2029 target: end-state and target metrics | ||||
| baseline and early | improving trend / | ||||||
| leading indicators | embedding measures | ||||||
| (3) Effective demand management through early intervention and timely support • Stabilise or reduce EHCP requests • Lower proportion of requests progressing to statutory EHCPs • Increase early support at SEN Support level without escalation • Strengthen use of the graduated response, including OAP | • Number of EHCNAs: 399 (full year 2025) • Number of EHCNAs resulting in plan: 251/399 = 63% • Number of pupils identified as SEN K: 13.1% (2024/25) • Number of mainstream schools using Torbay OAP tools: baseline to | • Number of EHCNAs forecast to rise initially • Reduce the proportion of requests progressing to EHCP issue 50% • Number of pupils identified as SEN K: 16% | • Number of EHCNAs forecast to rise initially and then stabilise at 495 from 2028 to 2029 • Reduce the proportion of requests progressing to EHCP issue to 60% • Increase in the percentage of SEN K to national norms • Torbay OAP tools: increasing to 100% by 2029 • Increased number of co-production activities by stakeholder type • Increased attendance at events and parent / carer and young people surveys |
25 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
Number of mainstream schools using Torbay OAP tools: 85% of mainstream schools using by September 2027
Co-production activities and attendance at engagement events / family surveys: increase on 2026 baseline
Acting on the voice of families measured through number of “Your Voice in Action” reports published in 2026 and parent/carer feedback
Increased consistency in school self-evaluation of SEND practice
Growth in locality- based activity and collaboration
Increase in early intervention (group / advice vs referrals)
Reduction in repeat referrals and escalation patterns
Co-production embedded as
Maintained number of “Your Voice in Action” reports published annually and ongoing parent/carer feedback
End-state delivery measures also include majority of need met without escalation, reduction trends in EHCP assessments / specialist referrals / out-of- area placements, and strong family and CYP satisfaction and trust
Universal Offer actively used across all settings
Reduction in repeat referrals and escalation patterns
Other Effective demand management through early intervention and timely support are listed under Building Block two above (5) Improved experiences, strengthened co-
be agreed in year 1 (OAP introduced by September 2026)
Co-production activities and attendance at engagement events / family surveys: 2026 baseline to be established
Acting on the voice of families measured through number of “Your Voice in Action” reports published in 2026 and parent/carer feedback
Early lead indicators include early-stage identification, engagement levels across partners, participation in co- production activity, use of early advice versus referral, SENDIASS access and satisfaction baseline, and early stakeholder feedback on pathways
production, and greater confidence in services
Co-production embedded as standard practice across all partners
Increased and more diverse participation from families and young people
Regular and meaningful use of “Your voice in Action” to demonstrate impact and responsiveness
Other Improved experiences, strengthened co- production, and greater confidence in services are listed under Building Block 2.
26 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
| standard practice across partners, with sustained and broader participation • Workforce confidence improving and regular use of “Your Voice in Action” | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Building Block 4. Encouraging Inclusive Culture & Behaviours | |||||||
| Year 1 (2026/27) – Foundation & Alignment | Year 1 (2026/27) – Foundation & Alignment | Year 2 (2027/28) – Scaling & Systemisation | Year 3 (2028/29) – Embedded & High | ||||
| Performing | |||||||
| Milestones • Establish shared partnership leadership & governance • Ensure representation from early years, schools, MATs, FE • Begin development of shared data dashboards • Partnership maturity matrix introduced • Early work on shared accountability and expectations | Milestones • Strengthened partnership governance • Shared dashboards used routinely • Increased alignment of behaviours and expectations • Consistent partnership engagement across all settings | Milestones • Mature, self-sustaining inclusive culture • High-quality shared data driving behaviour • Strong cross system accountability • Embedded inclusive behaviours across all settings | |||||
| Success Measures | Measures in Year 1: | Measures in Year 2: | Measures in Year 3 / 2029 target: end-state and target metrics | ||||
| baseline and early leading | improving trend / | ||||||
| indicators | integration measures | ||||||
| 1. Data, Insight and Quality • Universal adoption of shared dashboards across all partners & Data routinely used to inform decisions at all levels (strategic and operational) | • Evidence of data cited in key decisions: baseline to be established in year 1 • Evidence of JSNA informing | • Evidence of data cited in key decisions: % increase to be set once baseline established | • Evidence of data cited in key decisions: % increase to be set once baseline established • Evidence of JSNA informing commissioning: % increase to be set once baseline established |
27 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
Measurable improvement in partnership maturity (e.g., against a defined maturity model)
Consistent quality and compliance in plans and provisions
Evidence of impact on outcomes and experiences
A learning system with continuous improvement
Evidence of JSNA informing commissioning: % increase to be set once baseline established.
Improvement indicator: evidence of year-on-year improvement against matrix evaluation
67% of EHCPs rated silver or better:
% of annual reviews rated silver or better: 83%
Improved alignment between SEND and wider education priorities
commissioning: baseline to be established
Improvement indicator: maturity matrix baseline established
58% of EHCPs rated silver or better:
% of annual reviews rated silver or better: 78%
Early lead indicators include governance board oversight, clear roles and accountability, attendance and participation in SLAIP, reporting frequency / quality, early dashboard use, and evidence of escalation and resolution processes
Improvement indicator: evidence of year-on-year improvement against matrix evaluation
67% of EHCPs rated silver or better:
% of annual reviews rated silver or better: 83%
End-state delivery measures also include, fully integrated real-time dashboards, improved system- wide performance indicators, and inclusive culture embedded across all partners and settings. Evidence of shared accountability in decisions and Universal adoption of shared dashboards across partners
6. What will the local area partnership deliver in the first year? The 2026–27 SEND Local Delivery Plan sets out a comprehensive first-year programme structured across four building blocks, focused on improving inclusion, early intervention, sufficiency, and system leadership.
In Building Block 1, the priority is strengthening inclusion across education settings. Key outcomes include implementing the Ordinarily Available Inclusive Provision (OAIP) in all schools, expanding specialist capacity through ERPs and inclusion bases, and improving access to
28 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
tailored pathways such as NEET support. Early milestones focus on co-production, feasibility, and governance, moving to full implementation and system-wide consistency by Q4. Alongside this, improved transport planning and travel training aim to reduce costs and increase independence.
Building Block 2 focuses on improving access to specialist support and reducing reliance on independent placements. The Experts at Hand (EAH) model is introduced and scaled, alongside embedding a consistent graduated response across settings. The programme also prioritises increasing local capacity, strengthening ASC provision, and improving placement decision-making through locality-based approaches. By the end of the year, there are expected to more children supported locally.
Building Block 3 strengthens early intervention, participation, and system quality. A consistent Universal Offer and Early Intervention Framework are developed, with a strong emphasis on earlier identification of need. Participation and co-production are embedded through structured feedback loops (“You said, we did”), alongside improved pathways for post-16 and preparation for adulthood. System leadership and commissioning are increasingly data-led, transparent, and collaborative.
Building Block 4 underpins delivery through stronger governance, shared data, and leadership. A refreshed SLAIP structure, a single shared dataset, and embedded lived experience ensure more effective decision-making and accountability.
Overall, Q2 focuses on design and co-production, Q3 on implementation, and Q4 on embedding and demonstrating impact, with clear progress toward a more inclusive, efficient, and responsive SEND system.
• Appendix 4: Q6 details the full plan for year 1 including measures and expenditure per quarter that aligns with the activity. • Appendix 5: Q6 Torbay SEND Sufficiency Placement Plan 2026–2030 • Appendix 6: Q6 Experts at Hand Offer principles and plan – This document outlines how Torbay plan to implement the EaH offer. 7. How will the local area partnership deliver the first-year plan?
The local partnership will deliver its first-year SEND Reform Plan through strong programme infrastructure, clear governance, and enhanced organisational capacity across corporate functions to support effective implementation. Delivery will be led by an experienced, full-time Programme Manager, currently overseeing the Priority Impact Plan, ensuring continuity as this transitions into a single, aligned SEND Reform Plan from September. This provides established programme discipline, clear accountability and a strong delivery foundation. Additional targeted project support will be deployed where required, particularly for significant transformation activity such as the Experts at Hand Offer, ensuring key programmes are effectively mobilised and delivered.
29 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
Governance arrangements will be refreshed to strengthen strategic oversight, focusing on delivery against milestones, robust performance management and value for money. This will be supported by strengthened corporate functions, including finance, commissioning and performance, to ensure effective planning, monitoring and resource alignment. HR capacity will be critical in scaling the workforce required to deliver reform priorities, particularly the expansion of the Experts at Hand model, ensuring timely recruitment, retention and workforce development.
Key enablers will be the development of system-wide data and analytical capability and wider sub-regional development to deliver economies of scale and reduce inequalities. Torbay, Devon and Plymouth will be exploring potential opportunities for sub-regional collaboration and alignment.
Further considerations are being given to commissioning arrangements, across wider partnerships, to embed SEND within contracts, and ensure coherence with Family Hubs, Families First and MDT delivery models.
A dedicated lead officer will also support capital planning and sufficiency, ensuring the system has the right provision in the right place.
Together, these enablers will ensure the partnership has the capability, capacity and infrastructure required to deliver impactful and sustainable reform in year one.
8. Other funding Local Authorities.
Block Transfers: If you have made a block transfer (Schools Block to High Needs Block) for 26-27, please set out how your plans for this funding align with the activities outlined above.
Torbay is not proceeding with a Schools Block to High Needs Block transfer for 2026–27. This decision was formally agreed by Torbay Schools Forum following detailed consideration of financial impact and affordability.
Capital: We have announced at least £3 billion in high needs capital between 2026-27 and 2029-30 to support children and young people (CYP) with SEND, or those requiring alternative provision (AP). We also welcome innovative uses of high needs capital to drive inclusion, for example, investment in assistive technology for use in mainstream settings.
Over the last 4 years, Torbay LA has been investing in SEND provision through large, targeted capital projects that have increased capacity in special schools and ERPs. Major capital projects have included the re-provision of the STEPs provision at Paignton Academy and enhancements to their in-house SEND offer; the expansion of Mayfield School by 25 places; the expansion of Mayfield Chestnut and Sixth
30 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
Day provision; the relocation of Mayfield Sixth Form College to support expansion; improvements to The Harbour at Brixham College; and the Prosper and Supported Internship provisions at Brunel Academy.
Part of the Council’s strategy has also been to allocate capital funding to mainstream schools across the Bay to enhance their in-house provision. The Council has allocated £1m from the HNPCA grant to support a Locality Model to include all schools and form locality Clusters for our three grammar schools and all Post 16 providers. The locality model focuses on the concepts of ‘predictable’ and ‘exceptional’ SEND, as well as ‘Ordinarily Available Inclusive Provision’ within each cluster. All schools were able to bid for Locality funding to develop new or enhance existing in-house SEND provision. Projects ranged from providing sensory spaces and sensory gardens to the re-purposing of surplus accommodation to SEND provision.
The next phase of Torbay’s SEND Capital Plan 2026-2030 will focus on delivering the re-designation of Combe Pafford School; the establishment of 3 primary ERPs in Torquay and Paignton; additional secondary SEMH provision and further development of The Nest at South Devon College.
The accommodation analysis for the primary ERPs will start with a review of any surplus accommodation resulting from falling rolls. This review will be mindful of ensuring that provision will be sustainable even when primary numbers recover.
The SEND Capital Plan will be managed through a Project Board reporting to the Council’s Capital and Growth Board and the Children’s Services Transformation Board. The Project Board will include officers from Children’s Services, Finance, Procurement and Planning to ensure that capital projects are managed effectively and deliver value for money.
Key responsibilities of the SEND Capital Project Board will be:
- Strategic Planning and Portfolio Management:
- Scope Definition and Feasibility:
- Stakeholder Engagement:
- Risk Management:
- Execution and Monitoring:
- Governance and Compliance:
- Closeout and Evaluation:
Appendix 7: Q8 SEND Capital Plan 2026 – 2030 give further details of our capital investment.
Appendix 8: Q8 Financial information for SEND reform plan 24-25 to 27-28
31 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
9. System partner and stakeholder engagement, and co-production.
Our Partnership Engagement Day, Education Conference and workshops to date have informed the development of this plan. These events have been attended by children and young people, parent carers and practitioners from across health, education, social care and the voluntary and community sector. Key messages highlighted the importance of early help, prevention and clear pathways; the critical role of workforce capacity and confidence; and the need for flexible, personalised support, including accessible alternative provision. Our local area partnership will adopt a structured, inclusive and transparent approach to engaging system partners and stakeholders in both the development and implementation of the SEND Reform Plan. This approach is aligned with the Genuine Partnerships Four Cornerstones (co-production, communication, valuing participation and working together) and supports Pillars 1, 2, 3 and 5 of the SEND maturity matrix. Engagement will be ongoing, inclusive and impact focused, underpinned by early involvement, accessible communication and clear feedback loops. A refreshed SEND Communications Strategy provides a framework for delivering the right information, at the right time, through the right channels, recognising communication as both a strategic and cultural priority. A “network of networks” approach will ensure information reaches families through trusted routes, including schools, early years settings and community networks. This is strengthened through Your Voice in Action, our partnership wide framework demonstrating how feedback leads to change. Feedback will be systematically gathered, analysed and used to inform decisions, with impact shared through newsletters, digital platforms, quarterly partnership summaries and an annual Local Offer report. Engagement with Education Partners
We will build on established engagement structures to involve education partners in both development and delivery, including:
- Half-termly school leader briefings and video updates
- SENDCo forums, briefings and newsletters
- Schools Forum, Early Years Forum, STASS (Strategic Group for Special School Heads), LEIB (Local Education and Inclusion Board) and TAPHs (Torbay Association of Primary Heads) locality groups
- RISE workstreams linked to education strategy and workforce development
- Torbay Education Conference
These mechanisms support collaborative development of inclusive practice, early intervention and place-based working.
32 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
Engagement with alternative provision, FE and post-16 providers, including those outside the local area, will be delivered through provider networks, commissioning relationships and structured transition processes, ensuring their involvement in pathway design and delivery, inclusion in locality forums and targeted workshops to improve understanding, access and pathways.
Engagement with Children, Young People and Families Co-production is central and will include:
- SEND Family Voice Torbay (Parent Carer Forum) through forums and co-production activity
- SEND Youth Forum and engagement within education settings
- SEND Pledge workshops across schools and colleges
- Surveys to shape priorities, including the current communications survey
- Participation through community events (e.g. Fair Play Day)
- A Family Liaison role supporting engagement in school and community settings
- Engagement with parents/carers and young people on services for people with Learning Disability and neurodiversity services
To widen participation and ensure inclusivity, the partnership will:
- Provide nondigital engagement options, including face-to-face sessions, paper surveys and telephone engagement
- Offer accessible formats such as easy read, visual materials and translated information
- Hold engagement sessions in familiar community venues at flexible times
- Actively engage young people in post-16 and alternative provision settings
- Work with schools and partners to identify and engage families less likely to participate
This approach ensures engagement is meaningful, inclusive and sustained, enabling effective partnership working and improved outcomes for children and young people with SEND.
Appendix 9: Q1 and Q9 Co Production Requirements and Your Voice in Action table
33 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
10. Risks and Mitigations
| Risk | Impact | Likelihood | RA | Mitigation | Residual Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Partner Engagement and System Alignment, coproduction and trust Leads: SLAIP Independent Chair Parent Carer Forum Risk: Education, health and care partners, families and young people are not consistently aligned or meaningfully involved in SEND reform. | Impact Level: Critical a) Fragmented service delivery: Inconsistent multiagency engagement leads to disjointed planning, with families navigating multiple uncoordinated pathways. b) Inconsistent implementation of reforms: neven partner buy-in results in variable adoption of SEND reforms and inequitable provision and outcomes. c) Reduced effectiveness of early intervention: Poor alignment delays identification and response, increasing reliance on specialist and statutory services. d) Pressure on statutory processes and resources: Misalignment increases demand for EHCPs and disputes, driving caseloads, delays, and backlogs. e) Diminished outcomes for children and young people: Lack of coordinated input reduces the effectiveness of support, impacting progress, wellbeing, and independence. f) Erosion of trust with families and stakeholders: Inconsistent messaging, duplication, and gaps in provision undermine confidence in the system. g) Inequalities in voice and access: nderrepresented groups risk further marginalisation. h) Inefficient use of funding: Weak shared priorities and commissioning lead to duplication, gaps, and poor value for money. i) Reforms lack credibility: changes may not reflect lived experience ) Difficulty meeting statutory duties and inspection expectations: Misalignment increases risk of noncompliance and adverse inspection outcomes. k) Slower pace of transformation: Weak alignment delays decisions and delivery, reducing momentum and progress. | Possible | a) Strengthen multi-agency governance with clear roles, decision rights and escalation. Ensure senior representation with delegated decision-making powers. b) Agree and embed shared vision and priorities Co-produce a clear SEND strategy and plan with partners and families. Set measurable outcomes owned by all agencies. c) Formalise partnership commitments Strengthen oint commissioning and resources Agree shared priorities, Mo s and aligned organisational plans. a) Improve communication and engagement Establish regular strategic and operational forums. Provide clear, consistent messaging on reforms. b) Develop integrated working practices Promote multi-agency pathways, shared protocols, and integrated teams. Embed keyworker lead professional roles. c) Build workforce capability and culture Deliver joint training on SEND, inclusion, and graduated response. Promote shared language and understanding. d) se data for alignment and accountability Implement shared dashboards on outcomes, demand, and timeliness. se data to challenge variation and drive improvement. e) Embed co-production in design, delivery and review Involve families and young people in design and review.Target seldomheard groups and build trusted relationship-based support and close the you said, we did loop. f) Escalation and performance management Define escalation routes for disengagement. Link performance to governance and contractual levers. g) Phased implementation with pilots Test approaches locally before scaling. se learning to refine and build confidence. h) Align with inspection expectations Review readiness against Ofsted C C framework. se findings to drive improvement. | Impact: remains at critical Even with strong mitigations in place, the impact remains high because SEND reform depends on sustained multi-agency alignment. If engagement drops, consequences (e.g. poor outcomes for children, statutory pressures, inspection risk) are still significant. Likelihood: reduces to unlikely With governance, shared accountability, and embed coproduction, the likelihood reduces from possible to unlikely. The risk is more controlled, but not eliminated due to System complexity (multiple partners with different priorities) Workforce pressures and turnover External policy and funding changes Low trust in the system |
34 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
| Risk | Impact | Likelihood | RA | Mitigation | Residual Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2. Financial pressure and long-term sustainability Lead: Senior Responsible Officer SEND Reforms Risk: High Needs funding pressures and demand growth limit investment in early intervention and inclusive provision. | Impact Level: Critical Reduced early-help investment increases reliance on high-cost specialist provision. Deficits, inflation and placement costs restrict reform capacity. Provision may become inconsistent, affecting outcomes for CYP. Financial instability increases scrutiny and strains partnership decisions. | Possible | a) Strengthen financial governance and oversight Implement robust High Needs Block monitoring, forecasting, and regular reporting through governance boards. b) Develop a sustainable financial strategy Agree a medium long term SEND financial recovery and sustainability plan aligned to reform priorities. c) Prioritise early intervention investment Redirect resources toward preventative, inclusive approaches to reduce future demand and costs. d) Expand local inclusive provision Increase mainstream capacity and targeted support to reduce reliance on high-cost placements. e) Strengthen oint commissioning and pooled budgets Align funding across education, health, and care to maximise impact and reduce duplication. f) Improve demand management Strengthen graduated response and thresholds to ensure appropriate use of EHCPs and specialist provision. g) Enhance value for money and efficiency Review high-cost placements, contracts, and services to ensure cost-effectiveness. h) Develop workforce capacity Invest in training and retention to reduce reliance on costly external provision. i) se data and modelling Implement predictive modelling to understand demand drivers and inform investment decisions. ) Engage partners in financial accountability Ensure shared ownership of cost pressures and savings across the system. k) Seek external funding and opportunities Maximise grants, transformation funding, and regional collaboration opportunities. l) Align with regulatory and recovery frameworks Ensure plans meet DfE expectations (e.g., Safety Valve Delivering Better Value programmes where relevant). | Impact: remains at critical Financial pressure remains a critical risk due to scale of demand and statutory duties. Failure would significantly affect service delivery and outcomes. Likelihood: reduced to unlikely Mitigations reduce risk but the likelihood remains elevated due to Ongoing demand growth External funding constraints Inflation and placement cost pressures Limited short-term ability to reduce statutory demand |
35 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
| Risk | Impact | Likelihood | RA | Mitigation | Residual Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3. Workforce capacity, capability and change fatigue Lead: Senior Responsible Officer SEND Reforms Risk: SEND reform requires new ways of working from an already stretched workforce across education, health, and social care. Skills gaps, recruitment challenges, and change fatigue may undermine implementation | Impact Level: Critical a) Slower reform delivery: Limited capacity delays implementation and reduces momentum. b) Inconsistent practice quality: Skills gaps lead to variable support across services. c) Reduced early intervention: Workforce pressures limit timely, preventative support. d) Increased statutory pressure: Capacity gaps contribute to delays in assessments and EHCP processes. e) Recruitment and retention challenges: Vacancies and turnover reduce stability and continuity. f) Loss of expertise: Reliance on temporary staff weakens consistency and organisational knowledge. g) Workforce wellbeing impacts: High workloads and change fatigue increase burnout and absence. h) Reduced engagement with reform: Fatigue and low confidence limit buy-in and culture change. i) Weak multi-agency working: Capacity and skills variation hinder collaboration. ) Increased cost pressures: Greater reliance on agency staff raises costs. k) Poorer outcomes for C P: Delays and inconsistency impact progress, wellbeing, and independence. Compliance and inspection risk: Workforce pressures increase risk of missed timelines and negative outcomes. | Possible | a) Develop a clear multi-agency workforce strategy Align SEND reform priorities with a multi-agency workforce plan, including capacity modelling and role development. b) Strengthen recruitment and retention Implement targeted recruitment campaigns, retention incentives, and career development pathways. c) Invest in training and development Deliver joint SEND training (e.g. graduated response, inclusion, EHCP quality) to build skills and confidence. d) Promote new roles and ways of working Embed keyworker lead practitioner roles and multidisciplinary team approaches. e) Improve workload management Review processes and streamline systems to reduce administrative burden and free up practitioner time. f) Support workforce wellbeing Implement wellbeing support, supervision, and manageable caseload expectations to reduce burnout. g) se temporary capacity strategically se agency or interim staff to address short-term gaps while building permanent capacity. h) Strengthen leadership and change management Equip leaders to support teams through change, reinforce priorities, and maintain engagement. i) Enhance multi-agency working Provide joint forums, shared protocols, and co-location virtual working to improve collaboration. ) Leverage digital and process improvements se digital tools to improve efficiency (e.g. case management systems, shared records where appropriate). k) Build specialist capacity in mainstream settings pskill school-based staff to reduce reliance on external specialists. l) Monitor workforce data and risks Track vacancies, turnover, caseloads, and training uptake to identify and respond to risks early. . | Impact: reduced to moderate Workforce limitations would still significantly affect delivery, quality, and outcomes if they materialise. Likelihood: reduced to unlikely Reduced through workforce planning and investment, but remains elevated due to National workforce shortages Ongoing demand pressures Time needed to build skills and capacity |
36 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
| Risk | Impact | Likelihood | RA | Mitigation | Residual Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4. Pace and deliverability of reform Lead: Senior Responsible Officer SEND Reforms The scale and ambition of the reform plan exceed local delivery capacity Risk that Local government reorganisation could impact on capacity to deliver the reforms Risk that the ICB restructure and the requirements for IMPR and neighbourhood working could impact on resources to deliver the SEND reform Plan. Risk that the Adult Social Care Section 7 agreement changes and more specifically the move of the service back into the council could impact on capacity to deliver other significant change plans across Torbay. | Impact Level: Critical Slower reform delivery: Programme scale exceeds capacity, causing delays and loss of momentum. Partial or inconsistent implementation: Priorities delivered unevenly, limiting overall impact. Reduced quality of delivery: Time pressures lead to superficial or poorly embedded changes. Loss of strategic focus: Competing priorities (LGR, ICB restructure, neighbourhood working) divert leadership and resources. Disruption from system change: Organisational restructuring delays decisions and disrupts continuity. Reduced partner capacity: Partners prioritise other transformation programmes, weakening alignment. Programme slippage risk: Missed milestones threaten delivery timelines and outcomes. Workforce strain and fatigue: Multiple changes increase pressure and reduce effectiveness. Inefficient resource use: Overextension leads to duplication, rework, and wasted effort. Reduced stakeholder confidence: Limited progress undermines trust in delivery. Inspection and regulatory risk: Insufficient progress may result in adverse Ofsted C C outcomes. Limited impact for C P: Delays and inconsistency reduce improvements in outcomes and experience. | Possible | Prioritise and phase delivery Sequence reforms into clear phases, focusing on highest-impact priorities first. Establish strong programme governance Implement clear oversight, milestones, and accountability through a dedicated programme board. Develop a realistic delivery plan Align scope with available capacity, with clear timelines, dependencies, and critical paths. Align with wider system change Integrate SEND reform with local government reorganisation, ICB restructuring, and neighbourhood working plans. Maintain senior leadership focus Secure ongoing commitment and visibility from senior leaders across partners. Strengthen programme management capacity Allocate dedicated programme and project management resources to drive delivery. se phased pilots and test-and-learn approaches Pilot key initiatives locally before scaling, using learning to refine delivery. Monitor progress and adapt Track delivery against milestones and adjust plans in response to risks, capacity, and feedback. Manage dependencies and risks proactively Identify and mitigate risks linked to external programmes and system changes. Support workforce through change Provide clear communication, training, and change support to maintain engagement and reduce fatigue. Ensure partner alignment and capacity planning Regularly review partner capacity and reprioritise activity where needed. Communicate progress transparently Share updates with stakeholders to maintain confidence and momentum. | Impact: reduced to moderate The scale of reform and external system changes mean failure would still affect delivery and outcomes. Likelihood: remains at possible A realistic phased plan and effective governance reduces risk, but competing transformation programmes and finite leadership capacity remain a concern. Risk remains elevated due to Competing system-wide transformation programmes Structural changes (LGR, ICB) Finite workforce and leadership capacity . |
37 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
11. Dependencies
The Torbay SEND Local Area Partnership’s proposed future state reflects the national ambition set out in the Schools White Paper: Every Child Achieving and Thriving, shifting toward an integrated, locality-based, child-centred system. Central to this approach is early identification, joined-up delivery, and shared accountability across education, health and care. Torbay’s roadmap recognises that delivery is interdependent with wider reforms and must align across shared workforce, environments, and cohorts of children and families to avoid siloed practice. A whole-system approach is being delivered through the Families First Partnership Programme, neighbourhood working and integrated neighbourhood multi-disciplinary teams (MDTs), bringing together education, health, social care and youth justice at a local level to create a seamless integrated offer for families. Family Help, MDT and Family Hub working will enable services to organise around the child and family, supporting earlier intervention, reducing escalation and inequalities. This model aligns closely with Torbay embedding SEND expertise within MDTs, aligning thresholds and front-door arrangements, and adopting shared assessment frameworks to minimise duplication and improve outcomes. National changes to curriculum and assessment will influence inclusive practice in mainstream settings and how outcomes are measured. The partnership will work with schools, trusts and system leaders to respond to changes, including how this may influence the delivery of our experts at hand offer to ensure consistent implementation in schools and colleges for students with SEND Alignment with NHS 10 Year Health Plan and the Integrated Care System (ICS) is a key priority. Timely access to therapies and mental health services is critical to SEND outcomes, and Torbay is strengthening joint commissioning with the Integrated Care Board (ICB), introducing shared performance metrics and exploring pooled or aligned budgets. This supports coordinated workforce planning and improves system resilience. Integration with the Best Start in Life agenda and Family Hub network further enhances early identification, parent support and consistent early years pathways.
SEND reform is also aligned with local priorities including school place planning, curriculum reform, and youth justice. The use of surplus school capacity to expand inclusive mainstream provision demonstrates a proactive, place-based approach. Stronger links with youth justice services ensure SEND is central to prevention strategies, particularly for children at risk of exclusion or exploitation. However, key risks remain. NHS and Educational psychologist workforce capacity and competing priorities may impact delivery of integrated health support. Local Government Reorganisation (LGR) could disrupt leadership, governance and commissioning continuity. There is also a risk of misalignment between SEND, Family Help, school led and Best Start programmes, potentially creating gaps or duplication. Workforce instability and the complexity of coordinating multiple reforms add further challenge.
38 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
To mitigate these risks, Torbay is prioritising strong system leadership, shared governance and coordinated oversight and pan Local Authority working. Formal links between SEND governance and the ICB, alongside joint leadership of MDT and Hub development, will ensure alignment and accountability. Transitional arrangements will protect leadership continuity during LGR, supported by clear governance structures. Shared workforce planning, cross-sector training and co-location within locality hubs will strengthen collaboration. Coordination will be achieved through integrated performance frameworks, shared data systems and partnership arrangements. Stakeholder engagement and co-production with families, schools and practitioners underpin system design and delivery. Leadership forums spanning SEND, Family Help, Best Start and youth justice will actively manage interdependencies.
Contingency planning includes ongoing review of dependencies, flexible commissioning and scenario planning for workforce pressures. This proactive, system-wide approach will support a resilient SEND future state that is fully aligned with wider reforms, maximises shared resources, and improves outcomes for children and families. Appendix 10: Q11 Detailed Dependencies Risks and Opportunities provides more detail on:
a) Dependency areas including additional local/national reforms, b) The potential impact on the timelines, resources, & outcomes and, c) The expanded management & mitigation actions, including contingency planning, stakeholder engagement, and adaptive
governance. Section 3 – Monitoring and Evaluation
12. How will the local area partnership know delivery is on track?
Monitoring tools and processes Progress in delivering Torbay’s SEND strategy will be tracked through a comprehensive, data-driven performance framework that enables timely oversight, challenge and improvement across the system. Our central SEND operational dashboard will be further developed to bring together key data from education, health and care into a single, accessible view. This dashboard will be used routinely by operational teams to monitor delivery milestones, identify emerging patterns in demand, and support proactive engagement with schools, settings and service leads. A clearly defined set of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), aligned to the strategic priorities and outcomes framework, will underpin monitoring arrangements. These KPIs will be reviewed 6-weekly by the SEND Local Area Improvement Partnership (SLAIP) Board and relevant partnership
39 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
groups to support informed decision-making on priorities, resourcing and service delivery. Data will provide both system-level and local insight, enabling leaders to identify variation, target support and drive consistency.
The partnership will use data across four key domains:
Demand: including volume and trends in EHCP requests for assessment, timeliness of decision-making, identification rates in early years and schools, and emerging patterns of need.
Service delivery: such as sufficiency and occupancy of local provision, deployment of specialist services (e.g. Speech and Language Therapy), delivery of SEN Support, and progress in developing alternative and inclusive provision.
Service quality: including parent and carer satisfaction, feedback from children and young people, complaints and tribunal activity, timeliness and quality of EHCPs, and effectiveness of co-production.
Outcomes and outputs: including attendance, exclusions, attainment and progress, preparation for adulthood indicators, and successful transitions between phases and into adulthood.
This structured approach will ensure a clear line of sight between strategic intent, operational delivery and impact on children, young people and families.
Feedback and adaptation mechanisms Alongside quantitative data, the partnership will embed strong qualitative feedback loops to ensure that lived experience informs ongoing improvement. Regular engagement will take place with parent carer forums, children and young people’s participation groups, and education, health and care practitioners through established networks and partnership boards.
Co-production will be embedded as a core principle, ensuring that children, young people and families are actively involved in shaping priorities, reviewing progress and designing solutions. Feedback will be gathered through a range of mechanisms, including surveys, focus groups, case audits and direct engagement, with clear processes for demonstrating how this input influences change.
Performance data and stakeholder feedback will be reviewed together at the Data and Quality Assurance Sub-group, SEND Reform Plan Sub- group, the Communication and Engagement Monitoring and Oversight Group and the SLAIP board, enabling triangulation of evidence to understand both what is working well and where improvement is needed. This will support a dynamic and responsive system, where learning is continuously applied to refine delivery approaches, address variation and respond to changing demand.
Through this integrated approach to monitoring, feedback and adaptation, Torbay will ensure that SEND reform remains focused on delivering meaningful, measurable improvements in outcomes, experience and value for money.
40 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
13. Reporting to DfE
Using the attached data template, the local area partnership is required to provide quarterly data returns to DfE against selected key metrics. DfE will, in turn, provide quarterly data reports with visualised analysis and benchmarking that will support your local delivery, monitoring and evaluation. This will include data the department holds on Attendance, Exclusions, and Unauthorised absence.
Appendix 11: Q13 Torbay Local SEND Reform Plan Data Submission v1.1 19 June 2026
Section 4 – Governance
14. How will the local area partnership ensure delivery of plans remain on track?
Torbay’s Local Area Partnership is fully committed to delivering a high-quality, inclusive and sustainable SEND system that improves outcomes and experiences for our children, young people and their families. Strong, shared leadership and governance arrangements are in place across all system partners, underpinned by clearly defined and mutually understood lines of accountability. These arrangements ensure that the Local Authority, Integrated Care Board, education sector (including early years, schools, multi-academy trusts and further education), and wider partners operate as a collective system, taking joint responsibility for delivery, impact and ensuring best use of resources.
Formal representation from across the education sector is embedded within partnership governance structures, with clear links to Schools Forum and wider sector networks, ensuring strategic alignment, and effective two-way communication across all settings. Partnership working is further strengthened through shared, high-quality data, including integrated dashboards and a partnership maturity framework, which provide a consistent and transparent understanding of performance, progress, and system effectiveness. Alignment with other national initiatives and changes is secured through the linked governance with the multi-agency Transformation Board.
Further exploration of wider shared governance arrangements, across a sub-regional footprint will be explored, to ensure effective monitoring and evaluation of impact from shared resources and approaches.
Operational leadership for the SEND Reform Plan is delivered through the Senior Responsible Owner (SRO), who is accountable for ensuring milestones are met and maintaining oversight of progress, and ensuring alignment across all partners. Collectively, these arrangements support a culture of transparency, co-production and continuous improvement, ensuring the partnership remains focused on delivering measurable and sustained improvements for children and young people with SEND.
41 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
| Governance | Purpose/ Responsibilities | Membership | Cadence | Decision Rights | Escalation Route | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mechanism | |||||||||
| Torbay SEND Local Area Improvement Partnership (SLAIP) Board | The SLAIP Board provides strategic leadership, oversight, and assurance for delivering the Local Area SEND Reform Plan and associated priorities, including strategic oversight of the High Needs Block and the priority actions set out in the 2025–26 Priority Impact Plan. It operates within a clear governance framework with transparent reporting, robust performance monitoring, and strong accountability across education, health, and care partners. The Board sets the vision and direction for improvement, drives innovation and sustainable change, and focuses on removing barriers, scaling effective practice, and addressing underperformance with urgency. It receives regular, detailed progress reports and uses a comprehensive performance and quality assurance framework, combining data and stakeholder feedback, to maintain a clear line of sight | Independent Chair Chair – SEND Family Voice Torbay Participation Lead (Voice of CYP) Lead Member, Children’s Services Director of Children’s Services LA Directors (Education (SRO), ASC, PH, Corporate, Finance) LA HoS (Commissioning, QA, Best Start in Life) Senior ICB Leads (AD for Women, Children and Young People, Clinical Lead for SEND) Health Trust Leads (Deputy Directors, LD and Autism Lead) | 6-weekly | The Board uses its authority to drive delivery of the Priority Impact Plan and wider SEND activity and will evolve to provide system-level leadership for the Local Area SEND Reform Plan in line with the Schools White Paper. All decisions are: • Evidence-based and data-informed • Recorded and auditable • Aligned to statutory duties and partnership priorities Members hold delegated authority to act on behalf of their organisations, enabling timely, collective decisionmaking. This positions the Board as the primary decision-making forum for the SEND Reform Plan, with authority to set priorities, approve actions, and respond swiftly to risks and issues. Where decisions exceed delegated powers, these are escalated promptly through | Through its multi-agency membership, the SLAIP Partnership Board has clear and direct routes to escalate issues, risks, and decisions into formal partner governance structures where additional authority, scrutiny, or ratification is required. This includes escalation to: Local Authority governance, including the Children’s Continuous Improvement Board and SEND Family Voice Torbay (PCF), ensuring coproduction and lived experience inform escalation and resolution NHS governance arrangements, including the Integrated Care Board and NHS Trust Boards Regional and national oversight, including the Department for Education Regional Director where appropriate Education sector governance, including Further Education providers and representative forums |
42 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
| from strategy to frontline impact. With structured decisionmaking, risk management, and escalation processes, the Board ensures timely, evidence-based action and holds partners to account. It promotes a culture of openness, continuous learning, and shared responsibility, with active involvement of children, young people, and families shaping decisions. The Senior Responsible Owner (SRO) is accountable to the Board for delivery of the SEND Reform Plan, providing overall leadership, coordinating multi-agency work, ensuring alignment with strategic and statutory priorities, and embedding coproduction. The SRO also oversees workstreams to ensure milestones, outcomes, and performance targets are met. | Education (EYs, mainstream, special, AP, Post-16) Chair – Schools Forum Invited Guests: Shadow Lead Member, Children’s Services DfE and NHSE Advisers | appropriate governance routes, including Local Authority and NHS structures. The Board operates with a clear view of the wider system across Torbay, Devon, Plymouth, Cornwall, and the Isles of Scilly, ensuring alignment across partners. This supports clear accountability, rapid decisionmaking, and effective coordination between local and system-level governance. | for early years, special schools, and mainstream schools These established escalation routes ensure that decisions requiring wider system alignment, additional resources, or statutory authority can be progressed swiftly and transparently. This approach provides strong system connectivity, clear accountability, and effective oversight, ensuring that risks and issues are addressed at the appropriate level across the Local Area partnership. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial Governance | Moving forward the following boards will scrutinise spend at an operational level: - SEND Decision to Issue Panel (weekly) tracks and monitors all issue decisions and any decisions on requests for additional funding and placement changes. - Independent Placements and Overview Panel (IPOP) – chaired by the Director of Children’s Services fortnightly discussions on all high spend requests or where multi-agency support is required. |
43 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
From a more strategic level quarterly governance arrangements will be set up so that: - Through termly deep dives, audits and forecasting the education leadership team will consider the risks and issues of any concerning areas of spend. - Schools Forum will have oversight and scrutiny on the quarterly financial return (with the Schools Forum Chair also attending the SLAIP). - The SLAIP will also scrutinise the quarterly financial report by exception, having received escalations from Schools Forum. - The 151 officer, a new member of the SLAIP, will be present to have oversight of financial concerns and these will in turn be escalated to the Local Authority Directors meeting where necessary. Governance Mechanism
Purpose/ Responsibilities Membership
Cadence Decision Rights
Escalation Route SEND Reform Plan SRO
The SRO provides single-point accountability and overall leadership for delivering the Local Area SEND Reform Plan. They ensure the plan is implemented effectively, sustainably, and in line with statutory duties and strategic priorities, including the Schools White Paper. Key responsibilities include:
Divisional Director, Education and SEND – Torbay Council
The SRO is accountable to the board on a 6 -weekly basis Chair of the SEND Reform Plan Delivery Sub-group – 6-weekly meetings
The SRO operates within a clearly defined governance structure, with delegated authority to make decisions necessary for effective delivery of Torbay’s SEND Reform Plan. They are accountable to the SEND Local Area Improvement Partnership Board, where they will report progress, issues and impacts. The SRO has authority to: Make operational and delivery decisions within the scope of the plan and with full transparency and collaboration with partners. Approve implementation approaches, resource use, and delivery plans, including taking corrective action where performance is off track
Where issues cannot be resolved within the SRO’s delegated authority, a formal escalation process applies: Escalation to the SLAIP Board for:
System-wide risks or barriers
Decisions requiring strategic direction, additional resource or policy changes
Risks to statutory compliance or significant performance concerns Further escalation, where required to Director of Children’s Services, LA corporate leaders or lead member, and ICB governance structures for:
Leading and coordinating delivery across education, health, and care partners
Ensuring alignment with partnership objectives and system- wide priorities
Overseeing workstreams to deliver agreed outcomes,
44 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
| milestones, and performance targets • Embedding coproduction so children, young people, and families shape design and delivery • Reporting to and being held accountable by the SLAIP Board for progress and impact | Commission additional analysis or intervention to address emerging issues, ensuring key risks and issues are escalated to the board in a timely manner. Agree changes that do not materially impact overall programme scope, budget or strategic direction | • Workforce performance issues • Financial pressures or workforce constraints • Interdependencies causing system-wide delays • Safeguarding or quality concerns | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Governance | Purpose/ Responsibilities | Membership | Cadence | Decision Rights | Escalation Route | ||||
| Mechanism | |||||||||
| Sub-Groups: 1. Experts at Hand 2. Data and Quality Assurance 3. SEND Reform Plan Delivery | The three sub-groups will operate on behalf of the Board to provide focused operational oversight and drive delivery within its remit. The purpose is to ensure that agreed strategies and plans are translated into effective, timely, and high-quality delivery, resulting in measurable improvements for children, young people, and families. The sub-groups are responsible for monitoring performance and progress against agreed priorities, milestones, and outcomes; coordinating activity across | Data and Quality Assurance • Independent Chair • Divisional Director, Education and SEND (SRO) • Head Of Service – Quality Assurance • Business Intelligence Manager • SEND Commissioning Manager Women’s and Children’s Team NHS Devon ICB • Chair SEND Family Voice Torbay (SFVT) • DfE SEND Advisor | Data & QA and SEND Reform Plan Delivery: 6-weekly EAHO – Initially fortnightly – moving to monthly once established | Each of the sub-groups has delegated authority to make operational, performance and quality-related decisions within its remit on behalf of the SLAIP Board. Specifically, it can: • Agree and direct corrective actions where performance or quality is not at the required standard • Take action to address underperformance, including strengthening delivery plans and reallocating focus or effort • Resolve risks and issues within its scope, including removing barriers to progress | Each sub-group escalates issues and decisions to the SLAIP Board, which holds overall strategic accountability for the SEND Reform Plan. Escalation is used where: • Issues cannot be resolved within the Sub- Group’s delegated authority • Risks have system-wide implications or threaten delivery, statutory compliance, or outcomes • Decisions require strategic direction, additional resources, or formal approval |
45 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
Agree
Commission or request further analysis, audit or deep dives to inform improvement
Identify and share best practice and agree how this is scaled across the partnership
Shape and refine quality assurance activity to ensure it is robust and impactful
Agree messaging and feedback to parents and carers on progress and impact
Agree operational delivery actions and sequencing within the scope of the approved reform plan
Adjust implementation approaches (e.g. timelines, methods, task allocation) to support delivery
Request information, updates, and corrective actions from lead partners
Delivery is significantly off track against agreed milestones or outcomes
Additional resources, policy decisions, or system-wide changes are required
There are conflicts or lack of alignment between partners affecting delivery
There is a risk to statutory compliance, inspection outcomes, or children’s experiences
A change to the scope or direction of the Reform Plan is needed Through the SLAIP Board’s multi-agency membership, further escalation can then be progressed into wider Local Authority, NHS, education and regional governance structures as required.
Deputy Director (interim) for Children and Family Health Devon
Principal Educational Psychologist
Public Health Specialist
IRO – Child in Need
Head of SEND
SEND programme manager Experts at Hand - New
Co-Chair – ICB / LA / PCF
Principle Educational Psychologist
Head of SEND
Divisional Director, Education and SEND (Sro)
Speech & Language Therapy (SaLT) lead
OT lead
Early Years lead
Post 16 lead Further Membership
partners to ensure alignment and reduce duplication; and identifying and addressing risks, barriers, and dependencies. They will apply robust challenge and support to drive continuous improvement and hold partners to account for delivery. Using a combination of performance data, quality assurance activity, and stakeholder feedback, each group will develop a clear, evidence-based understanding of impact and areas for improvement. They will maintain oversight of resources and capacity, ensuring lived experience informs delivery, and adapts plans as needed to strengthen outcomes. Each sub-group will be required to provide regular assurance to the Board through concise reporting on progress, risks, issues, and impact, escalating where
Where decisions have strategic, financial, or system- wide implications beyond its delegated authority, the Sub-
46 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
| necessary to support timely, informed decision-making. | TBC SEND Reform Plan Delivery – NEW • SRO – Chair • Building Block Workstream Leads • Chair – SEND Family Voice Torbay (PCF) • SEND Programme manager Further Membership TBC | Group will escalate these to the SLAIP Board for consideration and formal approval. | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Locality Model Governance | During June 2025 to January 2026 29 out of 31 primary schools piloted a ‘locality’ model approach to SEND, focusing on SLCN, they worked in small clusters to support training, capital developments and worked with the new speech therapist model. This pilot was designed to test how schools could work more collaboratively around a shared challenge. Now primary schools are organising themselves around smaller geographical clusters to further explore how this structure could work more formally. It is anticipated that each cluster of schools will report through to a Locality sub-board and eventually mature into a system where expertise and resources can be shared and administered through each cluster. Through the RISE programme some Secondary schools are also exploring place-based approaches and further discussions are being held to understand how they can similarly join this governance approach. | ||||||||
| Governance | Purpose/ Responsibilities | Membership | Cadence | Decision Rights | Escalation Route | ||||
| Mechanism | |||||||||
| Communication and Engagement Monitoring and Oversight Group | The SEND Communication and Engagement Monitoring and Oversight Group assures the Board that communication with children, young people, families, and partners is effective, inclusive, and influencing service improvement. It ensures stakeholder voices shape SEND reform and that system | Co-Chair: PCF Chair and Communications Lead Members tbc | Bi-monthly | The Communication and Engagement Monitoring and Oversight Group is a nondecision-making body. Its authority is limited to: • Reviewing and scrutinising communication and engagement activity • Providing independent assurance and professional challenge | The Group plays a key role in ensuring communication and engagement risks or failures are visible and acted upon. The group escalates issues to the SLAIP Board. Escalation is used where: • There is evidence that stakeholder voices are not influencing decisions or delivery |
47 Final Torbay SEND Reform Plan
Making recommendations for improvement to relevant groups and the SLAIP Board
Highlighting where stronger or different engagement approaches are required
Communication is unclear, inconsistent, inaccessible, or ineffective at scale
There are significant concerns from families, children, or partners that remain unresolved
Engagement is tokenistic or not meeting co- production expectations
There are gaps in inclusion, particularly for marginalised or seldom- heard groups
- Reputational or trust risks are identified
- System-wide action or strategic direction is required to improve engagement
Through the SLAIP Board’s multi-agency membership, further escalation can then be progressed into wider Local Authority, NHS, education and regional governance structures as required. Appendix 12: Q14 Governance structure shows the relationship between each of these and other boards and groups.
communication is clear, timely, and accessible. Key responsibilities:
Monitor effectiveness, reach, and accessibility of communication
Assess the impact of engagement and participation
Embed co-production across workstreams
Review feedback, complaints, and lived experience to identify improvements
Challenge where engagement is insufficient or not influencing decisions
Identify gaps, especially for underrepresented groups
Promote consistent good practice across partners
Provide assurance that stakeholder voice informs policy, design, and delivery