Wigan Local SEND Reform Plan 2026
Wigan SEND Reform Plan Name of Local Authority: Wigan Council Name of Integrated Care Board: Greater Manchester Icb Local SEND Reform Plan Sro: Cath Pealing – Director of Education and Inclusion Signatories:
| Role | Name | Signature | Email contact | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wigan Council Chief Executive | Alison McKenzie Folan | A.Mckenzie-Folan@wigan.gov.uk | 19 June 2026 | |
| Integrated Care Board (ICB) Chief Executive | Colin Scales | colin.scales1@nhs.net | 19 June 2026 | |
| Wigan Council Director of Children’s Service | Colette Dutton | Colette.Dutton@wigan.gov.uk | 18 June 2026 | |
| Integrated Care Board NHS Place Director | Jonathan Kerry | jonathan.kerry@nhs.net | 18 June 2026 | |
| Wigan Council Chief Financial Officer (CFO/Section 151 Officer) | Sarah Johnston | S.Johnston3@wigan.gov.uk | 18 June 2026 |
Executive Summary Wigan’s Inclusion and SEND Plan sets out a clear and ambitious three-year programme to respond to the current pressures in services for children and young people with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Demand has increased rapidly, with 10,935 children and young people identified with SEND in Wigan schools. Education, Health and Care (EHC) Plans have risen by over 40% since 2023. Needs are emerging earlier and increasing in complexity, while inclusion and attendance, particularly in secondary schools, remain key challenges. These pressures are driving spend, variability in outcomes, and reduced confidence among families and partners. Despite our challenges, Wigan has a strong foundation on which to build on. Relationships with schools, settings and Wigan’s Parent Carer Forum are well-established – coproduction arrangements are maturing and insight from partners shapes decision-making at the highest level. There is a strong culture of doing the right thing, supported by value-led leadership, a willingness to learn, and an openness to transform the way we work. There is a clear, shared commitment across partners to inclusion and earlier intervention, grounded in the Council’s and Icb’s Progress with Unity missions:
- Mission 1: Creating fair opportunities for all
- Mission 2: Enabling towns and neighbourhoods to flourish.
To build an inclusive and responsive system, over the next three years, Wigan will:
- Improve outcomes for children and young people with SEND, including better attendance, reduced exclusions, improved attainment and stronger preparation for adulthood. This will include a strengthened boroughwide approach to post-16 pathways, ensuring young people progress into sustained education, training, employment and independent living.
- Improve workforce capacity and capability: A strengthened Inclusion and SEND Workforce Strategy will expand training, supervision and peer learning across education and partner services. Clearer expectations for Ordinarily Available Inclusive Provision will ensure professionals are better equipped to identify and meet need early, aligned with Wigan’s ways of working.
- Strengthen inclusive practice across all settings: Inclusive mainstream provision will be the default. This will be supported by earlier identification, a consistent graduated response and improved inclusion. The Experts at Hand model will provide timely specialist input within mainstream settings, reducing reliance on statutory pathways and specialist placements. Support will be targeted equitably, guided by local intelligence on need and demand.
- Strengthen the confidence of children, families and partners: The plan prioritises stronger communication and more consistent support. Success will be reflected in improved feedback, fewer disputes, and greater confidence among families, schools and stakeholders.
- Stabilise finances and improve value: By shifting investment towards early intervention, local inclusion and workforce development, Wigan aims to stabilise the exponential growth in EHC Plans, reduce reliance on independent placements, and improve children and young people’s outcomes. Progress will be measured through improved inclusion, placement patterns and financial sustainability.
Collectively, these changes will be a core contributor to Wigan’s Progress with Unity ambition to deliver fair opportunities, support thriving neighbourhoods and inclusive, sustainable public services.
Section 1 – Vision and Goals
- What the local area partnership is trying to achieve?
Our vision: Children and young people with SEND in Wigan will achieve positive life outcomes. Their needs will be identified early, met confidently in local inclusive settings, and supported through strong partnership arrangements. By 2029, most of our children and young people with SEND in Wigan will:
- Attend and participate successfully in education, with an increased proportion supported in a mainstream setting close to home
- Feel like they belong, are valued, safe and included in their schools and communities
- Experience improved health, wellbeing and emotional resilience
- Progress into adulthood with skills, independence and sustained participation in education, training, employment or meaningful occupation.
Children and young people with SEND, and their families will experience a system they trust, where decisions are timely, transparent and focused on outcomes that matter. This vision reflects Wigan’s missions under Progress with Unity:
- Creating fair opportunities for all
- Enabling towns and neighbourhoods to flourish.
In Wigan, SEND reform will be central to building inclusive communities where children grow up supported, feel connected and able to thrive. Our Goals: 1. Improve outcomes for children and young people with SEND - Needs will be identified and supported earlier resulting in:
- Improved attendance and narrowing of the gap to peers
- Increased proportion educated in mainstream settings
- Improved attainment at school
- Reduced suspensions and exclusions
- Increased participation and sustained engagement in post-16 education, training and employment.
2. Increase confidence of parents, carers and young people - Families will experience a more responsive and transparent system, evidenced by:
- Improved parental satisfaction and confidence in mainstream provision
- Reduction in complaints, mediation and tribunals
- Improved timeliness of EHC processes
3. Secure financial sustainability and value for money - Services will operate within a sustainable financial framework, resulting in:
- Reduced spend on independent and out of area provision
- Increased investment in mainstream inclusive provision
- Slower growth in EHC Plans
- Stabilisation of the high needs’ deficit trajectory
- Delivering support and service within the Partnership’s financial envelope.
Section 2 – Strategy
- Where the local area partnership expects to be in the next 3 years
Over the next three years, Wigan will build on strong partnership working, high levels of primary inclusion, and well-established education support services to deliver a confident, inclusive and needs led model of support. Children and young people with SEND will have their needs identified at the earliest opportunity and met successfully within mainstream provision where this is appropriate, supporting improved participation, attendance and progression. The changes will expand and strengthen early help and inclusive practice across all settings and providers. Mainstream early years settings, schools and further education colleges will be increasingly confident to respond to a wide range of needs, supported by timely access to specialist expertise and clear expectations of ordinarily available inclusive provision. Families will experience earlier support, stronger relationships with professionals and greater assurance that needs can be met close to home, reducing the need for escalation to EHC pathways and specialist assessment and diagnostic services. This approach reflects Wigan’s commitment to inclusive education as the default and aligns with the national vision set out in the Schools White Paper, reinforcing our ambition to build a SEND system that is trusted, effective and shaped by the strengths of children, families, communities and the workforce. Our strategy will be underpinned by the following building blocks:
Wigan’s SEND & Inclusion Plan
Building block Ambition by 2029 What this looks like in
Key system shifts
practice
Early identification of need is Needs are identified at the embedded High-quality universal and targeted support in mainstream Inclusive mainstream provision is the default response for most earliest opportunity Ordinarily available inclusive Strengthening inclusion across children and young people with provision in all mainstream education settings settings Preparation for adulthood embedded from Year 9 onwards settings Reduced reliance on EHC plans SEND across all phases of education and specialist pathways Children and young people
| Wigan’s SEND & Inclusion Plan | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Building block | Ambition by 2029 | What this looks like in practice | Key system shifts |
| experience belonging and achieve positive outcomes Strong partnerships with families, health and community services | Stronger inclusion at key transition points Successful engagement in education, employment and training post 16 | ||
| System Leadership, Partnership & Coproduction | A fully integrated SEND system with shared accountability across education, health and care partners | Joint-commissioning and decision-making fully embedded Shared accountability for demand, outcomes and resources Families’ lived experience shaping decisions at all levels | Alignment of funding to commissioning and delivery of services Shared data and intelligence informing decision making Clear pathways of support Genuine coproduction embedded Reduced drift into statutory processes |
| Access to Specialist Support and Local Provision | Specialist support is accessible earlier and locally, based on needs, not diagnosis or statutory pathways | Nurseries, schools and colleges confidently meet a wide range of needs Early deployment of specialist expertise to prevent escalation Specialist placements used appropriately and close to home | Earlier intervention from specialist services Needs-led (not diagnosis led) access to help and support Reduced crisis escalation Increased local sufficiency of provision |
| Encouraging Inclusive Culture and Behaviours | SEND is everybody’s business, supported by a confident and skilled workforce | Workforce confidently identifies and meets needs Adaptations made without waiting for diagnosis or EHCP Evidence-informed practice embedded across services Families experience clear | Measurable increase in workforce confidence at SEND Support Implementation of SEND Workforce Strategy Reduction in unnecessary escalation and disputes |
Wigan’s SEND & Inclusion Plan
Building block Ambition by 2029 What this looks like in
Key system shifts
practice
pathways and strong Consistent, needs-led decision relationships making across the system A Fully Fledged Experts at Hand Offer in Wigan Wigan’s Experts at Hand offer will be built on our existing Education Support Services, strengthening and reshaping what already works rather than creating an entirely new system. This includes services currently delivered through both universal and traded offers, notably Educational Psychology, Targeted Education Support Services (Tess), Emtas, Early Years, Attendance Support and Specialist Sensory Education Support, alongside strong alignment with our social care services and health teams including; Family Hubs, Speech and Language Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Mental Health Support Teams and Health Visiting Teams for younger children. The fully fledged Experts at Hand model will bring these services together into a coherent, needs led and evidence informed offer, providing early specialist advice, consultation and coaching to mainstream settings without automatically triggering diagnosis or statutory assessment. Support will focus on what works best to improve outcomes for children and young people, not on historic service boundaries or ways of working. Experts at Hand will operate primarily through a strengthened universal core offer, ensuring all mainstream early years providers, schools, colleges, alternative provision and family hub and family help services can access timely specialist advice. Traded activity will be reviewed and rebalanced, recognising its current importance to council finances, but aligned more closely to system priorities, equity of access and workforce capacity building. Any change to traded arrangements will be phased, evidence led and subject to impact and affordability. Deployment of Experts at Hand will align with Progress with Unity neighbourhood ways of working, in addition to our strategies for Family First Partnership, and Best Start in Life, --up responses in communities where needs are greatest. Experts at Hand will act as a key system enabler: building mainstream confidence, reducing unnecessary escalation, and ensuring specialist expertise is used earlier, more consistently and with greatest impact. Wigan will not rely on historic models of support, but will continuously adapt practice based on evidence, outcomes and the lived experience of our children and families. Bridging the gap Across all four building blocks, Wigan will bridge the gap between its current position and future ambitions through sustained focus on Oaip, Experts at Hand delivery, neighbourhood-based working, and robust outcome tracking. By 2029, the system will demonstrate reduced, unnecessary escalation, improving outcomes for children and young people, stronger parental confidence and a more sustainable use of resources - delivering inclusive education by design rather than exception.
Building Block 1: Strengthening inclusion across education settings
| Local blueprint for the next 3 years | Where we are | Where we will be in the next 3 years |
|---|---|---|
| Building Block 1: Strengthening inclusion across education settings Key enablers for Building Block 1: The successful delivery of Building Block 1 will be underpinned by the following key enablers which together will shift the system towards earlier identification, confident mainstream responses and sustained inclusion, ensuring that specialist and statutory pathways are used appropriately, proportionately and only when necessary. Prevention and Early Identification: Consistent use of intelligence from the ASQ assessment at 2.5 years, alongside a strengthened Early Health Notification process, will enable emerging needs to be identified and addressed promptly and proportionately. This approach will shift services away from reactive escalation and towards prevention, supporting coordinated early intervention and reducing pressure on schools and statutory pathways as children enter education. Evidence-Informed Early Language and Development: Early language development is central to long-term inclusion and educational outcomes. Embedding evidence informed approaches will strengthen the workforce’s ability to support early language acquisition and respond appropriately to behaviour as a form of communication. This will improve the quality of practice, reduce misinterpretation of need and limit escalation associated with unmet communication and developmental challenges, particularly in the early years and early primary phase of education. School Readiness and Transitions: Transitions are a driver of escalation to statutory support. A borough-wide, coherent focus on school readiness and inclusive transition will strengthen continuity for children, families and settings. Shared expectations, effective information flow and timely access to specialist advice will reduce avoidable escalation at key transition points, particularly on entry to school and movement from primary to secondary education. Ordinarily Available Inclusive Provision (OAIP): Ordinarily Available Inclusive Provision will be a foundational enabler of inclusive mainstream education. By clearly defining what children and families can expect without reliance on statutory plans, OAIP will establish a baseline of inclusive practice across settings. This will promote equity and transparency and strengthen confidence that needs can be met early within mainstream provision. Graduated Response and Inclusive Practice: The graduated response provides the mechanism through which inclusive practice will be delivered. Strengthening assess–plan–do–review cycles will enable settings to identify needs early, adapt support over time and make proportionate decisions about escalation. This will ensure | What is working well.. Wigan’s mainstream school system provides a solid foundation for inclusion: Wigan children and young people benefit from high-quality education Under the previous framework, 97% of mainstream schools were judged Good or Outstanding, creating the conditions for consistent inclusive practice and positive outcomes for children and young people with SEND across the borough. Clear expectations for inclusive support through Ordinarily Available Inclusive Provision (OAIP): There is high engagement with Wigan’s Ordinarily Available Inclusive Provision, with schools increasingly using OAIP to guide universal and targeted support without unnecessary escalation. This shared understanding is strengthening confidence in mainstream provision, particularly in the primary phase, and supporting earlier, more proportionate responses to need. Early signs of improvement in exclusionary practice: There are emerging signs of improvement in permanent exclusions for SEND pupils with 29 (EHCP and SEN Support) in autumn 2025 compared to 39 in autumn 2024 driven in reductions in SEN Support numbers. However, suspensions for pupils rose to 931 in autumn 2025 (rate 9.2). Early health notifications have increased significantly: Rising from 142 in 2024 to 280 in 2025, this improvement reflects greater awareness and the introduction of an accessible online form, enabling more timely and consistent identification of needs. Wigan demonstrates strong performance in sustaining participation for 16–17-year-olds with SEN: Rates rose to 88.53% in 2025, exceeding both the North-West and statistical neighbours and showing a significant +3.77 increase from the previous year. This reflects effective local systems and partnership working that are successfully supporting young people with SEN to remain in education, employment, or training. Areas for development… SEND demand and complexity are rising at pace, increasing pressure on mainstream provision: The number of children and young people with EHC Plans has increased rapidly over a short period - from 2,966 in January 2024 to 4,219 by March 2026, representing a 42% increase in just over two years. Alongside this, 7,829 pupils were supported at SEN Support in Wigan school as of January 2026. Overall, there were 10,935 pupils in Wigan schools with identified SEND. Early years pressures are evident before children enter school: Increasing need is visible prior to school entry, with growing numbers of children entering Reception with emerging or complex SEND. Requests for specialist provision at the start of school continue to rise, indicating that needs are often escalating early. Outcomes at the end of the Early Years Foundation Stage remain a concern - in 2025 only 2.2% of children with EHC Plans | Prevention and earlier identification will reduce the escalation of need: By 2029, Wigan will have a mature, integrated early identification system that consistently prevents escalation before school entry and at key transition points. Early identification will be embedded through: • Consistent system-wide use of ASQ at 2.5 to inform early response • Consistent use of screening tools to identify emerging needs • The Early Health Notification process acting as a trusted, multi-agency trigger for coordinated support and response to emerging needs • Proactive use of shared data and professional discussion to prompt timely intervention rather than delay or drift. As a result, fewer children will enter Reception with unmet or unaddressed needs, and early intervention will be the norm across all phases of education rather than the exception. Children will start school ready to learn and transitions will no longer be escalation points: By 2029, Wigan will have coherent borough-wide School Readiness and Transition models embedded across all phases of education. This will include: • An embedded School Readiness Strategy and shared toolkit used consistently by early years settings, schools and families • Strong information flow and professional dialogue, ensuring transitions are planned, inclusive and child/young person-centred • Reliable access to specialist advice at key transition points where needs are emerging. Transitions, particularly into Reception and from primary to secondary, and secondary to college will be points of support and continuity, not triggers for escalation. Support will be ordinarily available in mainstream settings: By 2029, support will be reliably and consistently available in mainstream settings without the need for statutory plans. The OAIP will: • Clearly define what children and families can expect without statutory plans • Be aligned with national inclusion standards and local patterns of need • Be co-produced with schools, MATs, FE providers and the Parent Carer Forum. Practice across settings will be more consistent, reducing variability that currently drives escalation “just in case”. Families and professionals will trust that support is available early and reliably within mainstream provision. |
| Local blueprint for the next 3 years | Where we are | Where we will be in the next 3 years |
|---|---|---|
| most needs are addressed through effective SEND Support and statutory pathways for intervention will be reserved for children whose needs cannot be met within mainstream provision despite sustained and well-evidenced support. Early Access to Specialist Advice – Experts at Hand: Early, access to specialist advice is essential to building mainstream confidence and capability. Experts at Hand will provide timely consultation, coaching and whole-setting development. This will improve decision-making, support earlier intervention and reduce dependency on statutory routes as the primary means of accessing expertise. Equitable access across phases of education will ensure early specialist advice consistently supports inclusion. Inclusive Environments: Inclusive environments are a key enabler, as inclusion is realised through everyday teaching practice, leadership decisions and the deployment of school resources. Supporting schools to prioritise adaptive teaching and to use nurture and inclusion spaces as structured, time-limited supports will ensure additional provision enhances participation rather than driving separation. Reinforcement through OAIP, SEND Reviews and quality assurance activity will reduce reliance on exclusionary responses and strengthens confidence in mainstream provision. Emotional Wellbeing, Attendance and Engagement: Emotional wellbeing is integral to sustained inclusion and participation in education. Integrating mental health, attendance and engagement support within inclusive education practice enables early, preventative responses to emerging difficulties. This will reduce disengagement, support improved attendance and limit progression into exclusionary practice or alternative provision, particularly during secondary education. Partnership with Families and Parental Confidence: Parental confidence is a critical system-level enabler of inclusion. Clear expectations, consistent early support pathways and transparent decision-making will reduce escalation driven by uncertainty or lack of trust. Strong relational practice, supported by SENDIASS, the Parent Carer Forum, the VCSFE and Family Hubs, will ensure families experience support as credible, responsive and inclusive, reinforcing mainstream provision as the default route for meeting children’s needs. | achieved a Good Level of Development, below the national average and reducing year-on-year. Inclusion is not yet as strong in secondary schools as it is in primary: Mainstream inclusion drops significantly as children move into secondary education – 61% of pupils with an EHC Plan attend a mainstream primary school, compared to 44% of secondary pupils. Attendance and engagement challenges are concentrated in secondary settings: Attendance for pupils with EHC Plans in secondary schools fell to 83.2% in Autumn 2025, and both persistent absence and severe absence for SEND pupils increased during the same period. Educational outcomes for older pupils with SEND remain weaker: Outcomes at Key Stages 1 and 2 are strong, outcomes at Key Stage 4 are below national averages for pupils with EHC Plans. In 2025, Attainment 8 for the EHC Plan cohort fell to 11.0 compared to a national figure of 13.9. This reflects lower attendance and sustained engagement in secondary education. Reliance on reduced timetables and exclusionary practices remains too high: The proportion of pupils with EHC Plans on reduced timetables increased to 3.7% in Autumn 2025, with a significant proportion lasting longer than 12 months. Status of key enablers: Early Identification and Prevention – Developing Early identification is increasingly embedded across health, early years and education pathways. The ASQ assessment at 2.5 years is well established within early years health pathways and is supporting earlier recognition of developmental need. This has strengthened the identification of emerging SEND of younger children and provides a solid foundation for prevention and early intervention. The Early Health Notification process has been strengthened through the multi-agency Early Years Forum and is now operating as a clear and trusted route into early support. It enables coordinated, multi-agency responses, particularly for children with more complex needs. There is further opportunity to maximise preventative impact through more proactive response to need prior to school entry. Evidence-Informed Early Language and Development Approaches – Emerging Evidence informed approaches to early language development, including WellComm, are widely implemented across early years settings. These approaches are strengthening early identification of speech, language and communication needs and supporting a clearer understanding of behaviour as a form of communication. While this provides a strong foundation, further work is needed to fully align early language approaches with workforce training, universal provision expectations and targeted intervention | Inclusive teaching and environments will meet a wider range of needs in classrooms: By 2029, inclusive environments in Wigan will be defined by high quality teaching and purposeful deployment of resources, not by separation. Mainstream settings, schools and colleges will: • Use adaptive teaching, reasonable adjustments and high-quality SEN Support to meet most needs within classrooms • Deploy teaching assistants in line with evidence-informed practice to support learning and independence, not create dependency • Use nurture provision, inclusion spaces and additional support bases as flexible, time-limited supports linked to clear reintegration into mainstream learning. This will significantly reduce reliance on segregation, alternative provision and long-term reduced timetables, particularly in secondary schools. Escalation will be reduced by design through confident SEND Support: By 2029, Wigan will have a confident, consistent graduated response to SEND embedded across all education settings. Escalation will be reduced through: • Outcome-focused SEND Support planning used consistently across mainstream settings • Regular review and adaptation through assess–plan–do– review cycles • Clear, shared multi-agency thresholds guiding proportionate decision making • Early access to specialist advice through Experts at Hand, without triggering statutory processes. Requests for EHC needs assessment will be purposeful, proportionate and evidence-based, demonstrating that mainstream support has been fully explored and reviewed. Emotional wellbeing, attendance and engagement will be addressed early and inclusively: By 2029, emotional wellbeing support will be fully integrated with inclusive education practice. This will be achieved through: • Embedded Mental Health Support Teams across early years, schools and colleges • Consistent and effective EBSA pathways, supporting early identification and intervention • Family Hubs providing joined-up early help and relational support for children and families. As a result, attendance, particularly in secondary schools, will improve, and exclusionary practice will continue to reduce. Families will trust mainstream provision and early support pathways: |
| Local blueprint for the next 3 years | Where we are | Where we will be in the next 3 years |
|---|---|---|
| pathways, and to use outcome data more consistently to refine and evidence impact over time. School Readiness and Transitions - Not yet emerged Transitions remain a significant pressure point for escalation in Wigan. Although there is strong recognition of the importance of school readiness, a coherent, borough-wide Strategy is not yet in place. Existing early years support, transition activity and Early Years Additional Resource funding provide promising foundations, but they are not yet aligned with the preventative offer. Ordinarily Available Inclusive Provision (OAIP) – Developing OAIP is firmly established across the borough in most mainstream schools and increasingly provides clarity about what should be delivered without escalation to statutory processes. Engagement is particularly strong in the primary phase, offering a solid platform for prevention. Further development is required to: • Refresh and strengthen the guidance in line with national inclusion standards • Embed consistent application across secondary and post-16 settings • Increase impact on early intervention so that emerging needs are met confidently through mainstream provision. Graduated Response – Developing The graduated response (assess, plan, do, review) is clearly articulated as a concept across settings and schools, but requires further improvements to ensure outcome-focused SEND Support planning, review and adaptation prior to escalation decisions being made. Early Access to Specialist Advice (Experts at Hand) – Developing Education Support Services (EPS, TESS, EMTAS, SSET, EY) are increasingly recognised as a trusted mechanism for early, non-statutory specialist advice. They provide access to specialist input and support workforce confidence, particularly around problem-solving for children with SEND. Work will be required to expand reach, develop and embed the offer with SLT and OT, clarify access routes and response expectations, and ensure equitable use across early years, schools and post-16 settings so that early specialist advice consistently prevents unnecessary escalation. Inclusive Environments – Emerging Schools are increasingly developing inclusive environments through adaptive teaching, nurture approaches and the use of additional spaces to support regulation and engagement. However, the pedagogical use of these spaces and resources, to support | By 2029, parental confidence in mainstream provision will be significantly stronger. Families will experience: • Clear expectations about what support is available through OAIP • Consistent early support pathways that reduce the need to escalate • Transparent, shared decision making and problem solving. SENDIASS, the Parent Carer Forum, the VCSFE and Family Hubs will be embedded partners in shaping provision, supporting resolution and reinforcing trust in inclusive mainstream education. The impact we expect to see by 2029 1. Children’s developmental needs will be identified and supported before school entry 2. More children having needs identified and met early and successfully in mainstream settings 3. Reduced reliance on EHC Plans, alternative provision and specialist placements 4. Stronger inclusion, attendance and outcomes at secondary phase 5. Reduced use of long-term reduced timetables 6. More trusting, confident relationships with families. |
classroom inclusion rather than separation, is still emerging. Alignment with Oaip expectations, the effective use of teaching supports (including teaching assistants), and clear reintegration pathways mainstream classrooms will strengthen participation in mainstream learning. Emotional Wellbeing, Attendance and Engagement – Developing There is a strong system-wide commitment to promoting emotional wellbeing and inclusion. Mental Health Support Teams are established across a growing number of schools and colleges and are supporting access to timely intervention. Ebsa pathways are clearly defined and supported by educational psychology. Progress is evident through the Engagement Centres in reducing exclusionary practice. However, attendance, particularly at secondary phase, remains a challenge. Further development will focus on strengthening preventative approaches, improving integration between services and sustaining impact over time. Partnership with Families and Parental Confidence – Emerging Parental confidence in mainstream provision is beginning to strengthen as inclusive practice becomes clearer and more consistent through Oaip and improved early support pathways. Sendiass, the Parent Carer Forum and Family Hubs are playing an increasingly important role in building trust, improving communication and supporting early resolution. Parental confidence is expected to continue to grow as mainstream inclusive practice improves and reliance on reactive statutory intervention reduces. Maturity Matrix Assessment (March 2026):
- Pillar 4: High Quality Service Delivery – Developing
| Success measures | Baseline | Target Metrics |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Children’s developmental needs will be identified and supported before school entry, reducing escalation into statutory pathways at Reception and beyond. | 1. Percentage of 2-year-old children benefiting from funded early education - 69.8% (2025) | 1. By 2029, the proportion of 2-year-olds benefiting from early education will grow 28.9%. |
| 2. Number of Early Health Notifications received – 279 (Calendar Year 2025) | 2. By 2029, the number of Early Health Notifications received will increase by 46% and shift towards earlier, higher-quality identification. | |
| 3. Number of EHCNA requests by CYP age (under 5 years) - 249 (2025 Calendar Year) | 3. By 2029, there will be a 15% reduction in EHCNA requests for children under-5 from the forecast of 286 to 243. | |
| 4. Number of CYP with EHCPs (under 5 years) - 155 (May 2026) | 4. By 2029, there will be a stable under 5 cohort of EHC Plans of 193. | |
| 5. Requests for specialist provision at Reception have risen year on year from 58 in 2022 to 158 in 2025. | 5. By 2029, requests for specialist places in Reception will reduce to around 104 (10% annual reduction ). |
| Success measures | Baseline | Target Metrics |
|---|---|---|
| 6. Proportion of children meeting their developmental milestones as assessed by ASQ at 2.5 years - 78% (2024/25) | 6. By 2029, 84.4% of children will meet their development milestones assessed through the ASQ at 2.5 years | |
| 7. Proportion of children with an EHC Plan achieving a Good Level of Development (GLD) in the Early Years Foundation Stage Profile – 2.2% (2025). | 7. By 2029, the proportion of children with EHC Plans achieving a GLD, will increase gradually to 4.5% in 2029. | |
| 2. More children and young people with SEND will have their needs met early and consistently in mainstream provision, reducing reliance on EHC plans, alternative and specialist provision. | 8. Pupils with EHC Plans in mainstream primary - 63.1% (March 2026) | 8. By 2029, more than 65% of pupils with EHC Plans will attend a mainstream primary school. |
| 9. Pupils with EHC Plans in mainstream secondary - 44% (March 2026) | 9. By 2029, more than 50% EHCP pupils will attend a mainstream secondary school | |
| 10. Number of children with EHC Plans in specialist provision - 1,444 (May 2026) | 10. By 2029, the number of children with EHC Plans in specialist provision will stabilise to 1,485. | |
| 11. Number of children with EHC Plans in Alternative Provision - 38 (May 2026) | 11. By 2029 the number of children with EHC Plans will stabilise to 96. | |
| 12. Proportion of pupils with SEND (without an EHC Plan) in mainstream schools – 16.1% (School Census 2026) | 12. By 2029, the proportion of pupils with SEND (without an EHC Plan) in mainstream schools will increase to 17.5%. | |
| 13. Proportion of pupils with EHC Plans in mainstream schools – 6.4% (School Census 2026) | 13. By 2029, the proportion of pupils with an EHC Plans in mainstream schools will stabilise at 6.2%. | |
| 3. Stronger inclusion, attendance and outcomes at secondary phase | 14. Secondary attendance rate for SEND pupils (EHCP and SEN Support) - 85.9 (2024/25 Academic Year - Nexus) | 14. 14. By 2029, secondary attendance for SEND pupils will increase to over 89 - an increase of 1.5 percentage points. |
| 15. Secondary severe absence rate for SEND pupils (EHCP and SEN Support) – 9.7 (2024/25 Academic Year - Nexus) | 15. 15. By 2029, severe absence will reduce for SEND pupils by 15.5% to a rate of around 8.2. | |
| 16. Suspension rates for SEND pupils (EHCP and SEN Support) – 21.2 (2024/25 Academic Year - Nexus) | 16. By 2029, the suspension rate for SEND pupils will reduce by 18.4% to 17.3. | |
| 17. Permanent exclusion rate for SEND pupils (EHCP and SEN Support) – 0.6 (2024/25 Academic Year - Nexus) | 17. By 2029, the permanent exclusion rate for SEND pupils will reduce to 0.5. | |
| 4. Reduced use of long-term reduced timetables | 18. Number of children with SEND on reduced timetables – 224 (Autumn Term 2025). | 18. By 2029, the number of children with SEND on reduced timetables will reduce by 26% to 165. |
| 19. Proportion of children with Wigan managed EHC Plans (R to Year 11) on a reduced timetable - 3.7% (Autumn Term 2025) | 19. By 2029, the proportion of children with Wigan managed EHC Plans (R to Year 11) on a reduced timetable will reduce to 1.2 percentage points to 2.5% (32.4% percentage decrease). | |
| 20. Number of children on reduced timetable for more than six months – 128 (2024/25 Academic Year), | 20. By 2029, the number of children on a reduced timetable for more than six months will reduce by 53.3% to 70 children. | |
| 5. More trusting, confident relationships with families | 21. Number of SEND tribunal appeals - 136 (2025 Calendar Year). | 21. By 2029, there will be 30% reduction in the forecast tribunal appeals from 329 to 230 in 2029. |
| 22. Number of CYP with EHCPs in EHE - 76 (May 2026). | 22. By 2029, the number of CYP with EHCPs Electively Home Educated will reduce by 10% to 55. |
Building Block 2: System leadership, local partnership collaboration and co-production
| Local blueprint for the next 3 years | Where we are | Where we will be in the next 3 years |
|---|---|---|
| Building Block 2: System leadership, local partnership collaboration and co-production Wigan’s ambition over the next three years: Wigan will operate a single, joined-up SEND system where education, health and care leaders share responsibility for demand, decision making and outcomes. Planning and provision will be shaped by robust local intelligence and the lived experience of children, young people and families. Parents, carers and young people will be equal partners in designing, delivering and evaluating SEND services, resulting in consistent, transparent and accountable practice across the system. Over the next three years, system leadership will mature from coordination to collective ownership, with clear accountability, shared data and trusted relationships driving earlier intervention, better experiences and improved outcomes for children and young people with SEND. Key enablers for Building Block 2: The successful delivery of Building Block 2 will be underpinned by the following key enablers which together will strengthen system leadership, shared accountability and partnership working across education, health and care. These enablers will support more coherent decision-making, reduce fragmentation and ensure that children, young people and families experience the SEND support as joined-up, transparent and responsive. Strong SEND Partnership Governance and Accountability: Robust, collective governance arrangements across education, health and care are essential to sustaining improvement. Clear roles, shared accountability and effective oversight will ensure partners jointly own demand, decisions and outcomes. This will strengthen confidence at both place and system level, enabling timely decision-making and consistent application of agreed thresholds and priorities. Joint Education, Health and Care Demand and Decision-Making: Joint management of demand, risk and resources will ensure that education, health and care partners take shared responsibility for pressure across the system. Aligned thresholds, coordinated planning and collective problem-solving will reduce delay, instability and avoidable escalation, supporting proportionate and timely responses for children and families. Data-Led Decision-Making – “One Source of Truth”: A shared, trusted SEND dataset will provide consistent evidence base for planning, performance management, sufficiency and investment decisions. Using a single version of the truth will reduce duplication, | What is working well… Greater placement stability for children and young people with EHC Plans: Despite rising levels of complexity and demand, placement stability for pupils with EHCPs has improved. Unplanned school-to-school moves (excluding planned transitions, EHE and transfers to special schools) reduced from 15 in 2023/24 to 8 in 2024/25, and the number of school moves triggered by suspension has continued to fall, reducing to 7 in Autumn 2025. This indicates more effective early problem-solving, improved collaboration with schools, and stronger use of graduated responses to prevent placement breakdown. Children remain educated locally, close to family and communities: Over 92% of the EHCP cohort continues to be educated within Wigan, a consistently strong position over recent years. This reflects effective joint planning, confidence in local provision and reduced reliance on distant placements, supporting continuity of education and family life even as the EHC Plan cohort has grown to over 4,200 children and young people. More children with EHCPs remaining in mainstream provision: The number of pupils with EHC Plans educated in mainstream schools has continued to rise (from 1,489 to 1,668 over two years), alongside high proportions of pupils being taught fully in mainstream settings. This demonstrates growing confidence in inclusive practice and the impact of ordinarily available provision and specialist outreach. Strong front-end decision-making despite rising demand: Demand for EHC needs assessments remains high (1,051 requests in 2025), yet the system continues to perform strongly at the front door, with 96.4% of decisions to assess made within six weeks. This provides families with early clarity, reduces uncertainty and supports earlier intervention, even as overall assessment volumes and complexity increase. Growing use of pre-statutory and early support: There is clear evidence of a shift towards earlier, non-statutory support. In 2025, 414 children were supported by Educational Psychology without an EHCP, and 156 children accessed Early Years Additional Resource, reflecting investment in early identification, workforce advice and preventative support upstream of statutory processes. Health pathways contributing to stability: CAMHS performance remains a system strength, with most children seen within six weeks and all within 18 weeks. This supports emotional wellbeing, stabilises placements and helps prevent escalation into crisis-driven educational disruption. Lived experience actively shaping improvement: Feedback from parents, carers and young people, gathered through surveys, the Parent Carer Forum, Local Offer engagement and participation activity, has directly influenced pathway redesign, Local Offer improvements and Family Hub delivery. While pressures remain, there is evidence of a system that listens and adapts, supporting ongoing trust. | System leadership will operate as collective ownership, not coordination Over the next three years, Wigan will move to a system that demonstrates full collective ownership of demand, decisions and outcomes across education, health and care. In practice this means: • Strategic and operational decisions will be owned jointly, with clearer accountability for managing pressure and risk across the whole system • Escalation will reduce as partners intervene earlier together, rather than responding individually when pressure peaks • Governance arrangements will focus less on assurance and more on active problem-solving, prioritisation and delivery of improvement. Children and families will experience a system that acts early, consistently and transparently, rather than one that feels fragmented or reactive. Demand will be managed earlier, jointly and more confidently By 2029, Wigan will increasingly manage SEND demand through earlier, needs-led and collaborative decision-making, rather than through statutory escalation by default. Over the next three years: • Education, health and care partners will use common thresholds, shared risk assessment and joint panels to manage pressure • Schools will be supported to resolve challenges earlier through joint problem-solving, rather than relying on EHC needs assessment as the primary route to support • Rising EHCP demand will be slowed by stronger prevention, earlier intervention and more confident use of graduated support. This will reduce system strain, shorten timescales and improve experiences for children and families. Children will be supported to remain in school wherever possible Building on improving placement stability, the system will work to reduce exits from education altogether, particularly into other arrangements. In practice this means: • EBSA, attendance and emotional wellbeing needs will be addressed earlier through joint education, family help and health responses • Schools will have clearer routes to support when needs escalate, reducing breakdowns and unplanned exits |
| Local blueprint for the next 3 years | Where we are | Where we will be in the next 3 years |
|---|---|---|
| improve transparency and enable partners to respond proactively to emerging trends, rather than reacting to crisis points. Proactive and Relationship-Based Communication with Children, Young People and Families: Clear, consistent and strengths-based communication is central to building trust and confidence in the SEND system. Proactive engagement with children, young people and families will reduce uncertainty, support early resolution of concerns and help families navigate services with greater clarity and confidence, limiting escalation driven by frustration or lack of information. Coproduction as Core Practice: A jointly owned Coproduction Charter will embed meaningful participation by parent carers and young people across strategy development, service design, delivery and evaluation. Coproduction will move beyond consultation to shared ownership, ensuring that services are shaped by lived experience and remain responsive to what matters most to families. The Voice of the Child and Family Visible in Decision-Making: Decision-making across the SEND system will consistently reflect the voice of the child and family. Evidence from lived experience, alongside professional assessment, will inform planning and decision-making, ensuring responses are person-centred, transparent and grounded in what will make the greatest difference to outcomes and wellbeing. A Shared Outcomes Framework: A small, clearly defined set of shared outcomes will align education, health and care partners around common goals. This outcomes framework will focus the system on improving experience, inclusion and long-term life chances, providing a common reference point for evaluating progress and impact across agencies. Workforce Confidence in System Leadership and Collaboration: Confident system leadership and collaboration are essential to sustaining reform. Leaders and practitioners will be supported to work across organisational boundaries with shared language, clarity of roles and collective problem-solving. This will strengthen professional trust, reduce duplication and enable more joined-up support for children and young people. | System pressures are visible, owned and managed: Leaders share a clear understanding of system pressures, particularly around assessment backlogs (162 assessments over 20 weeks and 196 outstanding EHCP amendments as of March 2026). Recovery actions, additional capacity and reprioritisation are in place, demonstrating proactive management and collective accountability across education, health and care rather than reactive crisis response. Areas for development… Increasing numbers of children educated outside of school remain a key concern: While placement stability within schools has improved, the data shows a continued rise in children educated outside of mainstream settings. The number of children with EHCPs who are ‘Electively Home Educated’ and in ‘Educated Otherwise Than at School’ (EOTAS) or other local authority arrangements have increased. This highlights that, although schools are increasingly effective at stabilising placements once children are on roll, further work is required to address the factors leading families to exit the school system. End-to-end EHC timeliness continues to impact lived experience: Despite strong front-end performance, with 96.4% of decisions to assess made within six weeks, overall compliance with the 20-week timescale remains low. Only 21.2% of EHC Plans were issued within 20 weeks in 2025, and the system continues to carry a significant backlog, with 162 active assessments over 20 weeks and 196 outstanding plan amendments following annual reviews as of March 2026. Educational Psychology and specialist capacity continue to constrain system flow: Demand for EHC assessments and advice has increased year on year, placing sustained pressure on Educational Psychology, health advice and multi-agency decision-making and contributing to assessment delays. Rising statutory demand continues to test demand management: EHC needs assessment requests remain high (1,051 requests in 2025) with a high proportion received from parents which indicates the need to further strengthen early intervention, SEN Support and confidence in non-statutory pathways to prevent avoidable escalation into the EHC pathway. The child and family voice is not yet consistently visible in operational decisions: Coproduction is a clear strategic strength in Wigan; however, qualitative insight indicates that the voice of the child and family is not yet consistently or visibly influencing operational decision-making, particularly within panels and case-level processes. Variable confidence across schools in meeting emerging and complex need: Trends in EHE, reduced timetables and alternative provision usage indicate that confidence and capability remain variable across schools, particularly at secondary phase. Growing complexity, attendance pressures and behavioural need continue to challenge some settings, underscoring the need for further | • The system will act more decisively when children are at risk of leaving school, rather than responding after placement loss has occurred. Over time, more children and young people will experience stable, inclusive education close to home, with fewer disrupted pathways. Lived experience will routinely shape operational decisions Coproduction is already a strategic strength; over the next three years this will become fully visible and embedded in day-to-day decision-making. In practice: • Decision-making panels will consistently evidence the voice of the child and family, alongside professional assessment • Families will be able to see how their lived experience has influenced outcomes, increasing transparency and trust • Children and young people will increasingly understand and influence the decisions being made about their education and support. This will reduce conflict, complaints and disengagement, and strengthen confidence in the system. Data will be used to drive action Wigan will operate with a single, trusted understanding of the SEND system, using data to anticipate pressure and guide investment, rather than respond after crisis. This means: • Shared data will inform sufficiency, workforce planning and commissioning decisions across partners • Leaders will track outcomes that matter to children and families (stability, inclusion, reintegration), not just activity and throughput • Performance discussions will focus on impact and learning, not compliance alone. Over time, this will strengthen accountability and enable smarter, earlier decisions. Relationships with families will become proactive and preventative Communication with families will shift from largely reactive to proactive, relationship-based and strengths-focused. In practice: • Families will receive earlier, clearer communication about support options and decision-making • Escalation caused by uncertainty, mistrust or lack of information will reduce |
| Local blueprint for the next 3 years | Where we are | Where we will be in the next 3 years |
|---|---|---|
| workforce development, specialist support and clearer inclusive pathways to sustain children in education. Status of our key enablers: Strong SEND Partnership governance and accountability arrangements – Maturing Wigan has well-established SEND governance with stable, knowledgeable leadership and clear strategic oversight through the SEND & AP Partnership Board and sub-groups. Shared ambition, defined structures and increasing grip on performance, risk and improvement activity demonstrate a mature approach, despite recent disruption linked to Greater Manchester ICB structural changes. Joint education, health and care demand and decision-making – Developing Joint panels, commissioning arrangements and Multi-Agency Resource Panels support shared decision-making and risk management. However, opportunities to pool budgets and consistently translate joint intent into proactive demand management remain under-developed, limiting the system’s ability to mitigate escalation at pace. Data-led decision-making (“one source of truth”) – Developing The partnership demonstrates a strong and improving understanding of SEND needs and pressures, underpinned by routine use of performance data, JSNA intelligence and lived experience. Work is progressing to strengthen a shared “one source of truth”, though data integration across education, health and care is not yet fully realised. Proactive and relationship-based communication with children, young people and families – Developing Communication channels with families are established and supported by strong coproduction arrangements but remain largely reactive. Further development is required to ensure communication is consistently proactive, relationship-based and reaches seldom-heard groups. Coproduction Charter – Maturing Coproduction is a clear strength in Wigan, with a refreshed Coproduction Charter, strong Parent Carer Forum partnership and influential children and young people’s participation structures. Lived experience routinely informs strategic direction, service design and improvement activity rather than operating as a discrete engagement task. The voice of the child and family visible in decision-making panels – Developing While lived experience strongly shapes strategic planning, its direct and consistent visibility within operational decision-making panels is not yet fully embedded. Strengthening how children’s and families’ voices influence decisions and outcomes remain a shared development priority. Shared outcomes framework – Developing | • Seldom-heard families will be reached more consistently, strengthening equity and inclusion. Families will feel more confident navigating SEND pathways and more supported before issues reach crisis point. The workforce will lead across organisational boundaries Leaders and practitioners will increasingly operate as one SEND workforce, rather than separate services. Over the next three years: • Shared language, expectations and ways of working will be embedded • Cross-system leadership will be normalised at strategic and operational levels • Schools, services and partners will feel confident resolving challenges together, rather than passing responsibility on. This will underpin sustainability and resilience across the SEND system. The impact we expect to see By 2029. Wigan expects to see: 1. Earlier, joint intervention preventing escalation into statutory processes 2. Faster, more consistent EHC pathways where statutory plans are needed 3. Reduced exits to other arrangements through stronger in-school support 4. Greater placement stability and fewer breakdowns 5. Stronger trust from children, young people and families. |
Outcomes are increasingly referenced across strategic documents and performance discussions; however, there is not yet a concise, system-wide set of jointly owned outcomes consistently driving collective accountability, monitoring and improvement. Workforce confidence in system leadership and collaboration – Developing There is strong workforce commitment to partnership working, supported by embedded supervision, SEND workforce development planning and stable leadership. Confidence is growing, though role clarity, shared language and consistent cross-system collaboration require further strengthening to achieve full maturity. Maturity assessment (March 2026):
- Pillar 1: Coproduction with families – Maturing
- Pillar 2: System Leadership & Governance – Maturing
- Pillar 3: Accurate understanding of needs and experiences - Developing
| Success measures | Baseline | Target Metrics |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Earlier, joint intervention preventing escalation into statutory processes | 1. EHC referral for a needs assessment (all ages) - 1,051 (Calendar Year 2025). | 1. By 2029, the number of EHC referral for a needs assessment (all ages) will reduce from the forecast position of 1,185 to 1,141. |
| 2. The number of EHC needs assessments completed – 744 (Calendar Year 2025). | 2. By 2029, the number of EHC needs assessment completed in year will increase because through-put from referrals to assessment will be timelier and referrals for the EHCNA pathway will be more appropriate – 964. | |
| 3. The number of EHCNA that result in an EHC Plan - 721 (Calendar Year 2025). | 3. By 2029, the number of EHCNA that result in an EHC Plan will remain broadly stable – 939. | |
| 4. Number of children supported through Early Years Additional Resource – 76 (September 2025). | 4. By 2029, the number of children supported through Early Years Additional Resource will increase 9% – 83. | |
| 2. Faster, more consistent EHC pathways where statutory plans are needed | 5. Percentage of decisions to assess within 6 weeks - 96.4% (Calendar Year 2025) | 5. By 2029, most of the decisions to assess will be completed within 6 weeks and current performance will improve by 7% – 98.5%. |
| 6. Percentage of initial request for assessment that were refused - 27.5% (Calendar Year 2025) | 6. By 2029, the percentage of initial request for assessment that are refused will stabilise at around 25.0%, | |
| 7. Number of active EHC assessments over 20 weeks - 162 (March 2026) | 7. By 2029, the number of active EHC assessments over 20 weeks will reduce to less than 10. | |
| 8. The percentage of EHC Plans issued within 20 weeks (including exceptions) – 21.2% (Calendar Year 2025) | 8. By 2029, three quarters of EHC Plans will be issued within 20 weeks (including exceptions) – 75%. | |
| 9. The percentage of EHC Plans issued within 20 weeks (excluding exceptions) – 22.7% (Calendar Year 2025) | 9. By 2029, the proportion of EHC Plans will be issued within 20 weeks (including exceptions) will increase to more than 85%. | |
| 10. Number of outstanding EHC Plan amendments following an Annual Review – 196 (March 2026) | 10. By 2029, the number of outstanding EHC Plan amendments following an Annual Review will reduce by 80% to less than 20. | |
| 3. Reduced exits to other arrangements through stronger in-school support | 11. Number of all CYP with SEN in local area not in education - 152 | 11. By 2029, the number of all CYP with SEN forecast not to be in education will reduce 15% - 96. |
| Success measures | Baseline | Target Metrics |
|---|---|---|
| 12. Number of children with EHC Plans in EOTAS / other LA arrangements - 54 (January 2026) | 12. By 2029, the number of children with EHC Plans forecast to be in EOTAS / other LA arrangements will 15% - 74. | |
| 13. Number of CYP with SEND in Elective Home Education – 76 (May 2026) | 13. By 2029, the number of CYP with SEND forecast to be in Elective Home Education will reduce 28% - 55. | |
| 4. Greater placement stability and fewer breakdowns | 14. The number of children moving school following a suspension (EHC Plan and SEND pupils) - 14 (2024/25 Academic Year) | 14. By 2029, the number of children moving school following a suspension (EHC Plan and SEND pupils) will reduce 50% to 7 or less. |
| 15. Number of schools moves for pupils with an EHC Plan (excluding planned moves such as house moves) - 8 (Autumn Term 2025) | 15. By 2029, the number of school moves for pupils with an EHC Plan (excluding planned moves such as house moves) will remain stable at 5. | |
| 5. Stronger trust from children, young people and families | 16. Number of visitors to the local offer - 26,346 (2025 Calendar Year) | 16. By 2029, the number of visits to the local offer will increase by 25% to more than 33,000. |
| 17. Number of mediations logged in the calendar year – 133 (2025) | 17. By 2029, the number of mediations logged in the calendar year will reduce 47% to no more than 70. | |
| 18. Proportion of mediation decisions conceded in the calendar year – 41% (2025) | 18. By 2029, the proportion of mediation decisions conceded in the calendar year will reduce 39% to 25%. |
Building Block 3: Access to specialist support and local placements
| Local blueprint for the next 3 years | Where we are | Where we will be in the next 3 years |
|---|---|---|
| Building Block 3: Access to specialist support and local placements Wigan’s ambition over the next three years: Specialist support will be available locally and at the earliest point of need. Schools and settings will be confident and well-supported to meet a wide range of needs inclusively, with specialist expertise deployed early to prevent crisis. Children and young people will be supported based on need, not diagnosis, and specialist placements will be used appropriately for those with the most complex and severe needs, close to home wherever possible. Key enablers for Building Block 3: The successful delivery of Building Block 3 will be underpinned by the following key enablers, which together will strengthen Wigan’s specialist and alternative provision offer while maintaining inclusion as the default. These enablers will ensure that specialist support is used purposefully and proportionately, local capacity is grown sustainably, and escalation into specialist or alternative pathways is time limited, needs led and outcomes focused. A Balanced System Approach to Speech, Language and Communication: Speech, language and communication are foundational to inclusion and long-term outcomes. A clear, whole system framework will ensure that children and young people receive the right level of support at the right time, spanning universal communication rich environments, targeted interventions and specialist speech and language therapy. This balanced approach will strengthen early identification and intervention, enable proportionate responses to need and reduce over reliance on specialist pathways and statutory escalation where needs can be met earlier and more effectively. Early and Embedded Specialist Expertise – Experts at Hand: Access to timely, multi-disciplinary specialist advice is critical to sustaining inclusive practice. The Experts at Hand model will ensure that advice, coaching and consultation are readily available to schools and settings, building workforce confidence and capability to meet a wide range of SEND. By embedding specialist input earlier within mainstream practice, this approach will support better decision making, strengthen early intervention and reduce unnecessary escalation into specialist placement. Special School Expertise and Outreach: Special schools are a vital source of specialist knowledge and practice. A structured outreach, coaching and joint working model will enable this expertise to be shared more systematically with mainstream settings. This will support schools to meet increasingly complex | What is working well… • Specialist education support offer: Wigan benefits from a well-established range of specialist services supporting early and targeted intervention, including Educational Psychology (EPS), Targeted Education Support Services (TESS), EMTAS, Specialist Sensory Education Team (SSET) and special school outreach. These services are routinely used by schools. • Engagement Centres: Are a well-embedded early intervention offer and demonstrate positive impact on attendance, emotional wellbeing and reintegration into mainstream education, supporting children and young people at risk of disengagement. • Mainstream inclusion: The number of children and young people with an EHCP attending mainstream education has increased over the last two years from 1,489 to 1,668. • Good in borough inclusion: Wigan educates over 92% of its EHCP cohort within the borough, significantly reducing reliance on out-of-area placements. • High quality special school provision: Wigan has six maintained special schools, all judged Good or Outstanding by Ofsted (under the previous framework), providing confidence in the quality of specialist provision for children and young people with the most complex and severe needs. • Early years support: Strong early identification and intervention through well-coordinated early years services and ensures children’s needs are recognised and supported at the earliest stage, helping to support settings and primary schools to respond to their needs. • Specialist outreach services: Specialist outreach teams provide both in-reach and outreach support to mainstream schools, enabling staff to effectively meet children’s needs, build capacity, and sustain inclusive practice. • Special school capacity: There is strong local specialist capacity compared to statistical neighbours - special school places account for around 29% of the EHCP cohort, which is high relative to statistical neighbours and demonstrates strong local specialist sufficiency. As of September 2025, Wigan offered 1,185 maintained special school places, with planned surplus built deliberately at Landgate School (Primary and Secondary) to manage future demand and prevent avoidable independent placements. • Capital investment: Capital investment has been secured for the rebuild and expansion of Hope School and Rowan Tree School, collectively creating additional capacity and improving the quality and sustainability of provision over the next two years. Our areas for development… • Demand and capacity pressures: Educational Psychology, Speech and Language Therapy capacity and | Specialist support is available early, universally and without waiting for diagnosis Within three years, Wigan will have shift practice to so that specialist advice and support is available at the earliest opportunity rather than through diagnosis or statutory routes. Children and young people will experience: • Earlier access to specialist advice based on presenting need rather than diagnostic labels • Faster, more proportionate responses that prevent escalation and crisis • Greater continuity of support close to home, reducing anxiety and disruption. As a result: • Demand for diagnosis-led escalation and unnecessary EHC needs assessments will reduce • Statutory processes will be reserved for children whose needs cannot reasonably be met through sustained, well evidenced local support. Schools and settings are confident to meet a wide range of needs inclusively Mainstream schools, early years settings and colleges will be confident and well supported to meet increasingly complex needs. Universal and targeted strategies will be used effectively as standard practice, underpinned by timely specialist input. Outcomes over three years: • Schools respond earlier to emerging needs, particularly around speech, language, communication and neurodivergence • Workforce confidence increases, reducing reliance on exclusionary practice and placement change • Fewer placement breakdowns as needs are anticipated and addressed sooner. Experts at Hand is embedded as the backbone of the system Experts at Hand will be a fully embedded, trusted and visible system enabler, organising and deploying Wigan’s existing strengths - EPS, SALT, TESS, EMTAS and special school outreach - into a coherent and equitable offer. Children and families will experience: • Advice and support accessed through consultation, coaching and joint problem solving rather than thresholds and referrals • Greater consistency regardless of phase, setting or locality. As a result: • Specialist expertise will build capacity and expertise in mainstream settings |
| Local blueprint for the next 3 years | Where we are | Where we will be in the next 3 years |
|---|---|---|
| SEND locally, strengthen inclusive practice and ensure that specialist provision contributes to a wider, connected system rather than operating in isolation. Sufficiency Planning and Strategic Use of Data: A sustainable SEND system depends on intelligent, forward-looking planning. Robust use of data on demand, need, placement trends and outcomes will inform strategic commissioning, investment and place planning. This will ensure that the right local provision is available at the right time, reduce reliance on out of borough placements and support better value for money alongside improved outcomes for children and young people. Inclusion Bases in Mainstream Schools: Inclusion Bases will provide targeted, flexible and time limited support within mainstream schools. They will enable children and young people to remain in their local community school while accessing enhanced provision as required. This model strengthens inclusion by supporting participation in mainstream education, preventing unnecessary movement into specialist pathways and enabling smoother transitions back into full mainstream learning. Resourced Provision within Mainstream Schools: Resourced provision increases local capacity to support children and young people with more complex needs within a mainstream context. By combining specialist environments, skilled staffing and access to mainstream learning opportunities, resourced provision will provide an inclusive alternative to special school placement for some learners, supporting locality-based solutions and inclusive pathways. SEN Units in mainstream schools: SEN Units will continue to provide specialist provision for children and young people with the most severe and complex needs. Strong links to mainstream schools, local communities and wider SEND pathways will ensure that these settings support inclusion by design, enabling flexibility, step down opportunities where appropriate and clear progression routes tailored to individual needs. Capital Investment in Inclusive Local Provision: Strategic capital investment is a critical enabler of system sustainability. Investment will support the development and long-term viability of Inclusion Bases, Resourced Provision, SEN Units and Alternative Provision. This will strengthen Wigan’s local SEND and inclusion offer, reduce reliance on external placements and ensure environments are fit for purpose and aligned to evolving patterns of need. Clear, Time Limited Alternative Provision Pathways: Alternative Provision will be purposeful, integrated and time bound. Clear entry and exit criteria, alongside coordinated SEND support, wellbeing | neurodevelopmental pathways continue to limit timely access to advice and intervention. Waiting times and thresholds contribute to a system where support is often accessed too late, driving escalation and reliance on statutory processes. • Constraints in EPS, SALT and neurodevelopmental assessment capacity: Early, needs-led support is not always accessible. As a result, families and schools often experience reliance on diagnosis or EHCP pathways as the primary means of securing support. • A significant proportion of Wigan’s EHCP cohort is educated in special schools: As of January 2026, approximately 37.5% of children with EHCPs attend special schools, which is above national averages and reflects continued pressure on mainstream inclusion and early intervention. • Low mainstream capacity: Only around 1.3% of the EHCP cohort is placed in SEN Units or Resourced Provision, indicating under-utilisation of specialist models within mainstream settings that could act as an alternative to full special school placement. • Increasing use of longer-term Alternative Provision: The number of children with SEND in Alternative Provision has increased, with placements most associated with behavioural need. Evidence shows that some placements extend beyond their intended short-term purpose, with weaker and less consistent reintegration back into mainstream education. • Over-reliance on high-cost specialist and independent provision continues to create significant financial pressure: Independent placements have increased by 266% since 2020, with average costs reaching £49,000 per placement, contributing to a £31m High Needs Block deficit and an unsustainable long-term trajectory without system change. • Mainstream schools have absorbed a 107% increase in pupils with EHCPs since 2020: Without a corresponding increase in access to early specialist support or intermediate provision, increasing the risk of placement breakdown and escalation. Status of our key enablers: • Balanced System approach: Not yet emerged Work is focused on understanding the impact of Greater Manchester models, clarifying system design, roles and thresholds, and assessing alignment with existing Wigan pathways. The approach has not yet translated into operational delivery or consistent practice, and there is no formal framework in place at this stage. • Experts at Hand model: Not yet emerged Strong foundation of multi-disciplinary specialist advice, coaching and consultation is currently accessible to schools and settings through free and traded offers. The capacity requires deployment into a universal model underpinned by evidence- | • Variability in access and late intervention will be significantly reduced • Specialist input will be used efficiently, preventing escalation and duplication. A balanced continuum of provision will replace binary choices Wigan will no longer operate an implicit “mainstream or special/AP” model. Instead, children and young people will move through a clear, graduated continuum of provision based on need and response to intervention. This will result in: • Increased use of Inclusion Bases, Resourced Provision and SEN Units within mainstream schools • Special schools used proportionately for children with the most complex and severe needs • Clear pathways and step-down routes to reduce inappropriate escalation and long-term segregation. This is expected to reduce the proportion of the children with EHC Plans educated in special schools over time. Alternative Provision is purposeful, time limited and outcome driven Alternative Provision will be used as a high-quality intervention, not a long-term destination. Within three years: 1. Entry, duration and exit expectations are consistently applied 2. SEND and therapeutic support is integrated from the outset 3. Engagement Centres and Three Towers continue to stabilise and re-engage pupils effectively 4. The Alternative Provision Free School increases local capacity and strengthens reintegration. This will ultimately result in: • Shorter lengths of stay in Alternative Provision • Stronger reintegration back to mainstream or progression into appropriate provision • Reduced drift and fewer repeat or extended AP placements. Sufficiency planning drives earlier, smarter investment Provision, commissioning and capital decisions will be led by intelligent use of data rather than crisis response. Over the next three years there will be: • Increased investment in mainstream-based specialist provision that prevents escalation • Reduced growth in independent and high-cost placements • Better alignment between demand, capacity and workforce planning. |
| Local blueprint for the next 3 years | Where we are | Where we will be in the next 3 years |
|---|---|---|
| and therapeutic input, will ensure that Alternative Provision supports stabilisation, re-engagement and reintegration wherever possible. This will reduce drift, support better outcomes and ensure Alternative Provision operates as part of a planned pathway rather than an endpoint. Alternative Provision Capacity – Three Towers and Engagement Centres: Wigan’s Alternative Provision offer, including Three Towers and Engagement Centres, will provide targeted capacity to meet the needs of children and young people at risk of disengagement. Engagement Centres will deliver short term, early intervention support focused on stabilisation, relationship repair and reintegration, closely aligned with mainstream schools and wider SEND pathways to prevent escalation. Alternative Provision Free School: A Wigan based Alternative Provision Free School will increase high quality local capacity and strengthen the continuum of support. Its design will align closely with reintegration to mainstream education wherever appropriate, ensuring Alternative Provision contributes to long term outcomes rather than sustained separation. Fair Access Protocol: A strong, consistently applied Fair Access Protocol is essential to equity and shared responsibility. Effective implementation will ensure that vulnerable children and young people, including those with emerging or unmet SEND, are placed quickly and fairly. This will support system wide inclusion, reduce unmanaged mobility and prevent escalation driven by placement instability. Pre Diagnosis, Needs Led Pathways for Neurodivergent Children and Young People: Support will be driven by presenting need rather than diagnostic thresholds. Pre-diagnosis, needs led pathways will ensure early access to strategies, reasonable adjustments and advice, reducing delays, supporting families and preventing escalation linked to waiting for formal diagnosis. | informed EEF approaches and clarity of routes of access and equity across all phases and settings. • Special school expertise and outreach model: Developing Special schools are routinely sharing expertise through structured outreach, coaching and joint working. This model is well-established and trusted, contributing to improved mainstream capacity to meet complex need locally and supporting inclusion and placement stability. • Sufficiency planning: Developing Use of data on demand, need and placement trends is increasingly informing strategic planning and investment decisions. A SEND-specific sufficiency plan is in place, though continued refinement is required to align emerging need with capital and commissioning decisions and fully mitigate future demand pressures. • Inclusion Bases in mainstream schools: Emerging Inclusion Bases are established within two mainstream high schools and provide targeted, flexible support. Early delivery demonstrates positive impact, with planned expansion required to ensure consistency, sustainability and borough-wide coverage. • Resourced Provision: Developing Resourced provision in mainstream schools is expanding and contributing to increased local capacity for children and young people with more complex needs. Work continues to strengthen quality, coherence and integration with mainstream learning and wider SEND pathways. • SEN Units: Emerging Wigan’s first SEN Units opened in September 2026 and are providing specialist provision for children and young people with the most severe and complex needs while maintaining strong links to local communities and inclusive pathways. Further work is required to expand the model across primary and secondary as an alternative to special schools. • Capital investment in inclusive local provision: Developing Strategic capital investment is actively supporting the development and sustainability of Inclusion Bases, Resourced Provision, SEN Units and alternative provision. Investment decisions are increasingly aligned to sufficiency planning, though demand pressures continue due to pressures within the special school sector which cannot keep pace with demand. • Clear, time-limited alternative provision pathways: Emerging Alternative provision pathways are increasingly defined with clearer expectations around entry, exit and duration. Integrated SEND and therapeutic support is improving, with further work required to ensure consistent application and sustained reintegration outcomes. • Three Towers: Developing The Three Towers model is a well-established component of local Alternative Provision, currently providing 28 primary, 152 | This will result in improved financial sustainability and greater value for money alongside improved outcomes for children and families. Shared responsibility for inclusive cultures will be embedded Inclusion will be the norm, not the exception, underpinned by Progress with Unity ways of working. By 2029: • Escalation and placement decisions will be collective, transparent and child centred • Fair Access principles will be applied consistently, including for children with SEND • Families will experience clearer routes, fewer “gateways” and earlier help. The impact we expect to see Over the next three years, Building Block 3 will deliver measurable system change, resulting in: 1. Earlier access to specialist support without diagnosis 2. Greater use of Inclusion Bases, Resourced Provision and SEN Units as alternatives to special schools 3. More purposeful and time limited use of Alternative Provision with stronger reintegration 4. Reduced reliance on independent provision 5. More children and young people successfully supported in mainstream education, close to home 6. Increased confidence from schools, professionals and families that needs will be met locally and early. |
secondary and 13 medical needs places. Ongoing review focuses on quality, outcomes, but further alignment with reintegration and has been agreed for KS3 pupils from September 2026.
- Engagement Centres: Maturing
Engagement Centres are a well-embedded early intervention offer, providing short-term, targeted support for children and young people at risk of disengagement. They are effectively supporting stabilisation, attendance, inclusion and reintegration, with strong links to mainstream schools and SEND pathways.
- Alternative Provision Free School: Emerging
Development of a Wigan-based Alternative Provision Free School is at an early stage, with clear strategic intent to increase high-quality local capacity and strengthen reintegration pathways and long-term outcomes.
- Fair Access Protocol: Developing
The Fair Access Protocol is established and increasingly effective in securing timely and equitable placements for vulnerable children and young people. Consistency of application and shared ownership across schools continues to strengthen. Fair Access principles need to be extended to SEN pupils.
- Pre-diagnosis, needs-led pathways for neurodivergent
children and young people: Emerging There is a growing shift towards needs-led support prior to diagnosis, improving early access to strategies, adjustments and advice. Further work is required to ensure consistent understanding and confidence across all partners and settings.
- Alignment to Progress with Unity ways of working:
Maturing The principles of prevention, collaboration and accountability are well-embedded across specialist support and placement planning. These ways of working support shared ownership, inclusive practice and long-term system sustainability by design. Maturity Matrix position (March 2026):
Pillar 4: High Quality Service Delivery: Developing
Pillar 7: Use of Resources – Developing
| Success measures | Baseline | Target Metrics |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Earlier access to specialist support without diagnosis | 1. Number of children without EHC Plans accessing Educational Psychology support - 414 (2025/26) | 1. By 2029, more than 700 children per year receiving EP support without an EHCP. |
| 2. Number of children without EHC Plans accessing Occupational Therapy support – 292 (2025/26) | 2. By 2029, the number of children without EHC Plans accessing Occupational Therapy support will increase– 375. |
| Success measures | Baseline | Target Metrics |
|---|---|---|
| 3. Number of children without EHC Plans accessing Speech and Language Therapy support – 1,820 (2025/26) | 3. By 2029, the number of children without EHC Plans accessing Speech and Language Therapy support will increase – 2,550. | |
| 2. Greater use of Inclusion Bases, Resourced Provision and SEN Units as alternative to special schools | 4. Number of children and young people with EHC Plans in support bases in mainstream schools – 120 (2025/26) | 4. By 2029, more than 2,400 children will be accessing support bases in mainstream schools. |
| 5. Number of children and young people with EHC Plans in specialist bases in mainstream schools – 60 (May 2026) | 5. By 2029, the number of children and young people in specialist bases will increase above 352 in line with our sufficiency plans. | |
| 6. Number of children in state funded special schools (maintained and academies) – 1,140 (May 2026) | 6. By 2029, the number of children in state-funded special schools will remain stable at 1,250. | |
| 3. More purposeful and time limited use of Alternative Provision with stronger reintegration | 7. Number of children in an Alternative Provision Place (School arranged) – 128 (Autumn Term 2025) | 7. By 2029, the number of pupils with SEND in school arranged Alternative Provision will reduce by 30% - 90. |
| 8. Number of pupils in school arranged Alternative Provision place for more than 6-months – 102 (Autmn Term 2025) | 8. By 2029, the number of pupils in school arranged Alternative Provision for more than 6-months will reduce to less than 30 (76% reduction). | |
| 9. Number of pupils with SEND in school arranged Alternative Provision – 38 (May 2026) | 9. By 2029, the number of CYP with EHC Plans forecasted to be in Alternative Provision will reduce to less than 100. | |
| 4. Reduced reliance on independent provision | 10. The number of children with EHC Plans who have moved from a mainstream to special school – 123 (Calendar Year 2025). | 10. By 2029, the number of children with EHC Plans who have moved from a mainstream to special school will reduce to less than 50. |
| 5. Reduced reliance on independent provision | 11. Number of children with EHC Plans in NMSS or independent provision – 304 (May 2026) | 11. By 2029, the number of children with EHC Plans in NMSS or independent places will reduce by 23% to 235. |
| 6. More children and young people successfully supported in mainstream education, close to home | 12. Proportion of children and young people with EHC Plans educated in borough – 92% (January 2026 Census) | 12. By 2029, the proportion of children and young people with EHC Plans education in borough will increase to 95%. |
| 13. Proportion of children and young people with EHC Plans educated in mainstream provision – 42.6% (May 2026) | 13. By 2029, the proportion of pupils educated in mainstream provision will increase to more than 48%. | |
| 7. Increased confidence from schools, professionals and families that needs will be met locally and early. | 14. Number of stage 1 complaints regarding SEND - 74 (2025 Calendar Year) | 14. By 2029, the number of stage 1 complaints regarding SEND will reduce to less than 50. |
| 15. School SENCos reporting that they are confident / somewhat confident implementing Wigan’s OAIP document and toolkit – 77.4% | 15. By 2029, the proportion of SENCos reporting that they are entirely confident will increase to 90%. |
Building Block 4: Encouraging inclusive culture and behaviours
| Local blueprint for the next 3 years | Where we are | Where we will be in the next 3 years |
|---|---|---|
| Building Block 4: Encouraging inclusive culture and behaviours Wigan’s ambition over the next three years: SEND and Inclusion is Everybody’s Business. By 2029, Wigan will have a skilled, confident and accountable workforce across education, health and care, able to meet children and young people’s special educational needs early and inclusively. Professionals across mainstream early years settings, schools, colleges, health and care services will be confident to: • Identify and respond to needs early • Adapt teaching, environments and support without waiting for assessment, diagnosis or statutory plans • Use evidence-informed approaches to decide what can and should be met without escalation. Specialist Support Packages, Education, Health and Care (EHC) Plans and specialist placements will be reserved for children and young people with the most complex and severe needs, ensuring sustainability of the system and improved outcomes for all. Key enablers for Building Block 4: The successful delivery of Building Block 4 is underpinned by a set enabler which will strengthen workforce capability and confidence, reduce reliance on statutory processes, and ensure that escalation to EHC needs assessment is purposeful, proportionate and evidence based. SEND Workforce Strategy: A whole-system SEND Workforce Strategy provides the foundation for sustainable inclusion across early years, schools, colleges and universal health and care services and is jointly owned by education, health and care partners. Over the next three years, the strategy will: • Prioritise confidence and capability at SEN Support • Target known pressure points, including secondary settings and areas of SLCN, SEMH and neurodiversity • Define expected competencies for all staff, not only SEND specialists • Align workforce development to reduced escalation, improved placement stability and better outcomes. Clear milestones, expectations and impact measures will be in place, with engagement tracked and reported through partnership governance. Borough-wide Inclusion and SEND Training: Consistent, borough-wide SEND and inclusion training strengthens inclusive practice across all settings and reduces escalation driven by uncertainty or low confidence. Training programmes are: • Needs-led, informed by local data and system pressures | What is working well… • Strong inclusive ambition and leadership: Inclusion is prioritised across the partnership, with clear strategic oversight, strong governance and alignment to Progress with Unity ways of working. • Early identification and early help: Improvements to Early Health Notifications, Family Hubs and early years pathways mean needs of younger children are identified earlier and support is targeted to those with the most complex needs. • Ordinarily Available and Inclusive Provision (OAIP): OAIP has been rolled out to over 90% of schools, improving staff confidence to meet children’s special educational needs. • Positive inclusion in schools: Over 92% of pupils with an EHC Plan are educated in borough, improving KS1 and 2 outcomes for SEND pupils, and reductions in permanent exclusions for children with SEND. • Effective targeted support: Engagement Centres and targeted education support are supporting reintegration and improving emotional wellbeing for children at risk of exclusion. • Skilled and stable workforce in key services: High quality education support services are available at a universal and traded level through Educational Psychology, Targeted Education Support Services, Specialist Sensory Education Services which enable high-quality SEND and inclusive practice in mainstream schools. • Strong multi-agency working: Education, health and care partners work collaboratively, particularly around attendance, mental health, alternative provision and early intervention. • Improving use of data and insight: SEND scorecards, dashboards and Quality Assurance activity provide leaders with a clear understanding of pressures, performance and priorities, enabling targeted action. Our areas for development… • Reducing reliance on statutory processes: Too many children escalate to EHC needs assessment where needs could be met earlier through stronger, more confident support in mainstream settings. • Inclusive practice, especially in secondary schools, needs to improve: Inclusion and confidence in meeting SEND is stronger in the primary phase than secondary, contributing to higher exclusions, Alternative Provision use and parental pressure to escalate. • Workforce confidence and capability at SEN Support: While training and supervision are in place, staff confidence remains variable, particularly around SLCN, SEMH and neurodiversity, leading to risk-averse decision-making. • Data integration and use of impact measures: Although data is available, it is not yet consistently integrated across | The workforce will have the skills and confidence to meet children’s special educational needs By 2029, Wigan will have a skilled, confident and accountable workforce across education, health and care, able to meet children and young people’s special educational needs early and inclusively. Professionals working in mainstream early years settings, schools, colleges, health and care services will be confident to: • Identify and respond to needs early • Adapt teaching, environments and support without waiting for assessment, diagnosis or statutory plans • Make evidence-informed decisions about what can and should be met without escalation. This will be underpinned by a refreshed, whole-system SEND Workforce Strategy jointly owned by education, health and care partners. The strategy will clearly define expected competencies for all staff (not just SEND specialists), target known pressure points including secondary settings and areas of SLCN, SEMH and neurodiversity, and align workforce development to reduced escalation, improved placement stability and better outcomes for children and young people with SEND. We will track engagement in training and professional development across the system and incentivise early years settings, schools and colleges to engage in whole-setting SEND workforce development. Participation and impact will be monitored through partnership governance, workforce confidence measures and changes in escalation patterns. We will strengthen inclusive practice in mainstream provision We will review and revise the Ordinarily Available Inclusive Practice (OAIP) guidance, so it is practical, evidence-informed and outcome focused, supported by clear tools, exemplification and workforce development. This will ensure staff feel confident and supported to meet needs early and inclusively across all phases. A shared Quality Inclusion Framework will define and benchmark high-quality inclusive practice, setting clear expectations for leadership, teaching, environments and SEN Support in mainstream settings. The framework will align with OAIP and national inclusion standards and will be embedded through peer-to-peer review, reflective practice and professional learning. Learning from peer review will drive improvement at both setting and system level. We will reduce escalation by design We will rebalance the system away from unnecessary statutory escalation by strengthening early intervention and confident SEN |
| Local blueprint for the next 3 years | Where we are | Where we will be in the next 3 years |
|---|---|---|
| • Differentiated to meet the needs of early years, primary, secondary and post-16 phases • Explicitly focused on practice change, not attendance alone. Participation will be incentivised and quality-assured through commissioning mechanisms, contractual expectations, peer review and governance oversight. Impact will be monitored through workforce confidence measures and changes in escalation patterns. Quality Inclusion Framework: A shared Quality Inclusion Framework defines, benchmarks and continuously improves high-quality inclusive practice in mainstream settings. The framework: • Sets clear expectations for inclusive leadership, teaching, environments and SEN Support • Aligns with Ordinarily Available Inclusive Practice and national inclusion standards • Is delivered through peer-to-peer review, reflective practice and professional learning. Findings from peer review are used to support improvement at both setting and system level, reducing inappropriate escalation to the EHC pathway and strengthening accountability for inclusion. Ordinarily Available Inclusive Practice (OAIP): Ordinarily Available Inclusive Practice provides clear, trusted expectations for what should be routinely available in mainstream settings without the need for statutory plans. The OAIP guidance will be reviewed and strengthened to ensure it is: • Practical, evidence informed and outcome focused • Supported by tools, exemplification and training • Embedded consistently across phases and settings. Implementation fidelity and impact will be monitored through quality assurance activity, peer review and SEND data dashboards to ensure that OAIP translates into improved outcomes and reduced reliance on EHC needs assessments. Graduated Response: The graduated response – assess, plan, do, review – underpins all SEND support in Wigan. To improve consistency and confidence, the system will: • Embed outcome-focused Individual SEND Support Plans across mainstream settings • Require clear evidence of review and adaptation over time • Apply shared, multi-agency thresholds before escalation. Requests for EHC needs assessment will be expected to demonstrate: • What support has already been provided • How interventions have been reviewed and refined • Why needs cannot be met through SEN Support and ordinarily available provision. | education, health and care or routinely used to evidence the impact of SEN support interventions. • Consistency of the graduated response and thresholds: Assess–plan–do–review cycles are well understood but applied unevenly, resulting in variation in escalation decisions across schools and services. • Parental confidence in mainstream inclusion: Despite strong local provision, some families still perceive statutory plans or specialist settings as the only route to secure support, driving avoidable escalation. Status of our key enablers: SEND Workforce Strategy – Developing A system-wide SEND Workforce Strategy implemented in 2024 now requires further review and revisions to target whole SEND workforce development focused on upskilling all staff and reducing the escalation of need. Borough-wide inclusion and SEND training – Developing Training programmes are in place is strengthening workforce confidence, with further work needed to ensure consistent reach and sustained practice change. Inclusion Quality Framework – Emerging A shared SEND Peer to Peer Review Framework is in place and increasingly used to improve inclusive practice and SEND provision. However, further development is needed to ensure engagement from all settings, drive consistent impact and embed learning at both an operational and strategic level. Ordinarily Available Inclusive Practice – Developing Expectations are clearer and increasingly trusted, However, implementation across settings does not consistently materialise into improved outcomes for children and young people with SEND. Graduated response to need – Developing The graduated response is well understood across the system. However, when cases progress into statutory pathways, the documentation does not always clearly demonstrate the impact of earlier interventions or how support has been reviewed and refined over time in response to emerging and developing needs. Early access to specialist advice (Experts at Hand) – Developing Specialist consultation and whole-setting support are available including Targeted Education Support Services, Educational Psychology, Specialist Sensory Education Support Services, EMTAS and Outreach Services, although in some mainstream schools there remains a dependency on specialists, SENCos and teaching assistants to meet children’s special educational needs and there is a reliance on statutory pathways and special school places. High quality supervision – Emerging Reflective supervision is established in parts of the system but is not yet a universal expectation. Relational practice – Developing | Support. We will reduce escalation through: • Stronger early intervention pathways and multi-agency problem solving • Consistent use of outcome-focused Individual SEND Support Plans in mainstream settings • Regular review and refinement of support through assess– plan–do–review cycles • Access to specialist advice without the need to trigger statutory assessment or diagnostic processes • Clear, shared thresholds and collective decision making before escalation to the EHC needs assessment pathway. Requests for EHC needs assessment will be expected to demonstrate: • What support has already been provided • How provision has been reviewed and adapted over time • Why needs cannot be met through the child’s Individual SEND Support Plan and SEND provision in a mainstream school. This will ensure escalation is purposeful, proportionate and transparent. We will embed early access to specialist advice through Experts at Hand The Experts at Hand offer will underpin the local system and be central to delivering Building Block 4. It will provide early, non-statutory access to specialist advice through consultation, coaching and whole-setting development. The delivery model will be jointly owned by the local authority and health partners and integrated through agreed partnership and commissioning arrangements. It will enhance existing routes to specialist input rather than duplicating them and will be accessed equitably across early years, schools and post-16 provision. Clear access routes, response expectations and success measures will ensure Experts at Hand builds mainstream capacity, reduces reactive responses to need and prevents avoidable referrals into statutory pathways. We will build confidence in mainstream SEND provision We recognise that families and settings often escalate because statutory routes feel like the only reliable way to secure support. We will rebalance this by: • Making early and targeted support visible, accessible and trusted • Ensuring schools and services are supported to include children and young people with SEND, not penalised for doing so |
| Local blueprint for the next 3 years | Where we are | Where we will be in the next 3 years |
|---|---|---|
| This ensures escalation is purposeful, proportionate and transparent. Early Access to Specialist Advice – Experts at Hand: The Experts at Hand offer is central to Building Block 4 and provides early, non-statutory access to specialist advice. The delivery model is jointly owned by the local authority and health partners and integrated through agreed partnership and commissioning arrangements. It enhances existing routes to specialist input rather than duplicating them. Experts at Hand provides: • Consultation and coaching for practitioners • Whole-setting development support • Early specialist advice without triggering statutory assessment or diagnosis. Clear access routes, response expectations and success measures are in place to ensure equitable use across all settings, including early years and post-16, and to prevent over-reliance by the most proactive schools. Reflective Supervision: Reflective supervision supports confident, evidence-based decision making and reduces risk-averse escalation. Over the next three years, reflective supervision will become a universal expectation for SEND-relevant roles across education, health and care. Supervision will: • Support professional judgement • Encourage critical reflection on escalation decisions • Strengthen consistency and confidence in SEN Support. Relational Practice: Relational practice is critical to reducing escalation driven by fear that statutory processes are the only option. Trusted relationships between professionals, families and services are strengthened through: • Clear communication and shared problem solving • Early challenge and resolution of concerns • Consistent involvement of families in planning and review. SENDIASS and the Parent Carer Forum play a key role in reinforcing trust in mainstream provision and early support pathways. Peer Learning and Support: Peer learning enables shared problem solving across settings and with specialists. Structured peer networks, SENCO collaboration and peer review processes: • Spread effective practice • Build confidence in meeting need earlier • Reduce isolation and reactive decision making. Learning is captured and fed back into workforce development and system improvement activity. | Relationship-based approaches are embedded in principle, with variable experience for families and professionals. • Peer learning and support – Emerging Peer support and shared learning are beginning to develop, with scope to formalise and scale impact. • Evidence-informed practice – Developing Use of agreed evidence is increasing but not yet systematic across the system. • Multi-agency accountability for inclusion – Emerging Shared ownership across education, health and care is strengthening, though siloed decision-making persists driving exclusionary practices. • Effective use of data – Developing There is a rich level of data available and is driving systemic improvements to practice. However, further development is needed across all partners to routinely track the impact of mainstream SEND provision and escalation patterns. • Joined-up digital systems – Emerging Digital systems are improving information sharing, with integration still at an early stage. Maturity Matrix Assessment (March 2026): • Pillar 4: Inclusive Service Delivery – Developing • Pillar 6: Skilled Workforce – Developing • Pillar 3: Data & Understanding of Need – Developing. | • Reducing variation in practice that currently pushes escalation “just in case” or because of fear. Relational practice will be strengthened through clear communication, shared problem solving and consistent involvement of families in planning and review. SENDIASS and the Parent Carer Forum will play a key role in reinforcing confidence in mainstream provision and early support pathways. We will embed a shared workforce responsibility for SEND SEND is not the responsibility of a single role, setting or service. We will: • Embed inclusion as a shared professional expectation across education, health and care services • Develop a common language around need, support and thresholds • Strengthen peer learning and shared problem solving across settings and with specialists • Use agreed evidence-based strategies and interventions consistently across the system. • Build joint ownership for reducing escalation and improving the outcomes and experiences of children with SEND. Reflective supervision will become a universal expectation for SEND-relevant roles across education, health and care, supporting confident, evidence-based decision making and reducing risk-averse escalation. We will embed system wide inclusive leadership Leaders at all levels will champion inclusive practice and ensure that decision-making about escalation is collective, transparent and child-centred, not driven by risk-aversion or system pressure. Delivery of Building Block 4 will be overseen by a named SEND Reform Senior Responsible Officer, reporting through the SEND and Alternative Provision Partnership Board and aligned to Children’s Services leadership and Progress with Unity governance. Shared dashboards and joined-up digital systems will improve timeliness and information sharing, reduce duplication and delay, and support consistent application of thresholds and decision making across education, health and care. The impact we expect to see: • Fewer children escalating to the EHC pathway before receiving they help and support they need • Reduced inappropriate demand for EHC needs assessments • More children having needs met successfully in mainstream schools without an EHC Plan |
| Local blueprint for the next 3 years | Where we are | Where we will be in the next 3 years |
|---|---|---|
| Evidence-Informed Practice: Agreed, evidence-based strategies and interventions are essential to strengthening the impact of SEND support and reducing crisis-led requests for EHCPs. Practice will be aligned to: • Local and national evidence • Workforce training and supervision • Expected standards within the Quality Inclusion Framework/ Consistency of approach strengthens confidence and improves outcomes. Multi-Agency Accountability for Inclusion: Inclusion is a shared responsibility across education, health and care. Accountability is strengthened through: • Joint ownership of outcomes • Shared thresholds and decision-making processes • Clear escalation and dispute resolution routes Delivery of Building Block 4 is overseen by a named SEND Reform Senior Responsible Officer, reporting through the SEND and AP Partnership Board and aligned to Children’s Services and Progress with Unity governance structures. Effective Use of Data: Regular monitoring of operational activity and outcomes drives improvement and prevention. Shared dashboards track: • SEN Support effectiveness • Individual SEND Support Plans • Requests for EHC needs assessment and outcomes • Placement patterns and exclusions • Workforce engagement and confidence. Data is used proactively to identify pressure points early and inform targeted action. Joined-Up Digital Systems: Integrated digital systems improve timeliness and information sharing across education, health and care. Over the next three years, digital integration will: • Reduce duplication and delay • Improve access to shared records and plans • Support consistent application of thresholds and decision making. This reduces unnecessary escalation driven by system inefficiency rather than need. These enablers provide the practical infrastructure for Building Block 4. They shift the system from reactive escalation to confident, early and inclusive support, ensuring that statutory processes and specialist provision are used appropriately and sustainably. | • More confident and skilled workforce across education, health and social care meeting the needs of children with SEND • Specialist provision targeted to those who genuinely need it. |
| Success measures | Baseline | Target Metrics |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Fewer children escalating to the EHC pathway before receiving they help and support they need | 1. EHC referral for a needs assessment (all ages) - 1,051 (Calendar Year 2025). | 1. By 2029, the number of EHC referral for a needs assessment (all ages) will reduce from the forecast position of 1,185 to 1,141. |
| 2. The number of EHCNA that result in an EHC Plan - 721 (Calendar Year 2025). | 2. By 2029, the number of EHCNA that result in an EHC Plan will remain broadly stable – 939. | |
| 2. Reduced inappropriate demand for EHC needs assessments | 3. Percentage of initial request for assessment that were refused - 27.5% (Calendar Year 2025) | 3. By 2029, the percentage of initial request for assessment that are refused will stabilise at around 25.0%, |
| 4. Proportion of EHC needs assessments that result in an EHC Plan – 97% (Calendar Year 2025) | 4. By 2029 the proportion of EHC needs assessments that result in an EHC Plan will reduce to 85% | |
| 3. More children having needs met successfully in mainstream schools without an EHC Plan | 5. Number of pupils supported at SEN Support in Wigan schools – 7,829 (2026 School census) | 5. By 2029, the number of pupils supported at SEN Support in Wigan schools will increase to more than 8,503 (17.5% of the population). |
| 4. More confident and skilled workforce across education, health and social care meeting the needs of children with SEND | 6. Proportion of schools/settings engaged in SEND workforce development annually - 60% | 6. By 2029, the number of schools/settings engaged in SEND workforce development in increase to more than 95%. |
| 5. Specialist provision targeted to those who genuinely need it. | 7. Proportion of children with EHC Plans in special schools (including maintained, NMSS and independent) – 42.6% (May 2026) | 7. By 2029, the proportion of children and young people in special schools will reduce in line with the national average to less than 25%. |
- What is the local area partnership’s strategy for delivering on the above?
Wigan’s strategy is underpinned by an evidence-led Theory of Change, providing a shared framework across education, health and social care. It reflects a collective understanding that current pressures - rising demand for EHC plans, diagnosis-led pathways, reliance on specialist provision, workforce constraints and uneven outcomes - are driven by system design and experience rather than isolated service failure. The approach is grounded in lived experience and a strong evidence base, including:
- SEND JSNA
- SEND and Alternative Provision Scorecard
- SEND self-assessment
- Parental and young person annual surveys
- Local Partnership Maturity Assessment.
These confirm Wigan’s strengths with maturing arrangements in governance, partnership working and co-production, while identifying key areas for development where focused reform activity is required. In response, the partnership has prioritised a small number of high-impact system changes targeting root causes. At the heart of this strategy is a shift towards earlier intervention and shifting resources upstream. This includes strengthening early identification, particularly in early years, to reduce escalation and improve confidence in mainstream pathways. Alongside this, the partnership is building inclusive capacity through Ordinarily Available Inclusive Provision, expansion of SEN units and resourced provision, wider deployment of specialist expertise, and workforce development - enabling more children to be supported locally and reducing reliance on specialist placements. The strategy also addresses diagnosis-led escalation by embedding needs-led, pre-diagnosis support. In secondary phases, the focus is on improving attendance, reducing exclusions, and strengthening alternative provision and reintegration pathways. Strong leadership, shared accountability and workforce confidence underpin delivery. Progress is monitored through robust use of data and lived-experience insight, ensuring leaders understand both performance trends and how the system is experienced by families. Overall, Wigan’s strategy is to deliver SEND reform through disciplined, partnership-owned system change: investing earlier, strengthening inclusion, reducing unnecessary escalation, and using evidence and lived experience to drive continuous improvement and better outcomes for children and young people with SEND.
Attachment 1: Wigan’s Theory of Change
Wigan%20SEND%20 Reform%20Plan%20-
- Please upload a completed copy of the Local Partnership Maturity Assessment Tool.
Attachment 2: Wigan’s Maturity Matrix Assessment
Maturity%20Matrix% 20Assessment.xlsx
- What is the local area partnership roadmap for the next 3 years?
| Local roadmap for the next 3 years | 2026/27 | 2027/28 | 2028/29 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Building Block 1: Strengthening inclusion across education settings | • Ordinarily Available Inclusive Provision (OAIP) refresh scope agreed and guidance published (aligned to national inclusion standards). • Inclusion Bases and SEN Units development model specified; first wave agreed with schools and trusts and operational with clear entry/exit criteria. • Experts at Hand piloted across early years, primary and secondary phases. | • OAIP embedded across all settings, including post-16. • Inclusion Bases and SEN Units extended and functioning as a coherent local network. • SEND Support operating as the confident default; EHC requests stabilised or reduced. • Alternative Provision used consistently for short-term placement. | • Balance system model embedded across mainstream, inclusion bases and special schools. • Specialist provision used proportionately in line with national expectations. • Local SEND pathways redesigned and fully defined. • System able to operate in shadow form aligned to the national framework. |
| Local roadmap for the next 3 years | 2026/27 | 2027/28 | 2028/29 |
|---|---|---|---|
| • School Readiness and Transitions Strategy scoped, launched and embedded in early years and Year 6/7. • Alternative Provision pathways defined as time-limited with reintegration expectations. • SEND Support strengthened with OAIP as the default evidence base. • ISPs routinely used for children below the statutory threshold. | • Improved attendance, reduced exclusions and reduced AP duration at secondary phase | ||
| Building Block 2: System leadership, local partnership collaboration and coproduction | • SEND Reform Plan approved and submitted to DfE. • Single SEND programme governance established (SRO, Partnership Board, four workstreams aligned to building blocks). • Shared SEND outcomes framework agreed across education, health and care. • Core reform frameworks codesigned: Experts at Hand, Inclusion Bases/SEN Units, OAIP, Workforce Strategy, School Readiness and Transitions. • SEND dashboard launched as a single source of truth (demand, inclusion, outcomes and finance). | • SEND Reform Plan approved and submitted to DfE. • Single SEND programme governance established (SRO, Partnership Board, four workstreams aligned to building blocks). • Shared SEND outcomes framework agreed across education, health and care. • Core reform frameworks codesigned: Experts at Hand, Inclusion Bases/SEN Units, OAIP, Workforce Strategy, School Readiness and Transitions. • SEND dashboard launched as a single source of truth (demand, inclusion, outcomes and finance). | • Sufficiency and place-planning decisions agreed. • Commissioning contracts updated to align with national standards. • Transition arrangements agreed for ISPs, EHC plans and post-16 learners. • System readiness demonstrated to “switch on” new SEND arrangements |
| Local roadmap for the next 3 years | 2026/27 | 2027/28 | 2028/29 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Building Block 3: Access to specialist support and local placements | • Experts at Hand specified and piloted as a multidisciplinary, all-phase offer. • First wave of Inclusion Bases and SEN Units agreed and operational. • High Needs financial baseline, demand modelling and recovery trajectory agreed. • Local provision strengthened to reduce reliance on escalation to statutory pathways | • Experts at Hand expanded to additional school clusters and operating at meaningful scale. • Inclusion Bases and SEN Units extended beyond initial cohort. • Evidence of reduced reliance on independent special schools. • Local provision mapped against draft Specialist Provision Packages. | • Final Specialist Provision Packages confirmed. • Local SEND pathways redesigned to reflect national needs assessment approach. • High Needs financial trajectory stabilised with reduced use of independent placements. • Digital systems aligned to national assessment approach |
| Building Block 4: Encouraging inclusive culture and behaviours | • SEND Workforce Strategy refresh scoped. • Workforce development commissions agreed (secondary focus, SLCN, SEMH, neurodiversity). • Early years workforce connected through Best Start Family Hubs. • Inclusion, early support and graduated response reinforced as system norms. | • Reflective supervision embedded across SEND-relevant roles. • Workforce development embedded into routine CPD and induction. • ISPs embedded as the default graduated response. | • Workforce training plan updated to reflect forthcoming statutory model. • Workforce confident and consistent in the national SEND framework. • Culture embedded where inclusion is the default across all phases and partners |
Attachment 3: Key Milestones and Deliverables – 3 Year Roadmap: Key%20milestones% 20and%20deliverable Local Roadmap for the next 3 years:
| Local roadmap for the next 3 years | 2027 | 2028 | 2029 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Success measures | Key indicators | |||
| Children’s developmental needs will be identified and supported before school entry | Percentage of 2-year-olds benefiting from funded early education (national data) | 84% | 88% | 90% |
| Number of Early Health Notifications received (local data) | 350 | 380 | 410 | |
| Number of EHCNA requests by CYP age - under 5 years (DfE data submission) | 229 | 236 | 243 | |
| Number of CYP with EHCPs - under 5 years (DfE data submission) | 189 | 170 | 193 | |
| Number of requests for specialist provision at Reception are rising year on year (local data) | 128 | 115 | 104 | |
| Proportion of children meeting their developmental milestones as assessed by ASQ at 2.5 years 78% (Public Health) | 80.5% | 82.5% | 84.4% | |
| Proportion of children with an EHC Plan achieved a Good Level of Development (GLD) in the Early Years Foundation Stage Profile (national data) | 3.0% | 3.8% | 4.5% |
| Local roadmap for the next 3 years | 2027 | 2028 | 2029 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Success measures | Key indicators | |||
| More children and young people with SEND will have their needs met early and consistently in mainstream provision | Proportion of pupils with EHC Plans in mainstream primary (local data) | 64.0% | 64.5% | 65.0% |
| Proportion of pupils with EHC Plans in mainstream secondary (local data) | 45.0% | 50.0% | 52.0% | |
| Number of children with EHC Plans in specialist provision (DfE data submission) | 1,466 | 1,448 | 1,485 | |
| Number of children with EHC Plans in Alternative Provision (DfE data submission) | 49 | 69 | 96 | |
| Proportion of pupils with SEND (without an EHC Plan) in mainstream schools (School Census) | 16.5% | 17.0% | 17.5% | |
| Proportion of pupils with EHC Plans in mainstream schools (School Census) | 6.4% | 6.3% | 6.2% | |
| Stronger inclusion, attendance and outcomes at secondary phase | Rate of secondary attendance for SEND pupils (EHCP and SEN Support) (Nexus) | 87.5 | 88.2 | 89.0 |
| Rate of secondary severe absence for SEND pupils (EHCP and SEN Support) (Nexus) | 9.5 | 8.8 | 8.2 | |
| Rate of suspension for SEND pupils (EHCP and SEN Support) (Nexus) | 19.8 | 18.5 | 17.3 | |
| Rate of permanent exclusions for SEND pupils (EHCP and SEN Support) (Nexus) | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Local roadmap for the next 3 years | 2027 | 2028 | 2029 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Success measures | Key indicators | |||
| Reduced use of long-term reduced timetables | Number of all pupils in Wigan schools on a reduced timetable (local data) | 195 | 180 | 165 |
| Proportion of children with Wigan managed EHC Plans (R to Year 11) on a reduced timetable (local data) | 3.0% | 2.7% | 2.5% | |
| Number of pupils in Wigan schools on a reduced timetable for more than six months (local data) | 110 | 90 | 70 | |
| More trusting, confident relationships with families | Number of SEND tribunal appeals (DfE Data Submission) | 139 | 185 | 230 |
| Number of all CYP with SEN in Elective Home Education (DfE Data Submission) | 69 | 60 | 55 | |
| Earlier, joint intervention preventing escalation into statutory processes | Number of all EHCNA requests by CYP age - all ages (DfE Data Submission) | 1,075 | 1,107 | 1,141 |
| Number of all EHCNAs completed - all ages (DfE Data Submission) | 487 | 903 | 964 | |
| Number of all EHCNAs that result in an EHCP (DfE Data Submission) | 827 | 880 | 939 | |
| Number of CYP receiving individual top ups with no EHC plan (Early Years Additional Resource) - under 5 years (DfE Data Submission) | 78 | 81 | 83 | |
| Faster, more consistent EHC pathways where statutory plans are needed | Number of outstanding EHC Plan amendments following an Annual Review (local data) | 120 | 70 | 40 |
| Percentage of decisions to assess within 6 weeks (local data) | 94.5% | 97.0% | 98.5% |
| Local roadmap for the next 3 years | 2027 | 2028 | 2029 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Success measures | Key indicators | |||
| Percentage of initial requests for assessment that were refused (local data) | 25.5% | 25.3% | 25.0% | |
| Number of active EHC assessments over 20 weeks (local data) | 80 | 20 | 0 | |
| Percentage of EHC Plans issued within 20 weeks (including exceptions) (local data) | 35.0% | 60.0% | 78.0% | |
| Percentage of EHC Plans issued within 20 weeks (excluding exceptions) (local data) | 40.0% | 65.0% | 82.0% | |
| Reduced exits to other arrangements through stronger in-school support | Number of all CYP with SEN in local area not in education (DfE data submission) | 164 | 126 | 96 |
| Number of children with EHC Plans in EOTAS / other LA arrangements (DfE Data Submission) | 62 | 68 | 74 | |
| Number of CYP with EHCPS in Elective Home Education (DfE Data Submission) | 69 | 60 | 55 | |
| Greater placement stability and fewer breakdowns | Number of pupils with SEN and an EHC Plan in Wigan moving school following a suspension (local data) | 14 | 10 | 7 |
| Number of school moves for pupils with an EHC Plan (excluding planned moves such as house moves) (local data) | 10 | 7 | 5 | |
| Stronger trust from children, young people and families | Number of visits to the local offer (local data) | 30,000 | 31,500 | 33,000 |
| Number of mediations logged in the calendar year (local data) | 100 | 85 | 70 | |
| Proportion of mediation decisions conceded in the calendar year (local data) | 32% | 28% | 25% |
| Local roadmap for the next 3 years | 2027 | 2028 | 2029 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Success measures | Key indicators | |||
| Earlier access to specialist support without diagnosis | Number of children without EHC Plans accessing Educational Psychology support (DfE Data Submission) | 700 | 725 | 725 |
| Number of children without EHC Plans accessing Occupational Therapy support (DfE Data Submission) | 37 | 375 | 375 | |
| Number of children without EHC Plans accessing Speech and Language Therapy support (DfE Data Submission) | 2,450 | 2,550 | 2,550 | |
| Greater use of Inclusion Bases, Resourced Provision and SEN Units as alternative to special schools | Number of children and young people with EHC Plans in support bases in mainstream schools (DfE Data Submission) | 960 | 1,680 | 2,400 |
| Number of children and young people with EHC Plans in specialist bases in mainstream schools (DfE Data Submission) | 76 | 208 | 352 | |
| Number of children in state funded special schools (maintained and academies) (DfE Data Submission) | 1,156 | 1,198 | 1,250 | |
| More purposeful and time limited use of Alternative Provision with stronger reintegration | Number of all pupils in school arranged Alternative Provision Place (local data) | 115 | 102 | 90 |
| Number of pupils in school arranged Alternative Provision place for more than 6-months (local data) | 81 | 55 | 30 | |
| Number of CYP with EHC Plans in Alternative Provision (DfE Data Submission) | 49 | 69 | 96 | |
| Reduced reliance on independent provision | Number of children with EHC Plans in NMSS or independent provision (DfE Data Submission) | 310 | 250 | 235 |
| Number of children with EHC Plans who have moved from a mainstream to special (local data) | 100 | 75 | 50 | |
| More children and young people successfully supported in mainstream education, close to home | Proportion of children and young people with EHC Plans educated in borough (local data) | 94.0% | 94.5% | 95.0% |
| Local roadmap for the next 3 years | 2027 | 2028 | 2029 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Success measures | Key indicators | |||
| Proportion of children and young people with EHC Plans educated in mainstream provision (local data) | 43.3% | 46.4% | 48.3% | |
| Increased confidence from schools, professionals and families that needs will be met locally and early. | Number of stage 1 complaints regarding SEND (local data) | 87 | 63 | 50 |
| School SENCos reporting that they are confident / somewhat confident implementing Wigan’s OAIP document and toolkit (local data) | 85.0% | 87.0% | 90.0% | |
| Fewer children escalating to the EHC pathway before receiving they help and support they need | Number of all EHCNA requests by CYP age - all ages (DfE Data Submission) | 1,075 | 1,107 | 1,141 |
| Number of all EHCNAs that result in an EHCP (DfE Data Submission) | 827 | 880 | 939 | |
| Reduced inappropriate demand for EHC needs assessments | Percentage of initial requests for assessment that were refused (local data) | 25.5% | 25.3% | 25.0% |
| Proportion of EHC needs assessments that result in an EHC Plan (local data) | 85.0% | 80.0% | 75.0% | |
| More children having needs met successfully in mainstream schools without an EHC Plan | Number of pupils supported at SEN Support in Wigan schools (local data) | 12,000 | 13,800 | 15,000 |
| More confident and skilled workforce across education, health and social care meeting the needs of children with SEND | Proportion of schools/settings engaged in SEND workforce development annually (local data) | 75% | 85% | 95% |
| Specialist provision targeted to those who genuinely need it. | Proportion of children with EHC Plans in special schools (including maintained, NMSS and independent) (local data) | 31.6% | 27.4% | 24.7% |
- What will the local area partnership deliver in the first year?
| 2026-27 Local delivery plan | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workstream outline – mapped to building block Outcome - what you want to achieve with this workstream Success measures – how you measure progress drawing on metrics from the accompanying data template | Responsible lead per workstream – accountable for the delivery of the workstream and the identified outcome. | Milestones per workstream What key milestones will enable you achieve your targeted trajectory | Target trajectory per workstream Where do you expect your data to be? | Milestones per workstream What key milestones will enable you achieve your targeted trajectory | Target trajectory per workstream Where do you expect your data to be? | Milestones per workstream What key milestones will enable you achieve your targeted trajectory | Target trajectory per workstream Where do you expect your data to be? |
| Building Block 1: Strengthen Inclusion across education settings Outcome: Children’s developmental needs are identified and supported earlier, with more needs met confidently in mainstream provision. Success measures: • % of 2-year-olds in funded early education increases (target 84% by 2027) • Early Health Notifications increase to (target 350) • Reduction trend begins in Reception specialist requests (target 128) • Increase in EHCP pupils in mainstream primary (target 64%) and secondary (target 45%) • Improvement in secondary attendance (target 87.5%) | Head of Inclusion | • Pilot clusters established for Experts at Hand (multiphase) • OAIP refreshed and published • Inclusion Bases/SEN Units first wave agreed with schools • Workforce commissions agreed (SLCN, SEMH, ND) | • Early identification pipeline strengthening (increase in EHNs) • Schools begin using OAIP as core framework | • School readiness strategy launched via Family Hubs • Experts at Hand operational across pilot clusters • Inclusion Bases operational with entry/exit criteria • Transition planning embedded (EY to Reception, Y6 to Y7, Y11 to Y12) | • Reduction in escalation requests begins (Reception specialist demand stabilises) • Improved attendance indicators emerging | • OAIP in routine use for SEND Support decisions • ISPs operating below threshold • SEND dashboard live (single source of truth) • Early years workforce integrated into Family Hub | • Increased mainstream inclusion proportions • Stable or reduced demand for EHCNA in early years |
| Building Block 2: System leadership, local partnership collaboration and co-production | Head of SEND | • Single governance and panel structure embedded | • Stabilisation of referral volumes • Improved decisionmaking consistency | • Joint decisionmaking embedded across panels • Workforce training on thresholds and pathways | • Reduction in backlog • Increase in % decisions within 6 weeks | • Active cases >20 weeks significantly reduced | • Measurable improvement in 20week performance • Reduction in tribunal and mediation trends |
| 2026-27 Local delivery plan | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workstream outline – mapped to building block Outcome - what you want to achieve with this workstream Success measures – how you measure progress drawing on metrics from the accompanying data template | Responsible lead per workstream – accountable for the delivery of the workstream and the identified outcome. | Milestones per workstream What key milestones will enable you achieve your targeted trajectory | Target trajectory per workstream Where do you expect your data to be? | Milestones per workstream What key milestones will enable you achieve your targeted trajectory | Target trajectory per workstream Where do you expect your data to be? | Milestones per workstream What key milestones will enable you achieve your targeted trajectory | Target trajectory per workstream Where do you expect your data to be? |
| Outcome: Faster, more consistent EHC pathways with reduced inappropriate demand. Success measures: • Reduction in EHCNA requests (target towards 1,075) • Increase in timeliness (target towards 35% issued within 20 weeks) • Outstanding annual review amendments reduced (target less than 120) • Reduction in mediation volume (target 100) | • Shared thresholds agreed across education, health, care • EHC process redesign (endto-end) | • Digital tracking for timeliness implemented | • Timeliness improvement embedded • Families experience clearer pathways | ||||
| Building Block 3: Access to specialist support and local placements Outcome: More children supported locally through inclusion bases and earlier specialist support, reducing reliance on specialist and independent provision. Success measures • Increase in EHCP pupils in mainstream provision (target 43.3%) • Growth in support base placements (target 240) | Head of SEND | • Inclusion Base model agreed and first wave commissioned • AP pathways redesigned as time-limited • Commissioning assumptions aligned | • Stabilised use of AP • Early growth in base capacity | • Expansion planning for additional bases • Reintegration pathways from AP operational • Therapy access (EP, OT, SaLT) increased | • Reduction in longterm AP placements • Increased early specialist input without EHCP | • Inclusion Bases operational and networked • Local provision mapping completed • Evidence of reduced independent placements | • Increased inborough placements (~94%) • Growth in children supported in mainstream with support |
| 2026-27 Local delivery plan | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workstream outline – mapped to building block Outcome - what you want to achieve with this workstream Success measures – how you measure progress drawing on metrics from the accompanying data template | Responsible lead per workstream – accountable for the delivery of the workstream and the identified outcome. | Milestones per workstream What key milestones will enable you achieve your targeted trajectory | Target trajectory per workstream Where do you expect your data to be? | Milestones per workstream What key milestones will enable you achieve your targeted trajectory | Target trajectory per workstream Where do you expect your data to be? | Milestones per workstream What key milestones will enable you achieve your targeted trajectory | Target trajectory per workstream Where do you expect your data to be? |
| • Stabilisation of use of independent placements (target 310) • Reduction in AP duration – more than 6 months (target 81) | |||||||
| Building Block 4: Encouraging inclusive culture and behaviours Outcome: A confident workforce delivering highquality SEND Support, reducing reliance on EHC plans. Success measures: • Increase in SEN Support numbers (target: 8,100 by 2027) • Workforce engagement in training (target 75%) • Reduction in % of EHCNAs resulting in EHCP (target 85%) • SENCO confidence improving (target 75%) • Reduction in children in special schools (including maintained, NMSS and independent) (target 31%) | Head of Standards and Learning | • Workforce strategy scope agreed • CPD programmes commissioned (secondary focus) • OAIP training rollout begins | • Increased workforce engagement • Improved confidence baseline | • Reflective supervision embedded • Workforce training integrated into CPD/induction • SEND Support pathways embedded | • Increased SEN Support usage • Reduced inappropriate escalation | • Workforce operating consistently within new model • SEND Support as default across schools • Evidence of cultural shift in practice | • Stabilisation of EHC demand • Increased school confidence and reduced complaints |
| 2026-27 Local delivery plan | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workstream outline – mapped to building block Outcome - what you want to achieve with this workstream Success measures – how you measure progress drawing on metrics from the accompanying data template | Responsible lead per workstream – accountable for the delivery of the workstream and the identified outcome. | Milestones per workstream What key milestones will enable you achieve your targeted trajectory | Target trajectory per workstream Where do you expect your data to be? | Milestones per workstream What key milestones will enable you achieve your targeted trajectory | Target trajectory per workstream Where do you expect your data to be? | Milestones per workstream What key milestones will enable you achieve your targeted trajectory | Target trajectory per workstream Where do you expect your data to be? |
| Projected investment spend: Experts at Hand Direct Delivery: • EAH Transformation Costs = £260k • EAH Administration = £260k • Direct delivery = £2.08m Capital funding: • Support bases = £300k • Specialist bases = £150k • Special school – committed spend = £4,881m | Category Q2 Q3 Q4 Total EAH Transformation 182 52 26 260 EAH Administration 86.7 86.7 86.7 260 Direct Delivery 520 728 832 2,080 Total Revenue 788.7 866.7 944.7 2,600 Category Q2 Q3 Q4 Total Capital Programme 1,777 1,777 1,777 4,881 |
| Category | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EAH Transformation | 182 | 52 | 26 | 260 |
| EAH Administration | 86.7 | 86.7 | 86.7 | 260 |
| Direct Delivery | 520 | 728 | 832 | 2,080 |
| Total Revenue | 788.7 | 866.7 | 944.7 | 2,600 |
| Category | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capital Programme | 1,777 | 1,777 | 1,777 | 4,881 |
- How will the local area partnership deliver the first-year plan?
Wigan has robust organisational arrangements to ensure the Plan is delivered with pace, coherence and assurance, while maintaining statutory compliance during a period of sustained demand. Delivery will be driven through clear accountability, protected capacity and the right expertise at key stages of implementation.
- The Director of Education and Inclusion will act as the Sro, providing visible strategic leadership, oversight and assurance on delivery of the Plan.
- The Sro will be supported by the Head of SEND, ensuring sustained focus on reform, prioritisation and alignment with Progress with Unity and wider system transformation priorities.
- Day-to-day programme grip will be provided by a dedicated SEND Transformation Manager, responsible for sequencing delivery, managing risks and dependencies, and ensuring disciplined implementation.
Delivery capacity will be strengthened through a clear inclusion-led approach to increasing mainstream capacity and capability. This includes targeted workforce development, adaptive practice and the rollout of the Experts at Hand model to enable earlier intervention and reduce reliance on EHC pathways and specialist placements. This will include Educational Psychology, Specialist Teaching, Speech and Language (including contribution to an Advanced Practitioner role across Greater Manchester) and other specialist input where required. Expansion of SEND provision will be evidence-led and targeted, with universal access to support bases and specialist bases in mainstream schools for pupils with EHC Plans. This will be complemented by a planned improvement programme to the mainstream estate, aligned to the Council’s Accessibility Strategy (i.e. targeted adaptations, enabling environments and capital investment) to increase inclusive capacity within mainstream schools. Growth in the special school estate and AP will only be progressed where plans are already mobilised in line with Wigan’s SEND and AP Sufficiency Strategy. Dedicated data, analytics and finance capacity will underpin delivery, enabling robust forecasting, sufficiency planning, benefits realisation, financial sustainability and transparent reporting to governance boards and the DfE. Together, these arrangements ensure the Partnership has the capacity, capability and assurance required to deliver effectively.
- Other funding Local Authorities.
Block Transfers
Wigan has approved a block transfer of £1,419,000 from the Schools Block to the High Needs Block for 2026/27. This investment is a key enabler of the Year 1 SEND Reform Plan and is aligned to the partnership’s strategy to shift resource upstream, strengthen inclusion, and stabilise demand and cost. The funding will be used to accelerate delivery of the reform programme, specifically targeting the system changes set out across the four building blocks as follows: Strengthening Inclusion in Mainstream (Building Block 1) A proportion of the transfer will support:
- Delivery and rollout of Ordinarily Available Inclusive Provision (Oaip) across all phases
- Early intervention capacity, including Early Health Notifications and pre-statutory support (ISPs).
This directly supports the strategic ambition to ensure that needs are identified and met earlier in mainstream settings, reducing escalation into statutory and specialist pathways. System Leadership and EHC Pathway Improvement (Building Block 2) Funding will contribute to:
- SEND programme governance, data and dashboard infrastructure (“one source of truth”)
- Additional operational capacity to improve EHC timeliness, backlog reduction and consistency of decision-making.
This aligns with the plan’s focus on faster, more consistent EHC pathways and reduced inappropriate demand, improving experience for families and reducing legal and financial pressures. Workforce Capacity and Demand Management (Building Block 4) Funding will support:
- Delivery of the SEND Workforce Strategy, including training in Slcn, Semh and neurodiversity
- Embedding reflective supervision, the graduated response and SEND Support as the default
- Increasing workforce confidence to reduce reliance on statutory escalation.
This is critical to achieving the long-term ambition that SEND is everybody’s business, with needs met earlier without defaulting to EHC plans. Capital funding High Needs Capital funding will deliver a step change in SEND provision in Wigan, with inclusion at the heart of sufficiency planning. Planned future investment prioritises mainstream SEND provision including inclusion support bases, specialist bases and mainstream adaptations, enabling more children and young people with SEND to be supported locally, earlier and within mainstream settings. This
approach aligns with the national reforms and our Inclusion and SEND, which sets out a system shift from reactive, high-cost provision to early intervention, inclusive practice and local capacity building. Our approach is underpinned by:
- Inclusion first: mainstream provision as the default
- Local sufficiency: reducing out-of-borough and independent placements
- Graduated support: a continuum of provision.
Inclusion Support Bases Capital funding will support a significant development of Support Bases across primary, secondary and post-16 settings, creating a borough-wide network aligned to need. The first wave will be agreed with schools and trusts by June 2026, with further phases planned to ensure consistent coverage across all neighbourhoods. Provision will prioritise:
- Slcn, Semh and neurodiversity
- Engagement pathways in secondary
- Post-16 inclusion and preparation for adulthood pathways.
These bases will provide flexible, time-limited support within mainstream schools, enabling children to remain in their local community while accessing enhanced provision. This delivers:
- Inclusion at the core of sufficiency
- Access to an inclusion support base for all who need it
- Reduced need to travel for specialist input.
Expansion of Specialist Bases (SEN Units and RPs) Capital funding will also support the expansion of Specialist Bases within mainstream schools, addressing currently low levels of capacity in Wigan schools. These provisions will:
- Support children with more complex needs within mainstream environments
- Provide structured, specialist input while maintaining links to mainstream learning
- Enable step-up and step-down pathways within a graduated system of support.
This reflects Wigan’s commitment to moving away from a binary mainstream versus special school model, towards a balanced continuum where needs are met proportionately. The expansion of Specialist Bases will:
- Increase the proportion of pupils with EHCPs educated in mainstream settings
- Reduce transitions into special school placements
- Improve placement stability and outcomes.
Specialist Capacity and AP Within Wigan’s Sufficiency Plan, investment has been committed to expand and modernise the special school estate for children with the most complex needs. Construction is already underway at Hope School, with a new, larger facility opening in September 2027. Rowan Tree School is also being fully rebuilt, replacing its current poor-condition accommodation, with completion scheduled for September 2028. These developments will increase capacity, provide high-quality learning environments, and reduce reliance on temporary buildings and independent provision. An Alternative Provision Free School has also been approved by the Department for Education, and this will be used as part of a short- term, reintegration-focused pathway, supporting turnaround and preventing escalation rather than creating long-term placements. Alignment with SEND Reform Delivery Capital investment is fully aligned to the SEND Reform Plan workstreams:
- Building Block 1 (Inclusion): supports Oaip and inclusive environments
- Building Block 3 (Sufficiency): enables expansion of Inclusion and Specialist Bases
- Building Block 4 (Workforce): ensures environments support inclusive practice and workforce confidence.
This combined investment in reform delivery and capital infrastructure will address the primary drivers of EHCP growth, reduce escalations into special school and use of the independent sector, increase local mainstream capacity aligned to demand and strengthen mainstream inclusion. This ensures capital funding acts as a direct enabler of system transformation, not just capacity growth.
- System partner and stakeholder engagement, and co-production.
Wigan’s SEND Reform Strategy and Plan has been developed through early, structured and meaningful engagement across the borough, ensuring key stakeholders, including families and providers, have been active contributors to both the design and future delivery of reform. This approach supports Wigan’s readiness for transition into implementation and delivery. Engagement undertaken to support readiness for submission: In preparation for submission to the Department for Education, Wigan has delivered a comprehensive programme of engagement:
- A whole-system Local Partnership Maturity Matrix Assessment workshop (March 2026): Education, health, social care, and the Parent Carer Forum collectively reviewed strengths, gaps and priorities across all seven maturity pillars, shaping Wigan’s shared “change story” and reform priorities.
- Targeted Parent Carer Forum (Pcf) coproduction events (27 April, 6 and 8 May 2026): These sessions were open, transparent and reassurance-focused, enabling families to understand what is changing, what is not, and how Wigan intends to shape local
implementation. Parent and carer feedback has been used directly informed priorities around earlier intervention, mainstream inclusion and communication.
Stakeholder engagement with education settings (1 May 2026): Early years (including Pvi, maintained and childminders), mainstream and special schools, alternative provision, Fe, post-16 and independent providers, as well as health and care partners were invited to sense-check the outcomes of the maturity assessment, contribute to the theory of change and commit to next steps. Future engagement and co-production – next steps for delivery As Wigan moves from planning into delivery, engagement and coproduction with our key stakeholders will be a core mechanism for implementing the strategy, not a parallel activity. Collaboration will focus on translating reform intentions into day-to-day practice and building shared ownership of inclusion outcomes. The partnership will:
Use established forums (Sendiass, Pcf and Embrace), SENCO networks and Partnership Boards across education, health and social care as delivery channels, ensuring all partners understand reform expectations, implementation milestones and their role in system change.
Deliver the planned “Experts at Hand” co-design session (June 2026) as a practical implementation step, enabling early years settings, schools, colleges and alternative and specialist providers and education and health support services to shape specialist deployment, inclusive practice models and workforce development that directly support delivery.
Embed structured feedback loops so that implementation is continuously tested against frontline experience and the lived experience of children and families, with learning used to refine approaches, remove barriers and improve impact. This delivery-led engagement and coproduction model will support partners understanding of the evolving roles under the Schools White Paper, including trust-led system leadership, shared accountability for inclusion and collective responsibility for children and young people with SEND across all schools. This approach will ensure Wigan’s SEND reform plan is co-produced, clearly understood and collaboratively delivered, driving improved outcomes for children and young people within a more inclusive, needs-led system. Attachment 4 – Coproduction with families:
Pcf%20Coproductio n%20Events.docx
10. Risks and Mitigations
| Risk Description | Impact | Likelihood | RAG | Mitigation | Residual RAG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Financial risks Escalating demand in light of the proposed national reforms, changes to legislation and local proposals may escalate demand and costs over the next three years undermining our strategic priorities. Increased EHC assessments requests and parental preference for specialist provision may occur before reforms are fully embedded, limiting capacity and capability to invest in early intervention. This may worsen the High Needs DSG deficit position and the delivery of planned deficit recovery and cost reduction actions. Potential impact: • Higher parental requests for EHC needs assessments • Increases in appeals to the tribunal for special school placements • Continued reliance on the independent sector • Growth in High Needs DSG deficits • Reduced ability to invest in preventative and inclusive support • Financial instability impacting local strategy delivery • Failure to deliver planned DSG deficit recovery targets • Increased risk of DfE intervention or statutory override • Reduced credibility of financial recovery plan. | Crisis | Possible | • Implement a SEND financial transition and sustainability plan aligned to Wigan’s Strategy and Plan, setting out short-, medium- and long-term demand and cost controls. • Use regular demand, cost and scenario modelling to anticipate increases in EHC needs assessments, tribunal activity and specialist placement pressure during transition. • Strengthen clear, consistent communication with families about the SEND reforms, Wigan’s Strategy and Transformation Plan and support routes to reduce anxiety-driven escalation. • Prioritise investment in early intervention and mainstream capacity (OAIP, inclusion support, specialist bases in mainstream school) linked explicitly to demand reduction. • Review and reshape commissioning and placement strategies, including tighter oversight of independent sector use and clearer placement decision-making criteria. • Ensure SEND financial risk and impact are routinely reviewed through Partnership Board and DSG governance to inform corrective action early. • Ensure clear alignment between SEND reform activity and DSG deficit recovery plan, with measurable savings and avoidance targets tracked through governance. | ||
| 2. Legal compliance risks Over the next three years practice will still be governed by our duties set out in the Children and Families Act 2014, including thresholds for EHC needs assessments and when an EHC Plan is required, decision making in relation to resource allocation and parental rights to appeal. Insufficient trust, engagement or clarity with families increases the risk of higher complaints, SENDIST appeals and tribunal activity during a period of significant change. Potential impact: • Increase complaints and escalation to the Local Government Ombudsman • Increased legal challenge and tribunal costs • Delays to the delivery of key metrics in Wigan’s reform strategy and plan • Reduced confidence in the fairness and transparency of decision-making. | Crisis | Possible | • Maintain strict adherence to Children and Families Act 2014 duties, ensuring thresholds, decision-making and statutory timescales remain compliant throughout reform. • Strengthen decision-making quality assurance for EHC assessments, provision and placements to reduce challenge and inconsistencies. • Embed coproduction with families in policy development, pathway design and change implementation to build trust and transparency. • Deliver a clear, accessible communication approach explaining rights, protections, what is changing and what is not. • Monitor complaints, mediation, LGO and tribunal trends to identify early warning signs and address systemic issues before escalation. • Support frontline staff in managing complex conversations confidently and consistently. | ||
| 3. Organisational and governance risks Changes in political priorities, leadership and operational workforce turnover or competing system pressures may weaken strategic sponsorship and slow the pace of change. Insufficient capacity, skills and expertise or dedicated transformation time across partners may limit the ability to deliver reform at scale. Inconsistent or insufficient data quality, integration and insight across education, health and care may limit the ability to accurately understand demand, track impact and inform decision making during SEND reform implementation. Potential impact: | Critical | Likely | • Maintain visible and sustained sponsorship from political, senior officer and health leaders with clear ownership of reform outcomes. • Embed SEND reform priorities into corporate plans, partnership strategies and performance frameworks to protect focus through leadership or political change. • Align SEND reform with wider priorities (e.g. inclusion, early help, health inequalities) to avoid competing transformation agendas. • Provide regular, evidence-based reporting to elected members and senior leaders linking progress to outcomes, financial sustainability and inspection readiness. • Use cross-party briefings and shared narratives to support continuity across political parties. • Establish a clear programme delivery structure with defined leadership, workstreams and accountability. |
| Risk Description | Impact | Likelihood | RAG | Mitigation | Residual RAG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| • Loss of strategic and operational focus on change priorities • Budget constraints do not sustain transformation priorities • Competing and dissonant transformation strategic priorities across partners leads to fragmented focus and reduced impact • Reduced confidence across key stakeholders in partners and families if changes do not lead to meaningful change. • Delays to implementation milestones without purposeful workforce planning and recruitment into specialist roles • Over-reliance on a small number of key individuals to affect change • Reduced quality and sustainability of change • Weak forecasting of demand and financial pressures • Inability to evidence impact of reforms to DfE and inspectors • Poor targeting of resources and interventions • Reduced confidence in decision making across the system • Delayed identification of emerging risks. | • Undertake a capacity and skills assessment across partners to identify gaps in programme management, data, SEND practice and coproduction. • Protect dedicated transformation capacity and time, minimising diversion into business-as-usual pressures. • Use phased delivery and prioritisation, focusing first on high-impact changes. • Maximise capacity through joint roles, secondments and shared system resources, particularly across education, health and care, in particular across specialist roles. • Implement a SEND data improvement plan aligned to reform priorities • Strengthen data integration across education, health and care systems • Develop shared dashboards for demand, cost, timeliness and outcomes • Embed routine performance reporting through governance boards • Improve data quality assurance processes and accountability across partners. | ||||
| 4. Reputational risks Limited engagement or resistance from mainstream schools and settings may undermine delivery of SEND reforms. In the context of wider system pressures, schools may perceive reforms as increasing workload, risk or accountability. Potential impact: • Inconsistent implementation of inclusive and ordinarily available provision • Continued over-reliance on EHCPs and specialist placements • Weak alignment between education partners and the wider SEND strategy • Reduced effectiveness of early intervention and the graduated response • Diminished credibility with parents, schools, inspectors and other key stakeholders • Loss of trust across families and partners during transition • Increased challenge and resistance to reform changes. | Crisis | Possible | • Actively co-design reform delivery with mainstream schools, SENCOs, trusts and early years settings to ensure changes are realistic and workload-aware. • Clearly articulate a shared local inclusion strategy, setting expectations alongside tangible support and escalation pathways. • Provide visible, practical support to schools (training, outreach, SEMH and behaviour support, specialist advice). • Use peer networks and shared accountability mechanisms to build confidence and consistency across settings. • Strengthen data quality and shared insight to demonstrate impact, fairness and reduced pressure over time. • Communicate progress transparently to schools, families and inspectors, evidencing benefits and system improvement. | ||
| 5. Capital delivery risks Risk Description: Delays in capital delivery programmes (including support and specialist bases) may limit the system’s ability to create sufficient inclusive capacity in line with demand and reform timelines. Potential impact: • Insufficient local specialist placements • Continued reliance on costly independent provision • Increased transport and out-of-area placements • Failure to realise inclusion ambitions within mainstream settings • Negative impact on DSG deficit recovery assumptions • Reduced confidence from families and partners. | Crisis | Possible | • Maintain robust capital programme governance with clear milestones and escalation routes. • Align capital delivery timelines explicitly with demand forecasting and SEND sufficiency planning. • Develop contingency plans (e.g. temporary expansions, commissioning flex) where delays arise. • Strengthen partnership with education providers to support phased or interim capacity solutions. • Regularly report capital risks and impact through SEND governance and capital boards. |
- Dependencies
Wigan’s Inclusion and SEND Reform Plan sets out a future state focused on earlier identification, inclusive mainstream provision, and reduced reliance on statutory processes. Delivery of this vision is dependent on several national and local reforms, which may affect both the pace and sequencing of implementation, the delivery of key milestones, and the achievement of success measures. NHS reforms (Integrated Care Systems): Effective SEND delivery requires timely access to health services and robust joint commissioning. Current pressures in Speech and Language Therapy and neurodevelopmental pathways already create delays, increasing reliance on EHCPs and limiting progress towards early intervention milestones. Further NHS reform may impact workforce capacity, commissioning arrangements and decision-making timelines. This will be mitigated through a formal joint commissioning framework with agreed decision timelines, multi-agency panels with clear escalation routes, and shared workforce plans aligned to sufficiency targets. A needs-led model enabling access to support without diagnosis will be implemented, supported by shared performance dashboards to monitor timeliness and recovery. Local Government Reorganisation: This may affect governance structures, accountability and funding flows, potentially disrupting delivery of inclusion frameworks and sufficiency planning and delaying key decisions within the roadmap. To mitigate this, Wigan will formalise SEND partnership governance with clearly defined delegated authority, maintain decision-making continuity through agreed protocols, and protect delivery through place-based models such as Family Hubs and school clusters. A shared outcomes framework and co-production charter will ensure consistency, alongside a defined transition plan for SEND functions. Reforms to Children’s Social Care (Families First): These align with SEND priorities around early intervention and family support. However, without alignment, there is a risk of duplication or gaps, particularly in attendance, emotional wellbeing and Ebsa, undermining delivery of a consistent graduated response. Mitigation will include developing a shared threshold framework and joint decision-making protocol, integrating SEND within Family Help pathways, ensuring SEND representation in panels, and using shared data to track outcomes and inform commissioning decisions. Best Start in Life and Family Hubs: Delivery of early identification is highly dependent on this programme. Changes in funding, workforce or delivery models may reduce capacity to deliver Asq and Early Health Notifications, delaying identification and increasing later demand on specialist services. This will be mitigated by embedding SEND requirements within Family Hub specifications and KPIs, co-locating SEND, health visiting and early years practitioners, and implementing a standardised early years Oaip offer. Delivery will be monitored through agreed early identification metrics. The Curriculum and Assessment Review: This is a key dependency, particularly at secondary phase. Changes to curriculum breadth or accountability may increase exclusions and demand for specialist provision, impacting sufficiency planning and inclusion targets. Mitigation includes implementing Oaip through targeted workforce training, introducing structured inclusive curriculum support for
schools, expanding vocational and alternative pathways, and using data on attendance, exclusions and attainment to adjust delivery. Additional dependencies include Ofsted/CQC inspections, funding reforms, workforce capacity (including Educational Psychology), attendance policy, post-16 transitions and data integration. These may impact delivery of workforce expansion, early intervention capacity and transition outcomes. Mitigation will include aligning delivery milestones with inspection and funding cycles, implementing a detailed multi-agency workforce plan with clear capacity targets, embedding a consistent Ebsa graduated response, strengthening Year 9–post-16 transition pathways through joint commissioning, and delivering a shared multi-agency data framework with agreed reporting responsibilities. Together, these mitigations ensure the reform programme remains resilient, partnership-led and deliverable, focused on improving outcomes for children and young people with SEND.
Section 3 – Monitoring and Evaluation
- How will the local area partnership know delivery is on track?
Wigan will build on its current scorecard to provide a clear line of sight from SEND Reform priorities to activity, performance and outcomes. The scorecard will be reviewed and refreshed to ensure it reflects reform critical milestones, statutory duties and locally agreed outcomes. It will include clearly defined baselines, milestones and trajectories to track delivery in year one and beyond, with a focus on ensuring progress remains on track. The scorecard will include a balanced set of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) spanning:
- Demand: EHC referrals for assessments, timeliness of statutory processes, and needs trends by cohort.
- Service delivery: deployment and capacity of Speech and Language Therapy and wider specialist teams, delivery of early intervention offers, and progress in creating additional specialist and AP places.
- Service quality: parental and young people satisfaction, complaints and feedback themes, and service response times.
- Outputs and outcomes: attendance, suspensions and exclusions, reintegration from AP, and indicators linked to preparation for adulthood.
Performance measures will be analysed over time against established baselines to assess both progress and the impact of reforms on outcomes for children and young people, ensuring a clear link between activity, outputs and longer-term outcomes. Data from education, health and council systems will continue to be drawn together into a central operational dashboard. Partners will continue to strengthen data-sharing arrangements to ensure a comprehensive, partnership-wide dataset, particularly in relation to health performance metrics. The dashboard will support timely, near real-time insight and will be routinely used by operational and service leads (at least weekly) to monitor pressures, identify emerging trends, and inform responsive conversations with schools, settings and delivery providers. A consolidated view of scorecard performance and dashboard intelligence will be reviewed monthly by Wigan’s SEND and AP Strategy and Performance Group, with quarterly reports provided to the Partnership Board. This will support timely decision-making on prioritisation, resource deployment and system-wide problem solving. Areas of underperformance will trigger focused deep dives and agreed recovery actions, which will be tracked through the Board to ensure delivery remains on course. Measures within the scorecard will align with the partnership’s agreed success measures and SEND reform priorities, ensuring coherence between strategic intent, delivery and evaluation. Feedback and adaptation mechanisms
Coproduction and lived experience: Feedback from parents, carers, children and young people will be gathered through surveys, engagement forums and service-level feedback and reported alongside quantitative performance data to test progress against lived experience. Operational and service leads will work in close partnership with Sendiass, Embrace and the Vcsfe to ensure feedback is gathered impartially and reflects borough-wide lived experience, including the voices of seldom heard and hard-to-reach groups. Insight from these partners will be used to sense-check performance data, identify gaps or inequities in provision, and inform targeted improvements across the borough. Practitioner and system feedback: Regular dialogue with SENCOs, school and college leaders, early years settings and health practitioners will provide a structured feedback loop to understand implementation challenges, capacity pressures and system barriers, enabling timely adjustments to delivery. Continuous improvement: The SEND and AP Partnership Board will use triangulated quantitative data and qualitative stakeholder insight to review progress, refine measures within the scorecard, and adapt delivery where required. Together, these monitoring and feedback mechanisms create a continuous cycle of insight, action and review, supporting effective implementation, agile decision-making and sustained improvement in outcomes for children and young people.
- Reporting to DfE:
Attachment 5: DfE Reporting template
The%20Local%20SE Nd%20Reform%20Pl
Section 4 – Governance 14. How will the local area partnership ensure delivery of plans remain on track?
| Governance Mechanism | Purpose/ Responsibilities | Membership | Cadence | Decision Rights | Escalation Route |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health and Wellbeing Board | • Provides ultimate strategic oversight of SEND reform plan as part of wider. partnership transformation. • Ensures alignment with: Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) Health inequalities priorities Children & Young People’s Strategy Progress with Unity missions. • Holds system leaders, including SRO, to account for outcomes, impact and | • Lead Member for Children’s Services (Co-chair) • Director of Children’s Services (DCS) • ICB Executive representation • Public Health • Adult Social Care • Education leadership (schools/academy reps) Parent/Carer Forum representation • Voluntary sector. | Quarterly (with SEND deep dive twice per year). | • Sets strategic direction and priorities. • Endorses major system changes and investment priorities. • Holds partners to account for system performance and outcomes | • Receives escalations from SEND & AP Partnership Board. • Escalates to Council Cabinet and ICB Board as required (risks/issues). |
| Governance Mechanism | Purpose/ Responsibilities | Membership | Cadence | Decision Rights | Escalation Route |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| financial sustainability. • Provides democratic oversight and escalates to Cabinet where required. | |||||
| SEND and AP Partnership Board | • Accountable for delivery of SEND Reform Plan. • Owner the SEND Strategy and improvement programme. • Provides wholesystem leadership, delivery grip and financial oversight. • Provides scrutiny and challenge on outcomes, performance, delivery and high needs financial sustainability. • Resolves crossagency barriers. | Co-chaired between DCS and ICB senior lead to ensure shared accountability. • DCS (Co-chair) • ICB senior lead (Co-chair) • AD/Service Lead level representation: Education SEND Social Care Health (therapy, CAMHS) • School and AP leaders • Parent/Carer Forum • Voluntary sector • Finance leads. | Bi-monthly | • Approves reform priorities and changes • Agrees systemwide policies and delivery models • Allocates resources within agreed envelopes • Holds partners and workstream SROs to account. | • Escalates strategic/system risks to HWB • Receives escalations from: Performance & Strategy Group Joint Commissioning Group. |
| Governance Mechanism | Purpose/ Responsibilities | Membership | Cadence | Decision Rights | Escalation Route |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRO and Accountability: Director of Education and Inclusion is the named SRO, accountable for delivery, outcomes and reporting to HWB. | |||||
| SEND Performance & Strategy Group | • Provides operational oversight and programme assurance. • Tracks: KPIs (EHCP timeliness, inclusion, outcomes) Workstream delivery milestones Inspection readiness (Ofsted/CQC) • Oversees risk management, RAG ratings and exception reporting. • Commissions deep dives and | • Service Leads/Managers (SEND, Inclusion, Education) • Health operational leads • Data & intelligence leads • Finance business partners • Programme/PMO lead (responsible for assurance reporting) • School/AP representatives • Parent/Carer Forum. | Monthly | • Agree performance improvement actions • Reprioritise delivery within agreed strategy • Commission targeted reviews and deep dives. | • Escalates delivery risks to Partnership Board • Escalates commissioning issues to Joint Commissioning Group • Receives escalations from workstreams and Experts at Hand group. |
| Governance Mechanism | Purpose/ Responsibilities | Membership | Cadence | Decision Rights | Escalation Route |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| drives performance improvement • Ensure data-led decision-making and consistent reporting. | |||||
| Workstream Groups x 4 – one for each building block (Strengthening Inclusion, Local Partnership collaboration & co-production, Specialist support & local placements, Inclusive culture & behaviours) | • Deliver reform priorities and translate strategy into detailed plans, milestones, and outputs • Identify risks and barriers early • Engage frontline practitioners and stakeholders. Accountability: Each workstream will be led by a Senior Workstream Officer accountable for delivery of outcomes within scope. | • Workstream SRO (Senior Responsible Officer) • Operational managers and practitioners • Health partners (where relevant) • Schools/AP representatives • Parent/carer representation • PMO support. | Monthly or fortnightly (depending on pace/stage) | • Deliver agreed actions within scope • Recommend changes, investment, or policy shifts. | • Performance/delivery - Performance & Strategy Group • Resource/service issues - Joint Commissioning Group. |
| Experts at Hand working group | • Oversees delivery of the Experts at Hand model • Ensures timely access to expertise and | • Educational Psychology, Specialist Teachers • Health therapies (SALT, OT, CAMHS) | Monthly | • Shapes operational model, thresholds, and pathways | • Capacity/resource issues - Joint Commissioning Group • Delivery/performance - Performance & Strategy Group |
| Governance Mechanism | Purpose/ Responsibilities | Membership | Cadence | Decision Rights | Escalation Route |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| reduced escalation to statutory services • Tracks demand, response times, and impact. | • Early Help and SEND leads • School and inclusion representatives. | • Identifies workforce and capacity requirements. | |||
| Joint Commissioning working group | • Leads integrated commissioning across LA and ICB • Ensures: Effective use of High Needs and health funding Market sufficiency and development Value for money and impact • Aligns commissioning with SEND reform priorities. | • LA and ICB commissioning leads • Finance representatives • Procurement • Service leads (education, therapies, early help) • Designated Clinical Officer (DCO). | Monthly | • Agrees service specifications and commissioning plans • Recommends investment/ disinvestment decisions • Approves plans within delegated limits. | • Strategic commissioning decisions - Partnership Board • System-level risks - HWB (via Partnership Board) • Receives escalations from workstreams. |
| NHS Greater Manchester – ICB SEND Governance | • The ICB governance structure provides system-wide oversight, assurance and strategic direction | • Membership spans senior leaders from NHS GM (including ICB executives and commissioning leads), local authorities, | Formal governance operates through a tiered meeting structure, with regular (e.g. | • Strategic commissioning, resource allocation and system priorities are agreed at GM ICB and | • Issues relating to delivery, performance or risk are escalated through locality SEND Partnership Boards to GM SEND Strategic Partnership structures |
| Governance Mechanism | Purpose/ Responsibilities | Membership | Cadence | Decision Rights | Escalation Route |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| for SEND across Greater Manchester. • It is responsible for commissioning health services, aligning NHS priorities with SEND reform, and ensuring delivery of statutory duties. • It supports consistency across places while enabling local flexibility, and provides assurance on performance, outcomes, and delivery of integrated pathways, including early identification and intervention. | education partners, and children’s services, alongside representation from Parent Carer Forums and wider stakeholders through SEND communities of practice. This ensures coproduction and multi-agency accountability across all levels of governance. | monthly or quarterly) meetings at GM and locality level. Strategic boards meet quarterly to review performance, delivery and risk, while locality SEND Partnership Boards and operational groups meet more frequently to drive implementation and respond to emerging issues. | committee level, with delegated authority to locality partnerships for place-based planning and delivery. • Local Area SEND Partnership Boards hold responsibility for operational decision-making, implementation of reform priorities, and oversight of local performance within the agreed GM framework. | and, where required, to the Strategic Commissioning Committee and NHS GM Integrated Care Board. • This ensures clear lines of accountability and timely resolution of system-level challenges impacting SEND delivery. |
Cross-cutting Assurance, Transparency and Reporting in Wigan:
A formal programme assurance framework is in place including: Risk and issue logs RAG-rated delivery reporting Exception reporting and escalation protocols.
A Programme Management Office (Pmo) coordinating performance reporting across all governance tiers.
Standardised dashboards and reporting packs providing consistent data on outcomes, finance, and delivery.
Decisions, actions, and risks are formally recorded and shared across the partnership.
Regular reporting is provided to: Health and Wellbeing Board Council Cabinet and scrutiny functions.
Engagement with parents/carers, schools, and partners ensures transparency and co-production.
Attachment 6a – Wigan SEND and AP Partnership Arrangements: Wigan%20SEND%20 Partnership%20Gover Attachment 6b – NHS Greater Manchester: Icb SEND Governance: NHS%20GM%20SEN D%20Governance%20 Section 5 – Central Government Support
- How can we help you?
To implement Wigan’s SEND Reform Plan effectively and at pace, partners would welcome targeted and practical support from central government that complements our strong local foundations. Access to specialist expertise and advisory support: We would benefit from time-limited access to national SEND Reform expertise, particularly in areas such as alternative models of specialist delivery within mainstream settings and evidence informed practice which enable mainstream inclusion. External challenge and facilitation would support the partnership to test assumptions in our theory of change, strengthen learning where complex whole-scale change is required. Workforce development and recruitment support: National support to address workforce shortages across Educational Psychology, Speech and Language Therapy and Occupational Therapy would be valuable. Access to national recruitment pipelines, training capacity, and system-wide workforce planning tools aligned to SEND and AP reforms would enable the partnership to address workforce challenges in a constrained labour market. Peer learning and regional collaboration: Facilitated peer learning opportunities with statistically similar areas, both within Greater Manchester and nationally, would enable the partnership to identify ‘what works’ elsewhere, test emerging models and avoid reinventing solutions. The ability to participate in structured, reform-focused peer learning would support our improvement trajectory. Policy clarity: Clear national guidance to support coordination across education, health and care – particularly where accountability, commissioning and funding responsibilities span multiple agencies. This includes clarity on navigating regulatory and policy constraints that can unintentionally reinforce escalation or diagnosis-led pathways to be initiated.
-end document-